语言评价中使用批评性话语分析的另一个原因:从验证测试构念的角度进行批判性综合

Yeon-Sook Yi
{"title":"语言评价中使用批评性话语分析的另一个原因:从验证测试构念的角度进行批判性综合","authors":"Yeon-Sook Yi","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive diagnostic assessment is known for its capacity to provide detailed feedback to test-takers, which can inform instruction and guide learning. Besides this core strength of the assessment approach, the measurement procedure also works as a construct validation method in itself. Previous studies do not call attention to this aspect of cognitive diagnostic assessment and how the CDA validation can be different from existing construct validation methods. Thus, the purpose of this article is to synthesize cognitive diagnostic assessment research from a standpoint of seeing it as a construct validation procedure with a focus on its strengths as such. In doing so, the article closely examines studies that applied two earlier cognitive diagnostic models to learner data because they established the research foundations of CDA in language testing. Before looking into the details of the procedure of cognitive diagnostic assessment, the paper critically reviews non-CDA studies on construct validation in language testing. It then scrutinizes the methods and objects of construct validation in CDA research to find any significant differences. The paper concludes with several avenues of future research in CDA, which are related to the matter of verifying test constructs.","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another Reason for CDA in Language Assessment: A Critical Synthesis from a Perspective of Validating Test Constructs\",\"authors\":\"Yeon-Sook Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive diagnostic assessment is known for its capacity to provide detailed feedback to test-takers, which can inform instruction and guide learning. Besides this core strength of the assessment approach, the measurement procedure also works as a construct validation method in itself. Previous studies do not call attention to this aspect of cognitive diagnostic assessment and how the CDA validation can be different from existing construct validation methods. Thus, the purpose of this article is to synthesize cognitive diagnostic assessment research from a standpoint of seeing it as a construct validation procedure with a focus on its strengths as such. In doing so, the article closely examines studies that applied two earlier cognitive diagnostic models to learner data because they established the research foundations of CDA in language testing. Before looking into the details of the procedure of cognitive diagnostic assessment, the paper critically reviews non-CDA studies on construct validation in language testing. It then scrutinizes the methods and objects of construct validation in CDA research to find any significant differences. The paper concludes with several avenues of future research in CDA, which are related to the matter of verifying test constructs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Teaching Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Teaching Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知诊断评估以其向考生提供详细反馈的能力而闻名,这可以为教学和指导学习提供信息。除了评估方法的这一核心优势之外,测量过程本身也是一种结构验证方法。以往的研究并没有注意到认知诊断评估的这一方面,以及CDA验证与现有结构验证方法的不同之处。因此,本文的目的是综合认知诊断评估研究,从一个观点来看,它是一个结构验证程序,重点是它的优势。在此过程中,本文仔细考察了将两种早期认知诊断模型应用于学习者数据的研究,因为它们为语言测试中的批评性话语分析奠定了研究基础。在探讨认知诊断评估过程的细节之前,本文批判性地回顾了语言测试中关于构式验证的非批评性话语分析研究。然后详细分析了CDA研究中结构验证的方法和对象,以发现任何显著的差异。最后,本文提出了批评性数据分析的几个未来研究方向,这些方向都与测试结构的验证问题有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Another Reason for CDA in Language Assessment: A Critical Synthesis from a Perspective of Validating Test Constructs
Cognitive diagnostic assessment is known for its capacity to provide detailed feedback to test-takers, which can inform instruction and guide learning. Besides this core strength of the assessment approach, the measurement procedure also works as a construct validation method in itself. Previous studies do not call attention to this aspect of cognitive diagnostic assessment and how the CDA validation can be different from existing construct validation methods. Thus, the purpose of this article is to synthesize cognitive diagnostic assessment research from a standpoint of seeing it as a construct validation procedure with a focus on its strengths as such. In doing so, the article closely examines studies that applied two earlier cognitive diagnostic models to learner data because they established the research foundations of CDA in language testing. Before looking into the details of the procedure of cognitive diagnostic assessment, the paper critically reviews non-CDA studies on construct validation in language testing. It then scrutinizes the methods and objects of construct validation in CDA research to find any significant differences. The paper concludes with several avenues of future research in CDA, which are related to the matter of verifying test constructs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信