根西岛皇家法院发现不诚实的失信行为:行为“en bon p re de famille”

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Sandie Lyne, Gareth Parr, Victoria Randall
{"title":"根西岛皇家法院发现不诚实的失信行为:行为“en bon p<e:1> re de famille”","authors":"Sandie Lyne, Gareth Parr, Victoria Randall","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In handing down its judgment in the matter of Nina Naustdal v TKC Corporate Services NV and two others on 23 December 2022, the Royal Court of Guernsey found that the First Defendant, a professional trustee, had acted in dishonest breach of trust. At the heart of the judgment was that the principal asset of the Trust had been transferred out of trust to benefit a stranger to the trust, constituting a fraud on a power. Amongst the various other relief that it granted, the Court declared that the purported transfer of trust property by the trustee was void. Furthermore, it ordered that the trustee be deprived of its indemnity for any legal fees and disbursements in connection with the proceedings and to repay any sums that had been taken from the trust.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guernsey Royal Court finds a dishonest breach of trust: acting ‘en bon père de famille’\",\"authors\":\"Sandie Lyne, Gareth Parr, Victoria Randall\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In handing down its judgment in the matter of Nina Naustdal v TKC Corporate Services NV and two others on 23 December 2022, the Royal Court of Guernsey found that the First Defendant, a professional trustee, had acted in dishonest breach of trust. At the heart of the judgment was that the principal asset of the Trust had been transferred out of trust to benefit a stranger to the trust, constituting a fraud on a power. Amongst the various other relief that it granted, the Court declared that the purported transfer of trust property by the trustee was void. Furthermore, it ordered that the trustee be deprived of its indemnity for any legal fees and disbursements in connection with the proceedings and to repay any sums that had been taken from the trust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根西岛皇家法院于2022年12月23日对Nina Naustdal诉TKC Corporate Services NV及其他两人一案作出判决,认为第一被告是一名专业受托人,其行为不诚实,违反了信托。该判决的核心是,该信托的主要资产已从信托中转移出去,以使该信托的一名陌生人受益,构成权力欺诈。在它授予的各种其他救济中,法院宣布受托人所谓的信托财产转让无效。此外,它还命令剥夺受托人对与诉讼有关的任何法律费用和付款的赔偿,并偿还从信托中扣除的任何款项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guernsey Royal Court finds a dishonest breach of trust: acting ‘en bon père de famille’
Abstract In handing down its judgment in the matter of Nina Naustdal v TKC Corporate Services NV and two others on 23 December 2022, the Royal Court of Guernsey found that the First Defendant, a professional trustee, had acted in dishonest breach of trust. At the heart of the judgment was that the principal asset of the Trust had been transferred out of trust to benefit a stranger to the trust, constituting a fraud on a power. Amongst the various other relief that it granted, the Court declared that the purported transfer of trust property by the trustee was void. Furthermore, it ordered that the trustee be deprived of its indemnity for any legal fees and disbursements in connection with the proceedings and to repay any sums that had been taken from the trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信