{"title":"效率与内生人口增长。孩子们有太多的权利吗?","authors":"Mikel Pérez-Nievas","doi":"10.3982/te4391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fertility rates are declining in many countries. But are fertility rates inefficiently low? This paper addresses this question by exploring the efficiency properties of equilibria in an overlapping generations setting with endogenous fertility and dynastic parental altruism, using the notion of <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"> <mi mathvariant=\"script\">P</mi> </math>‐efficiency proposed by Golosov, Jones and Tertilt (2007). In contrast to Schoonbroodt and Tertilt (2014), who show that any equilibrium for which nonnegativity constraints on intergenerational transfers are binding is <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"> <mi mathvariant=\"script\">A</mi> </math>‐inefficient (and, under the assumption that new lives always increase social welfare, also <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"> <mi mathvariant=\"script\">P</mi> </math>‐inefficient), I characterize symmetric, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"> <mi mathvariant=\"script\">P</mi> </math>‐efficient allocations as the equilibria arising from different distribution of rights among the agents, and show that many equilibria exhibiting binding constraints on transfers are <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"> <mi mathvariant=\"script\">P</mi> </math>‐efficient. To be more precise, except for dynamically inefficient equilibria, there is no need to alter children's rights so as to achieve efficiency.","PeriodicalId":46923,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Economics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency with endogenous population growth. Do children have too many rights?\",\"authors\":\"Mikel Pérez-Nievas\",\"doi\":\"10.3982/te4391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fertility rates are declining in many countries. But are fertility rates inefficiently low? This paper addresses this question by exploring the efficiency properties of equilibria in an overlapping generations setting with endogenous fertility and dynastic parental altruism, using the notion of <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"> <mi mathvariant=\\\"script\\\">P</mi> </math>‐efficiency proposed by Golosov, Jones and Tertilt (2007). In contrast to Schoonbroodt and Tertilt (2014), who show that any equilibrium for which nonnegativity constraints on intergenerational transfers are binding is <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"> <mi mathvariant=\\\"script\\\">A</mi> </math>‐inefficient (and, under the assumption that new lives always increase social welfare, also <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"> <mi mathvariant=\\\"script\\\">P</mi> </math>‐inefficient), I characterize symmetric, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"> <mi mathvariant=\\\"script\\\">P</mi> </math>‐efficient allocations as the equilibria arising from different distribution of rights among the agents, and show that many equilibria exhibiting binding constraints on transfers are <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"> <mi mathvariant=\\\"script\\\">P</mi> </math>‐efficient. To be more precise, except for dynamically inefficient equilibria, there is no need to alter children's rights so as to achieve efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3982/te4391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/te4391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficiency with endogenous population growth. Do children have too many rights?
Fertility rates are declining in many countries. But are fertility rates inefficiently low? This paper addresses this question by exploring the efficiency properties of equilibria in an overlapping generations setting with endogenous fertility and dynastic parental altruism, using the notion of ‐efficiency proposed by Golosov, Jones and Tertilt (2007). In contrast to Schoonbroodt and Tertilt (2014), who show that any equilibrium for which nonnegativity constraints on intergenerational transfers are binding is ‐inefficient (and, under the assumption that new lives always increase social welfare, also ‐inefficient), I characterize symmetric, ‐efficient allocations as the equilibria arising from different distribution of rights among the agents, and show that many equilibria exhibiting binding constraints on transfers are ‐efficient. To be more precise, except for dynamically inefficient equilibria, there is no need to alter children's rights so as to achieve efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Theoretical Economics publishes leading research in economic theory. It is published by the Econometric Society three times a year, in January, May, and September. All content is freely available. It is included in the Social Sciences Citation Index