对智障老年人的关怀和支持,超越对“就地”老龄化的追求:朝着构建一个(长)空间的方向发展

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Tineke Schiettecat, Jorrit Campens, Griet Roets, Nico De Witte, Joan Lesseliers, Ilse Goethals
{"title":"对智障老年人的关怀和支持,超越对“就地”老龄化的追求:朝着构建一个(长)空间的方向发展","authors":"Tineke Schiettecat, Jorrit Campens, Griet Roets, Nico De Witte, Joan Lesseliers, Ilse Goethals","doi":"10.1080/13691457.2023.2257004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhereas population ageing has been a much debated issue over the last decades, the political and scientific awareness of the longevity of adults with intellectual disabilities is considered relatively new. When the situations of older people with intellectual disabilities are coming into focus, attention has especially been drawn to medical aspects or to expected challenges of their ageing for health and social service providers. In that vein, a prominent yet rather wicked issue has been the question whether either disability care or elderly care services are the right place to meet their needs. This article discusses findings of a qualitative research study that aimed to reconstruct and investigate 10 care trajectories of ageing people with intellectual disabilities. Based on open interviews with the individuals themselves and with significant others from their formal and informal networks, we identified mechanisms in society that allow or deny older people with intellectual disabilities access to certain care settings or welfare provision. Moreover, we discovered concerns, interests and aspirations that are often left unseen. This shows the necessity to go beyond the debate of ‘ageing in (or out of) place’, and challenges us to create opportunities and strategies to create ‘a space to be(long)’.ABSTRACTTerwijl de vergrijzing van de algemene bevolking de afgelopen decennia een gekend onderwerp is van maatschappelijk debat, is het politieke en wetenschappelijke bewustzijn van de stijgende levensverwachting van volwassenen met verstandelijke beperkingen relatief nieuw. Wanneer de situatie van oudere personen met verstandelijke beperkingen onder de aandacht komt, wordt de focus vooral gelegd op medische aspecten of op verwachte uitdagingen van hun veroudering voor de gezondheidszorg en sociale dienstverlening. Een prominente, maar complexe kwestie in deze context is de vraag of eerder de ouderenzorg ofwel de gehandicaptenzorg het best geschikt is om aan hun behoeften te voldoen. Dit artikel bespreekt de bevindingen van een kwalitatief onderzoek waarin de zorgtrajecten van 10 ouder wordende personen met verstandelijke beperkingen gereconstrueerd en onderzocht werden. Op basis van open interviews met de betrokkenen zelf en met relevante actoren uit hun formele en informele netwerk, identificeerden we mechanismen in de samenleving die ouderen met verstandelijke beperkingen toegang geven of ontzeggen tot bepaalde zorginstellingen of welzijnsvoorzieningen. Bovendien ontdekten we bekommernissen, interesses en aspiraties die veelal onbelicht blijven. Dit toont de noodzaak om voorbij te gaan aan het debat over toegang krijgen tot een bestaande plaats, en daagt ons uit om op zoek te gaan naar mogelijkheden en strategieën om een plaats te creëren om te bestaan, ook op oudere leeftijd.KEYWORDS: Quality of lifebelongingintellectual disabilitieselderlyageing in placeTREFWOORDEN: kwaliteit van levenerbij horenverstandelijke beperkingouderenter plaatse ouder worden Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recent policy plans are focusing on the introduction of an adjusted scaling instrument (BelRAI) that should allow a more ‘global assessment of a person’s physical, cognitive, psychological and social care and support needs’ (Beke, Citation2019, p. 21 – Policy note on Welfare, Public health, family and poverty reduction 2019–2024).Additional informationNotes on contributorsTineke SchiettecatTineke Schiettecat works as a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy (Ghent University). She is also lecturer at the department of Social Educational Care Work, and affiliated as a researcher to the EQUALITY Research Collective and eCO-CITY (HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts). Her research interests involve qualitative research about social work and welfare rights in relation to issues of poverty, disability and age.Jorrit CampensJorrit Campens obtained a master's degree in nursing and midwifery and, in 2015, started working at the HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts as a lecturer in the bachelor's program in nursing and as a researcher focusing on older adults with intellectual