真假转述语的言语线索检测

Edona Jahiu
{"title":"真假转述语的言语线索检测","authors":"Edona Jahiu","doi":"10.4236/jss.2023.119020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines pragma-linguistic cues and modal expressions of (un)true reported speech after confirmation of their veracity by the reporter in the end of conversations. From an inspection of 31 conversations between friends which contained RS, we seek to align discursive features according to truth-value of utterances. In addition, surrounding elements (shielding/evaluative parts) will be analyzed to show implications of RS according to speaker and his/her subjective assessment about reported statement. Article attempts to identify prominent verbal cues of true/false reports and their parts, according to pragmatic function. Respondents were instructed to be persuasive in both cases and use constructions they apply in real life when they’re (in)sincere while transmitting others’ statements. Findings show that true RS contain more uncertain epistemic modals on peripheral parts, don’t insist on compelling their evaluations to interlocutor, while personal assessment is main part on liar’s mind, because there is expressed his/her intent for lying.","PeriodicalId":74353,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of social sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting Verbal Cues of True and False Reported Speech\",\"authors\":\"Edona Jahiu\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jss.2023.119020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines pragma-linguistic cues and modal expressions of (un)true reported speech after confirmation of their veracity by the reporter in the end of conversations. From an inspection of 31 conversations between friends which contained RS, we seek to align discursive features according to truth-value of utterances. In addition, surrounding elements (shielding/evaluative parts) will be analyzed to show implications of RS according to speaker and his/her subjective assessment about reported statement. Article attempts to identify prominent verbal cues of true/false reports and their parts, according to pragmatic function. Respondents were instructed to be persuasive in both cases and use constructions they apply in real life when they’re (in)sincere while transmitting others’ statements. Findings show that true RS contain more uncertain epistemic modals on peripheral parts, don’t insist on compelling their evaluations to interlocutor, while personal assessment is main part on liar’s mind, because there is expressed his/her intent for lying.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open journal of social sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open journal of social sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.119020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.119020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在谈话结束时由报道者证实(非)真间接引语的真实性后,对其语用语言线索和情态表达进行了研究。通过对31个包含RS的朋友间对话的检查,我们试图根据话语的真值来调整话语特征。此外,将分析周围元素(屏蔽/评价部分),以根据说话者及其对报告陈述的主观评估显示RS的含义。本文试图根据语用功能,识别真实/虚假报道的主要言语线索及其组成部分。受访者被要求在这两种情况下都要有说服力,并使用他们在现实生活中使用的结构,当他们真诚地传递他人的陈述时。研究发现,真正的撒谎者在外围部分包含更多不确定的认知情态,不坚持将自己的评价强加给对话者,而在撒谎者的头脑中,个人评价是主要的部分,因为他/她表达了撒谎的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting Verbal Cues of True and False Reported Speech
This study examines pragma-linguistic cues and modal expressions of (un)true reported speech after confirmation of their veracity by the reporter in the end of conversations. From an inspection of 31 conversations between friends which contained RS, we seek to align discursive features according to truth-value of utterances. In addition, surrounding elements (shielding/evaluative parts) will be analyzed to show implications of RS according to speaker and his/her subjective assessment about reported statement. Article attempts to identify prominent verbal cues of true/false reports and their parts, according to pragmatic function. Respondents were instructed to be persuasive in both cases and use constructions they apply in real life when they’re (in)sincere while transmitting others’ statements. Findings show that true RS contain more uncertain epistemic modals on peripheral parts, don’t insist on compelling their evaluations to interlocutor, while personal assessment is main part on liar’s mind, because there is expressed his/her intent for lying.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信