修正主义的变化

Lampas Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5117/lam2023.3.002.kloo
Jacqueline Klooster
{"title":"修正主义的变化","authors":"Jacqueline Klooster","doi":"10.5117/lam2023.3.002.kloo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the phenomenon of modern retellings of Greco-Roman myth from a female perspective is not new in and of itself (e.g. Christa Wolf’s Kassandra, 1983, and Medea, 1996, Margaret Atwood’s Penelopiad, 2005, and Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia, 2008), more recent years, starting from approximately 2017, have seen an unprecedented boom in the publication of such novels. In this contribution, I outline the phenomenon of rewriting with the help of some literary theory (Genette, Plate) and I try to chart what is at stake in these recent retellings. Does the choice for a female perspective also imply a feminist stance? Why are these stories being rewritten at this time? And why are they so hugely popular?","PeriodicalId":477755,"journal":{"name":"Lampas","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De revisionistische muze\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Klooster\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/lam2023.3.002.kloo\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the phenomenon of modern retellings of Greco-Roman myth from a female perspective is not new in and of itself (e.g. Christa Wolf’s Kassandra, 1983, and Medea, 1996, Margaret Atwood’s Penelopiad, 2005, and Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia, 2008), more recent years, starting from approximately 2017, have seen an unprecedented boom in the publication of such novels. In this contribution, I outline the phenomenon of rewriting with the help of some literary theory (Genette, Plate) and I try to chart what is at stake in these recent retellings. Does the choice for a female perspective also imply a feminist stance? Why are these stories being rewritten at this time? And why are they so hugely popular?\",\"PeriodicalId\":477755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lampas\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lampas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/lam2023.3.002.kloo\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lampas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/lam2023.3.002.kloo","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然从女性视角重述希腊罗马神话的现代现象本身并不新鲜(例如,克里斯塔·沃尔夫的《卡珊德拉》,1983年,《美狄亚》,1996年,玛格丽特·阿特伍德的《佩内洛普阿德》,2005年,乌苏拉·勒奎恩的《拉维尼娅》,2008年),但近年来,大约从2017年开始,这类小说的出版出现了前所未有的繁荣。在这篇文章中,我在一些文学理论(Genette, Plate)的帮助下概述了重写现象,并试图描绘出这些最近的重述所面临的危险。选择女性视角是否也意味着女权主义立场?为什么这些故事在这个时候被重写?为什么它们如此受欢迎?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De revisionistische muze
Although the phenomenon of modern retellings of Greco-Roman myth from a female perspective is not new in and of itself (e.g. Christa Wolf’s Kassandra, 1983, and Medea, 1996, Margaret Atwood’s Penelopiad, 2005, and Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia, 2008), more recent years, starting from approximately 2017, have seen an unprecedented boom in the publication of such novels. In this contribution, I outline the phenomenon of rewriting with the help of some literary theory (Genette, Plate) and I try to chart what is at stake in these recent retellings. Does the choice for a female perspective also imply a feminist stance? Why are these stories being rewritten at this time? And why are they so hugely popular?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信