disabilities and students' attitudes toward older people. Since 2020, Jorrit has also been working at Vrije Universiteit Brussel as a doctoral student contributing to the Digital Ageing project. His work is centered around the development of typologies of internet (non-)users among older adults.Griet RoetsProf. dr. Griet Roets is Professor at the Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy at Ghent University. Her work focuses on social work, citizenship and social rights, intersections of poverty, disability, gender, and age, and the way in which social services and social workers carry or critically reflect on and question broader societal developments. Her research and teaching interest includes qualitative and interpretative research, and dimensions of research ethics.Nico De WitteProf. dr. Nico De Witte is one of the founders of the elderly needs studies and has been exploring the intersections and needs of elderly people living in Belgium and several other European Countries since 2002. He is currently a member of the faculty Psychology and Adult Educational Sciences at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and of the Faculty of Health Care, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts. His research interests are frailty, quality of life, quality of care, loneliness in later life, the added value of digital applications for the elderly in their daily lives and in healthcare provision, etc.Joan LesseliersJoan Lesseliers is a lecturer at the Department of Social-Educational Care Work and researcher at the Research Centre - Substance Use and Psychosocial Risk Behaviours (SUPRB), both at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts.Ilse GoethalsIlse Goethals is lecturer at the department of Social Educational Care Work, and researcher at the EQUALITY Research Collective, both situated within Ghent University of Applied Sciences and Arts. She is also an affiliated researcher at Ghent University, department of Special Needs Education. She has experience in applied scientific research which mainly focusses on optimizing the quality of life of socially vulnerable populations by analysing treatment processes (on an organisational-, system-, care providers- and/or client-level) and assessing implementation of treatment interventions.","PeriodicalId":12060,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Work","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care and support for older people with intellectual disabilities beyond the pursuit of ageing ‘in place’: towards constructing a space to be(long)\",\"authors\":\"Tineke Schiettecat, Jorrit Campens, Griet Roets, Nico De Witte, Joan Lesseliers, Ilse Goethals\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691457.2023.2257004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTWhereas population ageing has been a much debated issue over the last decades, the political and scientific awareness of the longevity of adults with intellectual disabilities is considered relatively new. When the situations of older people with intellectual disabilities are coming into focus, attention has especially been drawn to medical aspects or to expected challenges of their ageing for health and social service providers. In that vein, a prominent yet rather wicked issue has been the question whether either disability care or elderly care services are the right place to meet their needs. This article discusses findings of a qualitative research study that aimed to reconstruct and investigate 10 care trajectories of ageing people with intellectual disabilities. Based on open interviews with the individuals themselves and with significant others from their formal and informal networks, we identified mechanisms in society that allow or deny older people with intellectual disabilities access to certain care settings or welfare provision. Moreover, we discovered concerns, interests and aspirations that are often left unseen. This shows the necessity to go beyond the debate of ‘ageing in (or out of) place’, and challenges us to create opportunities and strategies to create ‘a space to be(long)’.ABSTRACTTerwijl de vergrijzing van de algemene bevolking de afgelopen decennia een gekend onderwerp is van maatschappelijk debat, is het politieke en wetenschappelijke bewustzijn van de stijgende levensverwachting van volwassenen met verstandelijke beperkingen relatief nieuw. Wanneer de situatie van oudere personen met verstandelijke beperkingen onder de aandacht komt, wordt de focus vooral gelegd op medische aspecten of op verwachte uitdagingen van hun veroudering voor de