{"title":"尊敬祖先","authors":"Paul Spickard, Kendall Lovely","doi":"10.1525/ch.2023.100.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universities and museums across the United States have possession of the remains of several hundred thousand Native Americans, collected by grave robbers in past generations and kept by anthropologists today. None gave permission for their remains to be used by “science.” The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), passed by Congress in 1990, requires these institutions to survey the remains, catalogue them, report them to the federal government, find their likely descendants, and return the ancestors promptly. Thirty-three years later, that law has been honored mainly in the breach. Only in the past two or three years have some institutions begun to get serious about this responsibility. Using the University of California, Santa Barbara, as a case study, this essay charts the long path by which well-intended anthropologists managed to see themselves as champions of Native rights, yet never take steps to return the ancestors’ remains. While the goals of scientific study may be presented as beneficial to all humankind, this case study shows how the claimed interests of scientists persistently trump the human rights of the people whose bones they keep for study. The essay also reports on the long-standing efforts of Chumash Indians to recover their ancestors, and on recent moves by the university to fulfill their legal and moral obligations.","PeriodicalId":43253,"journal":{"name":"CALIFORNIA HISTORY","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respecting the Ancestors\",\"authors\":\"Paul Spickard, Kendall Lovely\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/ch.2023.100.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Universities and museums across the United States have possession of the remains of several hundred thousand Native Americans, collected by grave robbers in past generations and kept by anthropologists today. None gave permission for their remains to be used by “science.” The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), passed by Congress in 1990, requires these institutions to survey the remains, catalogue them, report them to the federal government, find their likely descendants, and return the ancestors promptly. Thirty-three years later, that law has been honored mainly in the breach. Only in the past two or three years have some institutions begun to get serious about this responsibility. Using the University of California, Santa Barbara, as a case study, this essay charts the long path by which well-intended anthropologists managed to see themselves as champions of Native rights, yet never take steps to return the ancestors’ remains. While the goals of scientific study may be presented as beneficial to all humankind, this case study shows how the claimed interests of scientists persistently trump the human rights of the people whose bones they keep for study. The essay also reports on the long-standing efforts of Chumash Indians to recover their ancestors, and on recent moves by the university to fulfill their legal and moral obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CALIFORNIA HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CALIFORNIA HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/ch.2023.100.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALIFORNIA HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/ch.2023.100.4.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
美国各地的大学和博物馆都收藏着数十万印第安人的遗骸,这些遗骸在过去几代人中被盗墓贼收集,如今由人类学家保管。没有人允许他们的遗体用于“科学”研究。美国国会于1990年通过的《印第安人坟墓保护与归还法案》(NAGPRA)要求这些机构对遗骸进行调查、编目、向联邦政府报告,找到可能的后代,并迅速归还祖先。33年后,这项法律主要是在违反的情况下得到尊重。只是在过去的两三年里,一些机构才开始认真对待这一责任。本文以加州大学圣巴巴拉分校(University of California, Santa Barbara)为例,描绘了一条漫长的道路,在这条道路上,善意的人类学家设法将自己视为土著权利的捍卫者,但却从未采取措施归还祖先的遗骸。虽然科学研究的目标可能被认为是有益于全人类的,但这个案例研究表明,科学家所声称的利益如何始终凌驾于他们保留骨头供研究的人的人权之上。这篇文章还报道了丘马什印第安人长期以来为找回他们的祖先所做的努力,以及大学最近为履行他们的法律和道德义务所采取的行动。
Universities and museums across the United States have possession of the remains of several hundred thousand Native Americans, collected by grave robbers in past generations and kept by anthropologists today. None gave permission for their remains to be used by “science.” The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), passed by Congress in 1990, requires these institutions to survey the remains, catalogue them, report them to the federal government, find their likely descendants, and return the ancestors promptly. Thirty-three years later, that law has been honored mainly in the breach. Only in the past two or three years have some institutions begun to get serious about this responsibility. Using the University of California, Santa Barbara, as a case study, this essay charts the long path by which well-intended anthropologists managed to see themselves as champions of Native rights, yet never take steps to return the ancestors’ remains. While the goals of scientific study may be presented as beneficial to all humankind, this case study shows how the claimed interests of scientists persistently trump the human rights of the people whose bones they keep for study. The essay also reports on the long-standing efforts of Chumash Indians to recover their ancestors, and on recent moves by the university to fulfill their legal and moral obligations.