{"title":"专项投资合同参与人的税收","authors":"R. A. Shepenko, A. G. Isaev","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).85-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"16. Balandina A.S. Analysis of theoretical aspects of tax benefits and tax preferences. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvenogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2011, no. 4 (16), pp. 105–110. (In Russ.). 17. Danilova V.V. Tax preferences: the concept, types, goals and procedures for obtaining. Oplata truda: bukhgalterskii uchet i nalogooblozhenie, 2022, no. 4, pp. 19–26. (In Russ.). 18. Wells D.A. The Theory and Practice of Taxation. New York, D. Appleton and Company Publ., 1900. 666 p. 19. Chua A.T. Precedent and Principles of WTO Panel Jurisprudence. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 1998, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 171–196. 20. Belousov A.L. Preferential regimes for conduct of business: regulation problems and law improvement areas. Khozyaistvo i pravo = Economy and Law, 2022, no. 10, pp. 30–41. (In Russ.). 21. Belousov A.L. Legal aspects of formation and development of special investment contracts in the Russian Federation. Legal Bulletin, 2022, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 9–16. (In Russ).The subject. The preferential tax regime provided to the participants of special investment contracts has been functioning in the Russian legal system for about 8 years. Despite the systematic \"fine-tuning\" of its legal regulation, taxpayers still face the legislative gaps and contradictions of separate normative provisions entailing tax risks. It seems appropriate to put forward the hypothesis that the existing tax treatment of the participants of special investment contracts is not devoid of these drawbacks, especially in terms of regional regulation, and could be improved. Purpose of the study. The article represents an attempt to verify the aforementioned hypothesis and deals with selected provisions of the Russian legislation regulating preferential tax regime for participants of special investment contracts, which in addition to the Russian Tax Code includes the Federal Law \"On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation\", regional and municipal normative legal acts. Methodology. The methodological basis of this study are general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), private scientific methods (interpretation of legal acts), as well as content analysis, study of reports and analytical references of governmental organizations. The main results. The study revealed that the Russian legislation, mainly regional and municipal, is not fully developed. As a consequence, the preferential tax regime for the participants of special investment contracts cannot efficiently function on the entire Russian territory. Also, the regulatory framework adopted at the federal level uses incorrect terminological apparatus in terms of defining tax support measures available to participants of special investment contracts, which entails tax risks for them. Conclusions. The revealed drawbacks of the preferential tax regime for participants of special investment contracts can be leveled by means of point-by-point amendments to the federal legislation. To this end, the authors of the present study propose specific steps to overcome these drawbacks.","PeriodicalId":40342,"journal":{"name":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxation of special investment contracts participants\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Shepenko, A. G. Isaev\",\"doi\":\"10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).85-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"16. Balandina A.S. Analysis of theoretical aspects of tax benefits and tax preferences. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvenogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2011, no. 4 (16), pp. 105–110. (In Russ.). 17. Danilova V.V. Tax preferences: the concept, types, goals and procedures for obtaining. Oplata truda: bukhgalterskii uchet i nalogooblozhenie, 2022, no. 4, pp. 19–26. (In Russ.). 18. Wells D.A. The Theory and Practice of Taxation. New York, D. Appleton and Company Publ., 1900. 666 p. 19. Chua A.T. Precedent and Principles of WTO Panel Jurisprudence. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 1998, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 171–196. 20. Belousov A.L. Preferential regimes for conduct of business: regulation problems and law improvement areas. Khozyaistvo i pravo = Economy and Law, 2022, no. 10, pp. 30–41. (In Russ.). 21. Belousov A.L. Legal aspects of formation and development of special investment contracts in the Russian Federation. Legal Bulletin, 2022, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 9–16. (In Russ).The subject. The preferential tax regime provided to the participants of special investment contracts has been functioning in the Russian legal system for about 8 years. Despite the systematic \\\"fine-tuning\\\" of its legal regulation, taxpayers still face the legislative gaps and contradictions of separate normative provisions entailing tax risks. It seems appropriate to put forward the hypothesis that the existing tax treatment of the participants of special investment contracts is not devoid of these drawbacks, especially in terms of regional regulation, and could be improved. Purpose of the study. The article represents an attempt to verify the aforementioned hypothesis and deals with selected provisions of the Russian legislation regulating preferential tax regime for participants of special investment