学术搜索过程中人工智能搜索工具测试的思考

Lorna Wildgaard, Anne Vils, Solveig Sandal Johnsen
{"title":"学术搜索过程中人工智能搜索工具测试的思考","authors":"Lorna Wildgaard, Anne Vils, Solveig Sandal Johnsen","doi":"10.53377/lq.13567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic search literacy and artificial intelligence (AI) search are a strategic focus of future researcher support strategies at the Royal Library and affiliated university libraries in Denmark. The ambition is to integrate AI search tools in teaching and services that support literature seeking and hence improve the efficiency of the academic search process.
 This paper is a reflection on the results of tests of AI powered search tools conducted at the Royal Library, Denmark. Information specialists and researchers took part in think-aloud tests, Hackathon and expert quality assessment in the period of April 2021 – February 2022.
 Our observations point to a) opportunities in AI search to let go of traditional approaches to search and broaden our perception of how an academic search can be conducted, b) potential of AI search interfaces to challenge ones preconception and reduce cognitive bias in the search process, c) concerns about the quality of scientific literature AI search identifies, and d) barriers that need to be overcome before practical implementation of Ai search tools become viable in academic searches.
 More research is needed to show the usefulness of AI search tools in systematic search and guidance on how to report the use of them","PeriodicalId":475032,"journal":{"name":"Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on tests of AI-search tools in the academic search process\",\"authors\":\"Lorna Wildgaard, Anne Vils, Solveig Sandal Johnsen\",\"doi\":\"10.53377/lq.13567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic search literacy and artificial intelligence (AI) search are a strategic focus of future researcher support strategies at the Royal Library and affiliated university libraries in Denmark. The ambition is to integrate AI search tools in teaching and services that support literature seeking and hence improve the efficiency of the academic search process.
 This paper is a reflection on the results of tests of AI powered search tools conducted at the Royal Library, Denmark. Information specialists and researchers took part in think-aloud tests, Hackathon and expert quality assessment in the period of April 2021 – February 2022.
 Our observations point to a) opportunities in AI search to let go of traditional approaches to search and broaden our perception of how an academic search can be conducted, b) potential of AI search interfaces to challenge ones preconception and reduce cognitive bias in the search process, c) concerns about the quality of scientific literature AI search identifies, and d) barriers that need to be overcome before practical implementation of Ai search tools become viable in academic searches.
 More research is needed to show the usefulness of AI search tools in systematic search and guidance on how to report the use of them\",\"PeriodicalId\":475032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.13567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.13567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术搜索素养和人工智能(AI)搜索是丹麦皇家图书馆及其附属大学图书馆未来研究人员支持战略的战略重点。其目标是将人工智能搜索工具整合到支持文献检索的教学和服务中,从而提高学术搜索过程的效率。 这篇论文是对在丹麦皇家图书馆进行的人工智能搜索工具测试结果的反思。信息专家和研究人员在2021年4月至2022年2月期间参加了有声思维测试、黑客马拉松和专家素质评估。我们的观察表明:a)人工智能搜索有机会放弃传统的搜索方法,拓宽我们对如何进行学术搜索的看法;b)人工智能搜索界面有可能挑战人们的先入之见,减少搜索过程中的认知偏见;c)对人工智能搜索识别的科学文献质量的担忧;d)人工智能搜索工具在学术搜索中实际应用之前需要克服的障碍。 需要更多的研究来证明人工智能搜索工具在系统搜索中的有用性,并指导如何报告它们的使用情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on tests of AI-search tools in the academic search process
Academic search literacy and artificial intelligence (AI) search are a strategic focus of future researcher support strategies at the Royal Library and affiliated university libraries in Denmark. The ambition is to integrate AI search tools in teaching and services that support literature seeking and hence improve the efficiency of the academic search process. This paper is a reflection on the results of tests of AI powered search tools conducted at the Royal Library, Denmark. Information specialists and researchers took part in think-aloud tests, Hackathon and expert quality assessment in the period of April 2021 – February 2022. Our observations point to a) opportunities in AI search to let go of traditional approaches to search and broaden our perception of how an academic search can be conducted, b) potential of AI search interfaces to challenge ones preconception and reduce cognitive bias in the search process, c) concerns about the quality of scientific literature AI search identifies, and d) barriers that need to be overcome before practical implementation of Ai search tools become viable in academic searches. More research is needed to show the usefulness of AI search tools in systematic search and guidance on how to report the use of them
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信