{"title":"历史变软:在好莱坞巴比伦表演丑闻的20世纪20年代","authors":"David Church","doi":"10.1080/23268743.2023.2225522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAdapted (without permission) from Kenneth Anger’s notorious book about early Hollywood scandals, the 1972 sexploitation version of Hollywood Babylon is a quasi-documentary that alternates between public-domain footage from silent-era films and softcore re-enactments of some of Anger’s most lurid anecdotes. The film’s generic reframing of his dubious stories as late-period sexploitation fodder participates in the book’s mission of desacralizing the stars, but its reticence to include unsimulated sex softens the punch of its scandalous subject matter, while inadvertently flaunting Anger’s fictionalization of history. This article argues that the performances in Hollywood Babylon doubly signal the ‘softness’ of both the filmmakers’ depictions of sex and Anger’s Hollywood lore, compounding the book’s thematic linkage of on-screen decadence, off-screen perversion, and movieland failures.KEYWORDS: Documentarysexploitationadaptationperformancere-enactmentscandal Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Here and in the following, references to the Hollywood Babylon pressbook and cover letter are from the private collection of Lisa Petrucci Vraney, who continues to make the film available via Something Weird Video. My supreme thanks to Lisa for making these documents available.2 Ironically, several of Anger’s own late-period films, including Green Hell (Anger, dir. Citation2007a) and I’ll Be Watching You (Anger, dir. Citation2007b), largely consist of pirated footage from gay porn videos.3 Additionally, Dietrich and Von Sternberg’s collaborative Hollywood period was the 1930s, rather than the 1920s, so this segment does not even fit the film’s purview.","PeriodicalId":37905,"journal":{"name":"Porn Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History gone soft: performing the scandalous 1920s in <i>Hollywood Babylon</i>\",\"authors\":\"David Church\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23268743.2023.2225522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAdapted (without permission) from Kenneth Anger’s notorious book about early Hollywood scandals, the 1972 sexploitation version of Hollywood Babylon is a quasi-documentary that alternates between public-domain footage from silent-era films and softcore re-enactments of some of Anger’s most lurid anecdotes. The film’s generic reframing of his dubious stories as late-period sexploitation fodder participates in the book’s mission of desacralizing the stars, but its reticence to include unsimulated sex softens the punch of its scandalous subject matter, while inadvertently flaunting Anger’s fictionalization of history. This article argues that the performances in Hollywood Babylon doubly signal the ‘softness’ of both the filmmakers’ depictions of sex and Anger’s Hollywood lore, compounding the book’s thematic linkage of on-screen decadence, off-screen perversion, and movieland failures.KEYWORDS: Documentarysexploitationadaptationperformancere-enactmentscandal Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Here and in the following, references to the Hollywood Babylon pressbook and cover letter are from the private collection of Lisa Petrucci Vraney, who continues to make the film available via Something Weird Video. My supreme thanks to Lisa for making these documents available.2 Ironically, several of Anger’s own late-period films, including Green Hell (Anger, dir. Citation2007a) and I’ll Be Watching You (Anger, dir. Citation2007b), largely consist of pirated footage from gay porn videos.3 Additionally, Dietrich and Von Sternberg’s collaborative Hollywood period was the 1930s, rather than the 1920s, so this segment does not even fit the film’s purview.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porn Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porn Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2023.2225522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porn Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2023.2225522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
History gone soft: performing the scandalous 1920s in Hollywood Babylon
ABSTRACTAdapted (without permission) from Kenneth Anger’s notorious book about early Hollywood scandals, the 1972 sexploitation version of Hollywood Babylon is a quasi-documentary that alternates between public-domain footage from silent-era films and softcore re-enactments of some of Anger’s most lurid anecdotes. The film’s generic reframing of his dubious stories as late-period sexploitation fodder participates in the book’s mission of desacralizing the stars, but its reticence to include unsimulated sex softens the punch of its scandalous subject matter, while inadvertently flaunting Anger’s fictionalization of history. This article argues that the performances in Hollywood Babylon doubly signal the ‘softness’ of both the filmmakers’ depictions of sex and Anger’s Hollywood lore, compounding the book’s thematic linkage of on-screen decadence, off-screen perversion, and movieland failures.KEYWORDS: Documentarysexploitationadaptationperformancere-enactmentscandal Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 Here and in the following, references to the Hollywood Babylon pressbook and cover letter are from the private collection of Lisa Petrucci Vraney, who continues to make the film available via Something Weird Video. My supreme thanks to Lisa for making these documents available.2 Ironically, several of Anger’s own late-period films, including Green Hell (Anger, dir. Citation2007a) and I’ll Be Watching You (Anger, dir. Citation2007b), largely consist of pirated footage from gay porn videos.3 Additionally, Dietrich and Von Sternberg’s collaborative Hollywood period was the 1930s, rather than the 1920s, so this segment does not even fit the film’s purview.
期刊介绍:
orn Studies is the first dedicated, international, peer-reviewed journal to critically explore those cultural products and services designated as pornographic and their cultural, economic, historical, institutional, legal and social contexts. Porn Studies will publish innovative work examining specifically sexual and explicit media forms, their connections to wider media landscapes and their links to the broader spheres of (sex) work across historical periods and national contexts. Porn Studies is an interdisciplinary journal informed by critical sexuality studies and work exploring the intersection of sexuality, gender, race, class, age and ability. It focuses on developing knowledge of pornographies past and present, in all their variations and around the world. Because pornography studies are still in their infancy we are also interested in discussions that focus on theoretical approaches, methodology and research ethics. Alongside articles, the journal includes a forum devoted to shorter observations, developments, debates or issues in porn studies, designed to encourage exchange and debate. Peer Review Policy: All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two anonymous referees.