gezondheidszorg en sociale dienstverlening. Een prominente, maar complexe kwestie in deze context is de vraag of eerder de ouderenzorg ofwel de gehandicaptenzorg het best geschikt is om aan hun behoeften te voldoen. Dit artikel bespreekt de bevindingen van een kwalitatief onderzoek waarin de zorgtrajecten van 10 ouder wordende personen met verstandelijke beperkingen gereconstrueerd en onderzocht werden. Op basis van open interviews met de betrokkenen zelf en met relevante actoren uit hun formele en informele netwerk, identificeerden we mechanismen in de samenleving die ouderen met verstandelijke beperkingen toegang geven of ontzeggen tot bepaalde zorginstellingen of welzijnsvoorzieningen. Bovendien ontdekten we bekommernissen, interesses en aspiraties die veelal onbelicht blijven. Dit toont de noodzaak om voorbij te gaan aan het debat over toegang krijgen tot een bestaande plaats, en daagt ons uit om op zoek te gaan naar mogelijkheden en strategieën om een plaats te creëren om te bestaan, ook op oudere leeftijd.KEYWORDS: Quality of lifebelongingintellectual disabilitieselderlyageing in placeTREFWOORDEN: kwaliteit van levenerbij horenverstandelijke beperkingouderenter plaatse ouder worden Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recent policy plans are focusing on the introduction of an adjusted scaling instrument (BelRAI) that should allow a more ‘global assessment of a person’s physical, cognitive, psychological and social care and support needs’ (Beke, Citation2019, p. 21 – Policy note on Welfare, Public health, family and poverty reduction 2019–2024).Additional informationNotes on contributorsTineke SchiettecatTineke Schiettecat works as a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy (Ghent University). She is also lecturer at the department of Social Educational Care Work, and affiliated as a researcher to the EQUALITY Research Collective and eCO-CITY (HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts). Her research interests involve qualitative research about social work and welfare rights in relation to issues of poverty, disability and age.Jorrit CampensJorrit Campens obtained a master's degree in nursing and midwifery and, in 2015, started working at the HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts as a lecturer in the bachelor's program in nursing and as a researcher focusing on older adults with intellectual disabilities and students' attitudes toward older people. Since 2020, Jorrit has also been working at Vrije Universiteit Brussel as a doctoral student contributing to the Digital Ageing project. His work is centered around the development of typologies of internet (non-)users among older adults.Griet RoetsProf. dr. Griet Roets is Professor at the Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy at Ghent University. Her work focuses on social work, citizenship and social rights, intersections of poverty, disability, gender, and age, and the way in which social services and social workers carry or critically reflect on and question broader societal developments. Her research and teaching interest includes qualitative and interpretative research, and dimensions of research ethics.Nico De WitteProf. dr. Nico De Witte is one of the founders of the elderly needs studies and has been exploring the intersections and needs of elderly people living in Belgium and several other European Countries since 2002. He is currently a member of the faculty Psychology and Adult Educational Sciences at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and of the Faculty of Health Care, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts. His research interests are frailty, quality of life, quality of care, loneliness in later life, the added value of digital applications for the elderly in their daily lives and in healthcare provision, etc.Joan LesseliersJoan Lesseliers is a lecturer at the Department of Social-Educational Care Work and researcher at the Research Centre - Substance Use and Psychosocial Risk Behaviours (SUPRB), both at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts.Ilse GoethalsIlse Goethals is lecturer at the department of Social Educational Care Work, and researcher at the EQUALITY Research Collective, both situated within Ghent University of Applied Sciences and Arts. She is also an affiliated researcher at Ghent University, department of Special Needs Education. She has experience in applied scientific research which mainly focusses on optimizing the quality of life of socially vulnerable populations by analysing treatment processes (on an organisational-, system-, care providers- and/or client-level) and assessing implementation of treatment interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2257004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2257004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在过去的几十年里,人口老龄化一直是一个备受争议的问题,而政治和科学对智力残疾成年人长寿的认识相对较新。