Seung Yeon Lee, Janet K. Kempf, Sara M. Miller, Eileen O’Neill Estes
{"title":"教师对艺术治疗认证的认知调查","authors":"Seung Yeon Lee, Janet K. Kempf, Sara M. Miller, Eileen O’Neill Estes","doi":"10.1080/07421656.2023.2267964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn 2015, programmatic accreditation by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP) was initiated for art therapy education. The study examined art therapy faculty’s perception of the CAAHEP accreditation process through a nation-wide online survey research. The mixed-method analysis supports the complexity of the current art therapy programmatic accreditation as perceived by faculty. Three main themes were identified: (1) accreditation as accountability, (2) additional burden and time-consuming, and (3) limited support and skill mismatch. The findings suggest that programmatic accreditation brings both benefits and challenges while also supporting the development of quality accreditation procedures for art therapy education.Keywords: Art therapy educationprogrammatic accreditationfaculty’s perceptionaccountabilityburden Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSeung Yeon LeeSeung Yeon Lee, EdD, ATR-BC, LCAT, is a Clinical Assistant Professor of the Graduate Art Therapy Program, New York University, New York, NY.Janet K. KempfJanet K. Kempf, MA, ATR-BC, LPC, NCC, LCDC II, is a doctoral student in the Counselor Education program at The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.Sara M. MillerSara M. Miller, PhD, ATCS, LCPC, is a Senior Research Specialist at the University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.Eileen O’Neill EstesEileen O’Neill Estes, PhD, LPCA, LPAT-S, ATR-BC, is an Assistant Professor of Art Therapy Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.","PeriodicalId":8492,"journal":{"name":"Art Therapy","volume":"10 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey on Faculty’s Perceptions of Art Therapy Accreditation\",\"authors\":\"Seung Yeon Lee, Janet K. Kempf, Sara M. Miller, Eileen O’Neill Estes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07421656.2023.2267964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn 2015, programmatic accreditation by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP) was initiated for art therapy education. The study examined art therapy faculty’s perception of the CAAHEP accreditation process through a nation-wide online survey research. The mixed-method analysis supports the complexity of the current art therapy programmatic accreditation as perceived by faculty. Three main themes were identified: (1) accreditation as accountability, (2) additional burden and time-consuming, and (3) limited support and skill mismatch. The findings suggest that programmatic accreditation brings both benefits and challenges while also supporting the development of quality accreditation procedures for art therapy education.Keywords: Art therapy educationprogrammatic accreditationfaculty’s perceptionaccountabilityburden Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSeung Yeon LeeSeung Yeon Lee, EdD, ATR-BC, LCAT, is a Clinical Assistant Professor of the Graduate Art Therapy Program, New York University, New York, NY.Janet K. KempfJanet K. Kempf, MA, ATR-BC, LPC, NCC, LCDC II, is a doctoral student in the Counselor Education program at The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.Sara M. MillerSara M. Miller, PhD, ATCS, LCPC, is a Senior Research Specialist at the University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.Eileen O’Neill EstesEileen O’Neill Estes, PhD, LPCA, LPAT-S, ATR-BC, is an Assistant Professor of Art Therapy Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Therapy\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2023.2267964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2023.2267964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2015年,美国联合健康教育项目认证委员会(CAAHEP)启动了艺术治疗教育项目认证。该研究通过一项全国性的在线调查研究,调查了艺术治疗教师对CAAHEP认证过程的看法。混合方法分析支持当前艺术治疗项目认证的复杂性,因为教师认为。确定了三个主要主题:(1)作为问责制的认证;(2)额外的负担和时间;(3)有限的支持和技能不匹配。研究结果表明,程序化认证带来了好处和挑战,同时也支持了艺术治疗教育质量认证程序的发展。关键词:艺术治疗教育课程认证教师感知责任负担披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。李承延,EdD, ATR-BC, LCAT,是纽约大学研究生艺术治疗项目的临床助理教授,纽约,纽约。Janet K. Kempf, MA, ATR-BC, LPC, NCC, LCDC II,是俄亥俄州托莱多市托莱多大学辅导员教育项目的博士生。Sara M. Miller,博士,ATCS, LCPC,是伊利诺斯州芝加哥伊利诺斯大学的高级研究专家。eileen O 'Neill Estes,博士,LPCA, LPAT-S, ATR-BC,是肯塔基州路易斯维尔路易斯维尔大学艺术治疗项目助理教授。
A Survey on Faculty’s Perceptions of Art Therapy Accreditation
AbstractIn 2015, programmatic accreditation by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP) was initiated for art therapy education. The study examined art therapy faculty’s perception of the CAAHEP accreditation process through a nation-wide online survey research. The mixed-method analysis supports the complexity of the current art therapy programmatic accreditation as perceived by faculty. Three main themes were identified: (1) accreditation as accountability, (2) additional burden and time-consuming, and (3) limited support and skill mismatch. The findings suggest that programmatic accreditation brings both benefits and challenges while also supporting the development of quality accreditation procedures for art therapy education.Keywords: Art therapy educationprogrammatic accreditationfaculty’s perceptionaccountabilityburden Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSeung Yeon LeeSeung Yeon Lee, EdD, ATR-BC, LCAT, is a Clinical Assistant Professor of the Graduate Art Therapy Program, New York University, New York, NY.Janet K. KempfJanet K. Kempf, MA, ATR-BC, LPC, NCC, LCDC II, is a doctoral student in the Counselor Education program at The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.Sara M. MillerSara M. Miller, PhD, ATCS, LCPC, is a Senior Research Specialist at the University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.Eileen O’Neill EstesEileen O’Neill Estes, PhD, LPCA, LPAT-S, ATR-BC, is an Assistant Professor of Art Therapy Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.