contracts, which in addition to the Russian Tax Code includes the Federal Law \\\"On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation\\\", regional and municipal normative legal acts. Methodology. The methodological basis of this study are general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), private scientific methods (interpretation of legal acts), as well as content analysis, study of reports and analytical references of governmental organizations. The main results. The study revealed that the Russian legislation, mainly regional and municipal, is not fully developed. As a consequence, the preferential tax regime for the participants of special investment contracts cannot efficiently function on the entire Russian territory. Also, the regulatory framework adopted at the federal level uses incorrect terminological apparatus in terms of defining tax support measures available to participants of special investment contracts, which entails tax risks for them. Conclusions. The revealed drawbacks of the preferential tax regime for participants of special investment contracts can be leveled by means of point-by-point amendments to the federal legislation. To this end, the authors of the present study propose specific steps to overcome these drawbacks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).85-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).85-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
16. 税收优惠和税收优惠的理论分析。《托木斯克国立大学学报》,2011年第1期。4(16),第105-110页。(俄国人)。17. 税收优惠:概念、类型、目标和获得程序。Oplata truda: bukhgalterskii uchet i nalogooblozhenie, 2022, no. 1。4,第19-26页。(俄国人)。18. 《税收的理论与实践》。纽约,D. Appleton and Company public。, 1900年。666 p. 19。蔡安泰。WTO专家组判例与原则。《伯克利国际法杂志》,1998年,第16卷。2,第171-196页。20.别洛乌索夫·阿勒:商业行为的优惠制度:监管问题和法律改进领域。《经济与法律》,2022年第1期。10,第30-41页。(俄国人)。21. 别洛乌索夫A.L.俄罗斯联邦特别投资合同形成和发展的法律问题。《法制通报》,2022年第7卷第7期。4,第9-16页。(俄国人)。这个话题。向特别投资合同参与者提供的优惠税收制度在俄罗斯法律制度中已经实施了大约8年。尽管对其法律法规进行了系统的“微调”,但纳税人仍然面临着立法空白和单独规范条款带来税收风险的矛盾。提出这样一个假设似乎是恰当的,即对特殊投资合同参与者的现行税收待遇并非没有这些缺点,特别是在区域管制方面,并且可以加以改进。研究目的:这篇文章试图验证上述假设,并讨论了关于特别投资合同参与者的优惠税收制度的俄罗斯立法的某些规定,这些规定除俄罗斯税法外还包括“关于俄罗斯联邦工业政策”的联邦法、区域和市政规范性法律行为。方法。本研究的方法论基础是一般科学方法(分析与综合、归纳与演绎)、私人科学方法(法律行为的解释)以及内容分析、报告研究和政府组织的分析参考。主要结果。这项研究表明,俄罗斯的立法,主要是区域和市政立法,没有得到充分发展。因此,特别投资合同参与者的优惠税收制度无法在整个俄罗斯领土上有效地发挥作用。此外,在联邦一级采用的监管框架在定义特别投资合同参与者可获得的税收支持措施方面使用了不正确的术语,这给他们带来了税收风险。结论。对特别投资合同参与者的优惠税收制度所暴露的缺点可以通过对联邦立法逐点修正的办法加以弥补。为此,本研究的作者提出了克服这些缺点的具体步骤。
Taxation of special investment contracts participants
16. Balandina A.S. Analysis of theoretical aspects of tax benefits and tax preferences. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvenogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2011, no. 4 (16), pp. 105–110. (In Russ.). 17. Danilova V.V. Tax preferences: the concept, types, goals and procedures for obtaining. Oplata truda: bukhgalterskii uchet i nalogooblozhenie, 2022, no. 4, pp. 19–26. (In Russ.). 18. Wells D.A. The Theory and Practice of Taxation. New York, D. Appleton and Company Publ., 1900. 666 p. 19. Chua A.T. Precedent and Principles of WTO Panel Jurisprudence. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 1998, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 171–196. 20. Belousov A.L. Preferential regimes for conduct of business: regulation problems and law improvement areas. Khozyaistvo i pravo = Economy and Law, 2022, no. 10, pp. 30–41. (In Russ.). 21. Belousov A.L. Legal aspects of formation and development of special investment contracts in the Russian Federation. Legal Bulletin, 2022, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 9–16. (In Russ).The subject. The preferential tax regime provided to the participants of special investment contracts has been functioning in the Russian legal system for about 8 years. Despite the systematic "fine-tuning" of its legal regulation, taxpayers still face the legislative gaps and contradictions of separate normative provisions entailing tax risks. It seems appropriate to put forward the hypothesis that the existing tax treatment of the participants of special investment contracts is not devoid of these drawbacks, especially in terms of regional regulation, and could be improved. Purpose of the study. The article represents an attempt to verify the aforementioned hypothesis and deals with selected provisions of the Russian legislation regulating preferential tax regime for participants of special investment contracts, which in addition to the Russian Tax Code includes the Federal Law "On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation", regional and municipal normative legal acts. Methodology. The methodological basis of this study are general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), private scientific methods (interpretation of legal acts), as well as content analysis, study of reports and analytical references of governmental organizations. The main results. The study revealed that the Russian legislation, mainly regional and municipal, is not fully developed. As a consequence, the preferential tax regime for the participants of special investment contracts cannot efficiently function on the entire Russian territory. Also, the regulatory framework adopted at the federal level uses incorrect terminological apparatus in terms of defining tax support measures available to participants of special investment contracts, which entails tax risks for them. Conclusions. The revealed drawbacks of the preferential tax regime for participants of special investment contracts can be leveled by means of point-by-point amendments to the federal legislation. To this end, the authors of the present study propose specific steps to overcome these drawbacks.