Qun Cao, Zhengshun Cheng, Longfei Xiao, Mingyue Liu
{"title":"半潜式风力机三种备选系泊系统在中等水深下的动力分析","authors":"Qun Cao, Zhengshun Cheng, Longfei Xiao, Mingyue Liu","doi":"10.1115/1.4063854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Three forms of mooring system in 60 m water depth are proposed for SPIC (Semi-submersible with Partially Inclined Columns) concept FWT (Floating Wind Turbine). One is a simple form with only catenary lines, and the others are hybrid forms including clump weights. The clumps are attached to the suspended section for Hybrid form1 and the bottom section for Hybrid form2. Hybrid form2 achieves the smallest line length and chain weight. Three proposals can be evaluated through mooring line characteristics, dynamic responses, utilization factors and cost analysis. Hybrid form2 allows for smallest pretension, and largest stiffness and nonlinearity only at large offsets. Under operational conditions, the mean surge for Hybrid form1 and Hybrid form2 is similar, but the fairlead tension is significantly smaller for Hybrid form2. Under survival condition, the clumps of Hybrid form2 are lifted up and put down, leading to large wave-frequency components of line tension. Among the three forms, the hybrid form2 can limit the FWT to the smallest offset range while also controlling the mean line tension to a level similar to the other two forms. Under normal working conditions and accidental conditions with single line broken, the maximal surge motions of FWT under the restraint of three forms all meet the design requirements. The mooring line strength of the three forms meets the requirements in ULS (ultimate limit state) and ALS (accidental limit state) analysis. Among them, the utilization coefficient of Hybrid form2 is closest to 1, demonstrating its best economic performance.","PeriodicalId":50106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Analysis of Three Alternative Mooring Systems for a Semi-submersible Wind Turbine in Intermediate Water Depth\",\"authors\":\"Qun Cao, Zhengshun Cheng, Longfei Xiao, Mingyue Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Three forms of mooring system in 60 m water depth are proposed for SPIC (Semi-submersible with Partially Inclined Columns) concept FWT (Floating Wind Turbine). One is a simple form with only catenary lines, and the others are hybrid forms including clump weights. The clumps are attached to the suspended section for Hybrid form1 and the bottom section for Hybrid form2. Hybrid form2 achieves the smallest line length and chain weight. Three proposals can be evaluated through mooring line characteristics, dynamic responses, utilization factors and cost analysis. Hybrid form2 allows for smallest pretension, and largest stiffness and nonlinearity only at large offsets. Under operational conditions, the mean surge for Hybrid form1 and Hybrid form2 is similar, but the fairlead tension is significantly smaller for Hybrid form2. Under survival condition, the clumps of Hybrid form2 are lifted up and put down, leading to large wave-frequency components of line tension. Among the three forms, the hybrid form2 can limit the FWT to the smallest offset range while also controlling the mean line tension to a level similar to the other two forms. Under normal working conditions and accidental conditions with single line broken, the maximal surge motions of FWT under the restraint of three forms all meet the design requirements. The mooring line strength of the three forms meets the requirements in ULS (ultimate limit state) and ALS (accidental limit state) analysis. Among them, the utilization coefficient of Hybrid form2 is closest to 1, demonstrating its best economic performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dynamic Analysis of Three Alternative Mooring Systems for a Semi-submersible Wind Turbine in Intermediate Water Depth
Abstract Three forms of mooring system in 60 m water depth are proposed for SPIC (Semi-submersible with Partially Inclined Columns) concept FWT (Floating Wind Turbine). One is a simple form with only catenary lines, and the others are hybrid forms including clump weights. The clumps are attached to the suspended section for Hybrid form1 and the bottom section for Hybrid form2. Hybrid form2 achieves the smallest line length and chain weight. Three proposals can be evaluated through mooring line characteristics, dynamic responses, utilization factors and cost analysis. Hybrid form2 allows for smallest pretension, and largest stiffness and nonlinearity only at large offsets. Under operational conditions, the mean surge for Hybrid form1 and Hybrid form2 is similar, but the fairlead tension is significantly smaller for Hybrid form2. Under survival condition, the clumps of Hybrid form2 are lifted up and put down, leading to large wave-frequency components of line tension. Among the three forms, the hybrid form2 can limit the FWT to the smallest offset range while also controlling the mean line tension to a level similar to the other two forms. Under normal working conditions and accidental conditions with single line broken, the maximal surge motions of FWT under the restraint of three forms all meet the design requirements. The mooring line strength of the three forms meets the requirements in ULS (ultimate limit state) and ALS (accidental limit state) analysis. Among them, the utilization coefficient of Hybrid form2 is closest to 1, demonstrating its best economic performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering is an international resource for original peer-reviewed research that advances the state of knowledge on all aspects of analysis, design, and technology development in ocean, offshore, arctic, and related fields. Its main goals are to provide a forum for timely and in-depth exchanges of scientific and technical information among researchers and engineers. It emphasizes fundamental research and development studies as well as review articles that offer either retrospective perspectives on well-established topics or exposures to innovative or novel developments. Case histories are not encouraged. The journal also documents significant developments in related fields and major accomplishments of renowned scientists by programming themed issues to record such events.
Scope: Offshore Mechanics, Drilling Technology, Fixed and Floating Production Systems; Ocean Engineering, Hydrodynamics, and Ship Motions; Ocean Climate Statistics, Storms, Extremes, and Hurricanes; Structural Mechanics; Safety, Reliability, Risk Assessment, and Uncertainty Quantification; Riser Mechanics, Cable and Mooring Dynamics, Pipeline and Subsea Technology; Materials Engineering, Fatigue, Fracture, Welding Technology, Non-destructive Testing, Inspection Technologies, Corrosion Protection and Control; Fluid-structure Interaction, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Flow and Vortex-Induced Vibrations; Marine and Offshore Geotechnics, Soil Mechanics, Soil-pipeline Interaction; Ocean Renewable Energy; Ocean Space Utilization and Aquaculture Engineering; Petroleum Technology; Polar and Arctic Science and Technology, Ice Mechanics, Arctic Drilling and Exploration, Arctic Structures, Ice-structure and Ship Interaction, Permafrost Engineering, Arctic and Thermal Design.