当有智力残疾的老年人的情况成为焦点时,人们特别注意医疗方面的问题,或他们的老龄化对保健和社会服务提供者的预期挑战。在这种情况下,一个突出但相当邪恶的问题是,残疾人护理服务或老年人护理服务是否适合满足他们的需求。本文讨论了一项质性研究的结果,旨在重建和调查老年智障人士的10个护理轨迹。基于对这些老年人本人以及他们正式和非正式网络中的重要人物的公开访谈,我们确定了允许或拒绝智障老年人获得某些护理设施或福利的社会机制。此外,我们还发现了经常被忽视的关切、兴趣和愿望。这表明有必要超越“老龄化在(或不在)地方”的争论,并挑战我们创造机会和策略来创造“一个(长)空间”。摘要/ abstract摘要:从历史的角度看,在历史的角度看,在历史的角度看,历史的角度看,在历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度看,历史的角度。无论在何种情况下,人们都会遇到各种各样的问题,例如,人们会遇到各种各样的问题,例如,人们会遇到各种各样的问题,例如,人们会遇到各种各样的问题,例如,人们会遇到各种各样的问题,例如,人们会遇到各种各样的问题。更重要的是,在复杂的语境中,许多复杂的问题都是对复杂语境的曲解,而最好的曲解是对复杂语境的曲解。这篇文章描述了在10个更大的世界里,人们遇到了更大的人,就像在10个更大的世界里,人们遇到了更大的人,就像在10个更大的世界里遇到了更大的人。在公开访谈的基础上,研究了参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用、参与者之间的相互作用等。当我们成为商人时,兴趣和抱负就会显露在信仰上。这是一场争论,争论的焦点是:是否要让我们的星球变得更美丽,是否要让我们的星球变得更美丽,是否要让我们的星球变得更美丽,是否要让我们的星球变得更美丽,是否要让我们的星球变得更美丽。关键词:生活质量;智力残疾;老年;老年安置;关键词:生活质量;智力残疾;关键词:生活质量;智力残疾;关键词:健康;注1最近的政策计划侧重于引入一种调整后的衡量工具(BelRAI),该工具应允许对一个人的身体、认知、心理和社会护理和支持需求进行更全面的评估(Beke, Citation2019,第21页- 2019-2024年福利、公共卫生、家庭和减贫政策说明)。作者简介:steineke Schiettecat是根特大学社会工作与社会教育学系的博士后研究员。她也是社会教育关怀工作系的讲师,并作为研究员隶属于平等研究集体和生态城(霍根应用科学与艺术大学)。她的研究兴趣涉及与贫困、残疾和年龄问题有关的社会工作和福利权利的定性研究。Jorrit Campens获得护理和助产学硕士学位,并于2015年开始在霍根特应用科学与艺术大学(HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts)担任护理学士课程的讲师,同时也是一名专注于研究智障老年人和学生对老年人态度的研究员。自2020年以来,Jorrit还在布鲁塞尔自由大学(Vrije Universiteit brussels)担任博士生,为数字老龄化项目做出贡献。他的工作集中在老年人中互联网(非)用户的类型学发展。Griet RoetsProf。格里耶特·罗茨博士是根特大学社会工作与社会教育学系教授。她的工作重点是社会工作、公民身份和社会权利、贫困、残疾、性别和年龄的交叉点,以及社会服务和社会工作者对更广泛的社会发展进行或批判性反思和质疑的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Care and support for older people with intellectual disabilities beyond the pursuit of ageing ‘in place’: towards constructing a space to be(long)
ABSTRACTWhereas population ageing has been a much debated issue over the last decades, the political and scientific awareness of the longevity of adults with intellectual disabilities is considered relatively new. When the situations of older people with intellectual disabilities are coming into focus, attention has especially been drawn to medical aspects or to expected challenges of their ageing for health and social service providers. In that vein, a prominent yet rather wicked issue has been the question whether either disability care or elderly care services are the right place to meet their needs. This article discusses findings of a qualitative research study that aimed to reconstruct and investigate 10 care trajectories of ageing people with intellectual disabilities. Based on open interviews with the individuals themselves and with significant others from their formal and informal networks, we identified mechanisms in society that allow or deny older people with intellectual disabilities access to certain care settings or welfare provision. Moreover, we discovered concerns, interests and aspirations that are often left unseen. This shows the necessity to go beyond the debate of ‘ageing in (or out of) place’, and challenges us to create opportunities and strategies to create ‘a space to be(long)’.ABSTRACTTerwijl de vergrijzing van de algemene bevolking de afgelopen decennia een gekend onderwerp is van maatschappelijk debat, is het politieke en wetenschappelijke bewustzijn van de stijgende levensverwachting van volwassenen met verstandelijke beperkingen relatief nieuw. Wanneer de situatie van oudere personen met verstandelijke beperkingen onder de aandacht komt, wordt de focus vooral gelegd op medische aspecten of op verwachte uitdagingen van hun veroudering voor de gezondheidszorg en sociale dienstverlening. Een prominente, maar complexe kwestie in deze context is de vraag of eerder de ouderenzorg ofwel de gehandicaptenzorg het best geschikt is om aan hun behoeften te voldoen. Dit artikel bespreekt de bevindingen van een kwalitatief onderzoek waarin de zorgtrajecten van 10 ouder wordende personen met verstandelijke beperkingen gereconstrueerd en onderzocht werden. Op basis van open interviews met de betrokkenen zelf en met relevante actoren uit hun formele en informele netwerk, identificeerden we mechanismen in de samenleving die ouderen met verstandelijke beperkingen toegang geven of ontzeggen tot bepaalde zorginstellingen of welzijnsvoorzieningen. Bovendien ontdekten we bekommernissen, interesses en aspiraties die veelal onbelicht blijven. Dit toont de noodzaak om voorbij te gaan aan het debat over