碳市场试点是否实现了碳减排和污染减排的协同控制?来自中国的准实验证据

IF 4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tiantian Yang, Lan Yi, Jing Li, Qingquan Liang
{"title":"碳市场试点是否实现了碳减排和污染减排的协同控制?来自中国的准实验证据","authors":"Tiantian Yang, Lan Yi, Jing Li, Qingquan Liang","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231201535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chinese government has emphasized the necessity of synergistic control for carbon abatement and pollution reduction in the protection of eco-environment, as part of the 14th Five-Year Plan and the Long-range Objectives Through the Year 2035. As an important tool to reduce CO 2 , the carbon market can also affect the air pollution synergistically. The study utilizes the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the impact of carbon market on carbon abatement, as well as the synergistic effect on different air pollutants. The study analyzes the mechanisms for carbon market to achieve synergistic control from the perspectives of “quantity” and “category” comprehensively. The findings indicate that: (1) carbon markets can reduce CO 2 significantly, with a synergistic effect mainly observed on SO 2 and soot (dust). These results remain robust when focusing on the industrial sector or adopting the PSM-DID estimation, etc.; (2) the mechanisms to achieve synergistic control vary among different air pollutants. Promotion of technology can only synergistically reduce SO 2 . Optimization of energy consumption structure is the top priority for reducing CO 2 . The most effective mechanism to achieve synergistic control of air pollutants is improvement of energy utilization efficiency; (3) to achieve synergistic control goals, the Chinese national market should prioritize industries that release both CO 2 and NOx in the rolling-out plan, enrich the trading tools, and formulate effective price signals.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have the pilot carbon markets achieved synergistic control of carbon abatement and pollution reduction? The quasi-experimental evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Tiantian Yang, Lan Yi, Jing Li, Qingquan Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305x231201535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Chinese government has emphasized the necessity of synergistic control for carbon abatement and pollution reduction in the protection of eco-environment, as part of the 14th Five-Year Plan and the Long-range Objectives Through the Year 2035. As an important tool to reduce CO 2 , the carbon market can also affect the air pollution synergistically. The study utilizes the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the impact of carbon market on carbon abatement, as well as the synergistic effect on different air pollutants. The study analyzes the mechanisms for carbon market to achieve synergistic control from the perspectives of “quantity” and “category” comprehensively. The findings indicate that: (1) carbon markets can reduce CO 2 significantly, with a synergistic effect mainly observed on SO 2 and soot (dust). These results remain robust when focusing on the industrial sector or adopting the PSM-DID estimation, etc.; (2) the mechanisms to achieve synergistic control vary among different air pollutants. Promotion of technology can only synergistically reduce SO 2 . Optimization of energy consumption structure is the top priority for reducing CO 2 . The most effective mechanism to achieve synergistic control of air pollutants is improvement of energy utilization efficiency; (3) to achieve synergistic control goals, the Chinese national market should prioritize industries that release both CO 2 and NOx in the rolling-out plan, enrich the trading tools, and formulate effective price signals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231201535\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231201535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国政府已将“十四五”规划和2035年远景目标纳入生态环境保护,强调在生态环境保护中推进碳减排和污染减排协同控制。碳市场作为减少CO 2的重要工具,也可以协同影响大气污染。本研究利用多期差分差分(DID)模型分析了碳市场对碳减排的影响,以及对不同大气污染物的协同效应。本文从“数量”和“类别”两个角度全面分析了碳市场实现协同控制的机制。研究结果表明:(1)碳市场对CO 2具有显著的抑制作用,其协同效应主要表现在so2和烟(尘)上。当专注于工业部门或采用PSM-DID估计等时,这些结果仍然稳健;(2)不同大气污染物实现协同控制的机制不同。技术的推广只能协同减少so2。优化能源消费结构是减少二氧化碳排放的重中之重。实现大气污染物协同治理的最有效机制是提高能源利用效率;(3)为实现协同控制目标,中国全国市场应在推出计划中优先考虑同时释放CO 2和NOx的行业,丰富交易工具,制定有效的价格信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Have the pilot carbon markets achieved synergistic control of carbon abatement and pollution reduction? The quasi-experimental evidence from China
The Chinese government has emphasized the necessity of synergistic control for carbon abatement and pollution reduction in the protection of eco-environment, as part of the 14th Five-Year Plan and the Long-range Objectives Through the Year 2035. As an important tool to reduce CO 2 , the carbon market can also affect the air pollution synergistically. The study utilizes the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the impact of carbon market on carbon abatement, as well as the synergistic effect on different air pollutants. The study analyzes the mechanisms for carbon market to achieve synergistic control from the perspectives of “quantity” and “category” comprehensively. The findings indicate that: (1) carbon markets can reduce CO 2 significantly, with a synergistic effect mainly observed on SO 2 and soot (dust). These results remain robust when focusing on the industrial sector or adopting the PSM-DID estimation, etc.; (2) the mechanisms to achieve synergistic control vary among different air pollutants. Promotion of technology can only synergistically reduce SO 2 . Optimization of energy consumption structure is the top priority for reducing CO 2 . The most effective mechanism to achieve synergistic control of air pollutants is improvement of energy utilization efficiency; (3) to achieve synergistic control goals, the Chinese national market should prioritize industries that release both CO 2 and NOx in the rolling-out plan, enrich the trading tools, and formulate effective price signals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Environment
Energy & Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信