{"title":"使用无创单通道电放大器对健康志愿者胃肠道活动进行可视化定量评估","authors":"Gen Aikawa, Misaki Kotani, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Mitsuki Ikeda, Tetsuya Hoshino, Nobuyuki Araki, Yuki Enomoto, Nobutake Shimojo, Yoshiaki Inoue","doi":"10.1155/2023/6902635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Electrogastrography and electroenterography are noninvasive methods for measuring gastric and intestinal electrical activities, respectively. Few studies have measured electroenterography in healthy humans; however, no studies have measured electrogastrography and electroenterography simultaneously. This study was performed to provide basic electrogastrography and electroenterography data for comparison with future studies in patients. Methods. Simultaneous preprandial and postprandial measurements of electrogastrography and electroenterography were taken for 30 min each in 50 healthy volunteers. Power spectrum analysis was performed to calculate dominant frequency, dominant power, and power ratio. Results. Gastric and small intestinal dominant frequencies were not significantly different between preprandial and postprandial periods. In preprandial and postprandial periods, normogastria was seen in 49 (98%) and 44 (88%) patients ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.063</mn> </math> ), bradygastria in 1 (2%) and 6 (12%) patients ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M2\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.063</mn> </math> ), and tachygastria in 0 (0%) patients, respectively. Dominant power was significantly increased in the stomach (828 [460–3203] μV2 vs. 1526 [759–2958] μV2, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M3\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.016</mn> </math> ) and small intestine (49 [27–86] μV2 vs. 68 [37–130] μV2, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M4\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ). The power ratio was 1.6 (0.9–2.5) in the stomach and 1.4 (1.0–2.5) in the small intestine. Body mass index showed a negative correlation with the stomach and small intestinal dominant power in preprandial and postprandial periods ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M5\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.566</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M6\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ; <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M7\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.534</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M8\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ; <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M9\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.459</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M10\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ; and <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M11\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.529</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M12\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> , respectively). The Bristol Stool Form Scale correlated positively with the small intestinal power ratio ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M13\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.430</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M14\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn> </math> ). Conclusion. There was no change in frequency in the stomach or small intestine, but power significantly increased in both the stomach and small intestine.","PeriodicalId":12480,"journal":{"name":"GastroHep","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualized Quantitative Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Activity in Healthy Volunteers Using a Noninvasive Single-Channel Electroamplifier\",\"authors\":\"Gen Aikawa, Misaki Kotani, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Mitsuki Ikeda, Tetsuya Hoshino, Nobuyuki Araki, Yuki Enomoto, Nobutake Shimojo, Yoshiaki Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6902635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Electrogastrography and electroenterography are noninvasive methods for measuring gastric and intestinal electrical activities, respectively. Few studies have measured electroenterography in healthy humans; however, no studies have measured electrogastrography and electroenterography simultaneously. This study was performed to provide basic electrogastrography and electroenterography data for comparison with future studies in patients. Methods. Simultaneous preprandial and postprandial measurements of electrogastrography and electroenterography were taken for 30 min each in 50 healthy volunteers. Power spectrum analysis was performed to calculate dominant frequency, dominant power, and power ratio. Results. Gastric and small intestinal dominant frequencies were not significantly different between preprandial and postprandial periods. In preprandial and postprandial periods, normogastria was seen in 49 (98%) and 44 (88%) patients ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M1\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.063</mn> </math> ), bradygastria in 1 (2%) and 6 (12%) patients ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M2\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.063</mn> </math> ), and tachygastria in 0 (0%) patients, respectively. Dominant power was significantly increased in the stomach (828 [460–3203] μV2 vs. 1526 [759–2958] μV2, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M3\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.016</mn> </math> ) and small intestine (49 [27–86] μV2 vs. 68 [37–130] μV2, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M4\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ). The power ratio was 1.6 (0.9–2.5) in the stomach and 1.4 (1.0–2.5) in the small intestine. Body mass index showed a negative correlation with the stomach and small intestinal dominant power in preprandial and postprandial periods ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M5\\\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.566</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M6\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ; <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M7\\\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.534</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M8\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ; <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M9\\\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.459</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M10\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> ; and <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M11\\\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.529</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M12\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> , respectively). The Bristol Stool Form Scale correlated positively with the small intestinal power ratio ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M13\\\"> <msub> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.430</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M14\\\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn> </math> ). Conclusion. There was no change in frequency in the stomach or small intestine, but power significantly increased in both the stomach and small intestine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GastroHep\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GastroHep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6902635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GastroHep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6902635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。胃电图和肠电图分别是测量胃和肠电活动的无创方法。很少有研究测量健康人的肠电图;然而,没有研究同时测量胃电图和肠电图。本研究的目的是提供基本的胃电图和肠电图数据,以便与未来的患者研究进行比较。方法。对50名健康志愿者分别进行30分钟的餐前和餐后胃电图和肠电图测量。功率谱分析计算主导频率、主导功率和功率比。结果。胃和小肠的优势频率在餐前和餐后无显著差异。在餐前和餐后,正常胃痛49例(98%)和44例(88%)(p = 0.063),胃缓1例(2%)和6例(12%)(p = 0.063),胃过速0例(0%)。胃(828 [460-3203]μV2 vs. 1526 [759-2958] μV2, p = 0.016)和小肠(49 [27-86]μV2 vs. 68 [37-130] μV2, p <0.001)。胃的功率比为1.6(0.9 ~ 2.5),小肠的功率比为1.4(1.0 ~ 2.5)。体重指数与胃和小肠在餐前和餐后的支配力呈负相关(r s = - 0.566, p <0.001;R s = - 0.534, p <0.001;R s = - 0.459, p <0.001;r s = - 0.529, p <分别为0.001)。布里斯托大便形态量表与小肠功率比呈正相关(r s = - 0.430, p = 0.002)。结论。胃和小肠的频率没有变化,但胃和小肠的功率显著增加。
Visualized Quantitative Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Activity in Healthy Volunteers Using a Noninvasive Single-Channel Electroamplifier
Background. Electrogastrography and electroenterography are noninvasive methods for measuring gastric and intestinal electrical activities, respectively. Few studies have measured electroenterography in healthy humans; however, no studies have measured electrogastrography and electroenterography simultaneously. This study was performed to provide basic electrogastrography and electroenterography data for comparison with future studies in patients. Methods. Simultaneous preprandial and postprandial measurements of electrogastrography and electroenterography were taken for 30 min each in 50 healthy volunteers. Power spectrum analysis was performed to calculate dominant frequency, dominant power, and power ratio. Results. Gastric and small intestinal dominant frequencies were not significantly different between preprandial and postprandial periods. In preprandial and postprandial periods, normogastria was seen in 49 (98%) and 44 (88%) patients ( ), bradygastria in 1 (2%) and 6 (12%) patients ( ), and tachygastria in 0 (0%) patients, respectively. Dominant power was significantly increased in the stomach (828 [460–3203] μV2 vs. 1526 [759–2958] μV2, ) and small intestine (49 [27–86] μV2 vs. 68 [37–130] μV2, ). The power ratio was 1.6 (0.9–2.5) in the stomach and 1.4 (1.0–2.5) in the small intestine. Body mass index showed a negative correlation with the stomach and small intestinal dominant power in preprandial and postprandial periods ( , ; , ; , ; and , , respectively). The Bristol Stool Form Scale correlated positively with the small intestinal power ratio ( , ). Conclusion. There was no change in frequency in the stomach or small intestine, but power significantly increased in both the stomach and small intestine.