交叉实践中诞生的关怀伦理:女性主义堕胎陪伴模式

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Signs Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/725843
Julia McReynolds-Pérez, Katrina Kimport, Chiara Bercu, Carolina Cisternas, Emily Wilkinson Salamea, Ruth Zurbriggen, Heidi Moseson
{"title":"交叉实践中诞生的关怀伦理:女性主义堕胎陪伴模式","authors":"Julia McReynolds-Pérez, Katrina Kimport, Chiara Bercu, Carolina Cisternas, Emily Wilkinson Salamea, Ruth Zurbriggen, Heidi Moseson","doi":"10.1086/725843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abortion in the global South is highly restricted. The social, economic, and health problems engendered by this restriction are often relegated to the discipline of public health and considered a technical problem to be solved through policy change, international pressure, and Northern aid. In recent years, however, local activists around the world have responded to legal restrictions by counseling and supporting abortion seekers online, by phone, and in person in self-managing their own abortions. In Latin America, this direct-action tactic, known as abortion accompaniment, is led largely by self-identified feminist collectives. In this article, we examine the feminist orientation of abortion accompaniment, considering how the model engages with a feminist ethic of care, reflexivity, and intersectionality—and to what effect. Drawing on in-depth interviews with abortion accompaniers in Argentina, Chile, and Ecuador, we show that abortion accompaniment cannot be understood as merely a response to legal restrictions. Rather, accompaniment is activism rooted in a feminist approach. The model of abortion care implemented by accompaniment groups includes direct action, justice, and listening. We argue that abortion accompaniment is a unique and innovative feminist praxis that is shaped by both previous feminist intellectual commitments and feminist emotional connections forged through the abortion process, resulting in a reflexive feminist theoretical model that centers care and exists fully outside the state and the formal health care system.","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics of Care Born in Intersectional Praxis: A Feminist Abortion Accompaniment Model\",\"authors\":\"Julia McReynolds-Pérez, Katrina Kimport, Chiara Bercu, Carolina Cisternas, Emily Wilkinson Salamea, Ruth Zurbriggen, Heidi Moseson\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abortion in the global South is highly restricted. The social, economic, and health problems engendered by this restriction are often relegated to the discipline of public health and considered a technical problem to be solved through policy change, international pressure, and Northern aid. In recent years, however, local activists around the world have responded to legal restrictions by counseling and supporting abortion seekers online, by phone, and in person in self-managing their own abortions. In Latin America, this direct-action tactic, known as abortion accompaniment, is led largely by self-identified feminist collectives. In this article, we examine the feminist orientation of abortion accompaniment, considering how the model engages with a feminist ethic of care, reflexivity, and intersectionality—and to what effect. Drawing on in-depth interviews with abortion accompaniers in Argentina, Chile, and Ecuador, we show that abortion accompaniment cannot be understood as merely a response to legal restrictions. Rather, accompaniment is activism rooted in a feminist approach. The model of abortion care implemented by accompaniment groups includes direct action, justice, and listening. We argue that abortion accompaniment is a unique and innovative feminist praxis that is shaped by both previous feminist intellectual commitments and feminist emotional connections forged through the abortion process, resulting in a reflexive feminist theoretical model that centers care and exists fully outside the state and the formal health care system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725843\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

堕胎在南半球受到严格限制。这种限制所造成的社会、经济和健康问题往往被归入公共卫生学科,并被认为是一个技术问题,需要通过政策改变、国际压力和北方援助来解决。然而,近年来,世界各地的当地积极分子通过在线、电话和亲自咨询和支持堕胎寻求者自我管理自己的堕胎,来回应法律限制。在拉丁美洲,这种直接行动策略,被称为堕胎陪伴,主要是由自我认同的女权主义团体领导的。在这篇文章中,我们研究了堕胎陪伴的女权主义取向,考虑了这种模式如何与女权主义的关怀伦理、反身性和交叉性相结合,以及产生了什么影响。通过对阿根廷、智利和厄瓜多尔堕胎陪伴者的深度访谈,我们发现陪伴堕胎不能仅仅被理解为对法律限制的回应。相反,伴奏是根植于女权主义方法的激进主义。陪伴小组实施的流产护理模式包括直接行动、公正和倾听。我们认为堕胎陪伴是一种独特而创新的女权主义实践,它是由先前的女权主义知识承诺和女性主义在堕胎过程中形成的情感联系共同塑造的,从而形成了一种以护理为中心的反思性女权主义理论模式,并完全存在于国家和正式的医疗保健系统之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics of Care Born in Intersectional Praxis: A Feminist Abortion Accompaniment Model
Abortion in the global South is highly restricted. The social, economic, and health problems engendered by this restriction are often relegated to the discipline of public health and considered a technical problem to be solved through policy change, international pressure, and Northern aid. In recent years, however, local activists around the world have responded to legal restrictions by counseling and supporting abortion seekers online, by phone, and in person in self-managing their own abortions. In Latin America, this direct-action tactic, known as abortion accompaniment, is led largely by self-identified feminist collectives. In this article, we examine the feminist orientation of abortion accompaniment, considering how the model engages with a feminist ethic of care, reflexivity, and intersectionality—and to what effect. Drawing on in-depth interviews with abortion accompaniers in Argentina, Chile, and Ecuador, we show that abortion accompaniment cannot be understood as merely a response to legal restrictions. Rather, accompaniment is activism rooted in a feminist approach. The model of abortion care implemented by accompaniment groups includes direct action, justice, and listening. We argue that abortion accompaniment is a unique and innovative feminist praxis that is shaped by both previous feminist intellectual commitments and feminist emotional connections forged through the abortion process, resulting in a reflexive feminist theoretical model that centers care and exists fully outside the state and the formal health care system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信