toegang krijgen tot een bestaande plaats, en daagt ons uit om op zoek te gaan naar mogelijkheden en strategieën om een plaats te creëren om te bestaan, ook op oudere leeftijd.KEYWORDS: Quality of lifebelongingintellectual disabilitieselderlyageing in placeTREFWOORDEN: kwaliteit van levenerbij horenverstandelijke beperkingouderenter plaatse ouder worden Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recent policy plans are focusing on the introduction of an adjusted scaling instrument (BelRAI) that should allow a more ‘global assessment of a person’s physical, cognitive, psychological and social care and support needs’ (Beke, Citation2019, p. 21 – Policy note on Welfare, Public health, family and poverty reduction 2019–2024).Additional informationNotes on contributorsTineke SchiettecatTineke Schiettecat works as a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy (Ghent University). She is also lecturer at the department of Social Educational Care Work, and affiliated as a researcher to the EQUALITY Research Collective and eCO-CITY (HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts). Her research interests involve qualitative research about social work and welfare rights in relation to issues of poverty, disability and age.Jorrit CampensJorrit Campens obtained a master's degree in nursing and midwifery and, in 2015, started working at the HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts as a lecturer in the bachelor's program in nursing and as a researcher focusing on older adults with intellectual disabilities and students' attitudes toward older people. Since 2020, Jorrit has also been working at Vrije Universiteit Brussel as a doctoral student contributing to the Digital Ageing project. His work is centered around the development of typologies of internet (non-)users among older adults.Griet RoetsProf. dr. Griet Roets is Professor at the Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy at Ghent University. Her work focuses on social work, citizenship and social rights, intersections of poverty, disability, gender, and age, and the way in which social services and social workers carry or critically reflect on and question broader societal developments. Her research and teaching interest includes qualitative and interpretative research, and dimensions of research ethics.Nico De WitteProf. dr. Nico De Witte is one of the founders of the elderly needs studies and has been exploring the intersections and needs of elderly people living in Belgium and several other European Countries since 2002. He is currently a member of the faculty Psychology and Adult Educational Sciences at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and of the Faculty of Health Care, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts. His research interests are frailty, quality of life, quality of care, loneliness in later life, the added value of digital applications for the elderly in their daily lives and in healthcare provision, etc.Joan LesseliersJoan Lesseliers is a lecturer at the Department of Social-Educational Care Work and researcher at the Research Centre - Substance Use and Psychosocial Risk Behaviours (SUPRB), both at HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts.Ilse GoethalsIlse Goethals is lecturer at the department of Social Educational Care Work, and researcher at the EQUALITY Research Collective, both situated within Ghent University of Applied Sciences and Arts. She is also an affiliated researcher at Ghent University, department of Special Needs Education. She has experience in applied scientific research which mainly focusses on optimizing the quality of life of socially vulnerable populations by analysing treatment processes (on an organisational-, system-, care providers- and/or client-level) and assessing implementation of treatment interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Social Work provides a forum for the social professions in all parts of Europe and beyond. It analyses and promotes European and international developments in social work, social policy, social service institutions, and strategies for social change by publishing refereed papers on contemporary key issues. Contributions include theoretical debates, empirical studies, research notes, country perspectives, and reviews. It maintains an interdisciplinary perspective which recognises positively the diversity of cultural and conceptual traditions in which the social professions of Europe are grounded. In particular it examines emerging European paradigms in methodology and comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信