Mindaugas Butkus, Laura Dargenyte-Kacileviciene, Kristina Matuzeviciute, Dovile Rupliene, Janina Seputiene
{"title":"劳动力市场调控对失业对经济增长敏感性的作用","authors":"Mindaugas Butkus, Laura Dargenyte-Kacileviciene, Kristina Matuzeviciute, Dovile Rupliene, Janina Seputiene","doi":"10.1007/s40822-023-00235-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Okun’s law suggests that economic growth and unemployment are negatively correlated–i.e., a 1% increase in GNP is associated with a decrease in the unemployment rate of 0.3 percentage points. However, agreement on the magnitude of this effect, the so-called Okun’s coefficient, is far from consistent. Empirical findings suggest that Okun’s coefficient varies for males and females, across educational attainment levels, between countries with different labor market regulations, and over recession and expansion periods. This paper is among the first attempts to jointly consider the abovementioned aspects of the heterogeneity of Okun’s law. Our empirical examinations are based on data from European Union countries over the 2000–2020 period. With quarterly data, we apply time-series regressions and estimate gender-, age- and educational attainment level-specific Okun’s coefficients for each country. In the second step, we run cross-country regressions to establish whether labor market regulations influence the responsiveness of unemployment to output growth. We use panel specifications and time-varying Okun’s coefficients to check robustness. Our results show that straightening labor market regulation would not significantly reduce the possibilities for growth to reduce unemployment.","PeriodicalId":45064,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Economic Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of labor market regulations on the sensitivity of unemployment to economic growth\",\"authors\":\"Mindaugas Butkus, Laura Dargenyte-Kacileviciene, Kristina Matuzeviciute, Dovile Rupliene, Janina Seputiene\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40822-023-00235-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Okun’s law suggests that economic growth and unemployment are negatively correlated–i.e., a 1% increase in GNP is associated with a decrease in the unemployment rate of 0.3 percentage points. However, agreement on the magnitude of this effect, the so-called Okun’s coefficient, is far from consistent. Empirical findings suggest that Okun’s coefficient varies for males and females, across educational attainment levels, between countries with different labor market regulations, and over recession and expansion periods. This paper is among the first attempts to jointly consider the abovementioned aspects of the heterogeneity of Okun’s law. Our empirical examinations are based on data from European Union countries over the 2000–2020 period. With quarterly data, we apply time-series regressions and estimate gender-, age- and educational attainment level-specific Okun’s coefficients for each country. In the second step, we run cross-country regressions to establish whether labor market regulations influence the responsiveness of unemployment to output growth. We use panel specifications and time-varying Okun’s coefficients to check robustness. Our results show that straightening labor market regulation would not significantly reduce the possibilities for growth to reduce unemployment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00235-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00235-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of labor market regulations on the sensitivity of unemployment to economic growth
Okun’s law suggests that economic growth and unemployment are negatively correlated–i.e., a 1% increase in GNP is associated with a decrease in the unemployment rate of 0.3 percentage points. However, agreement on the magnitude of this effect, the so-called Okun’s coefficient, is far from consistent. Empirical findings suggest that Okun’s coefficient varies for males and females, across educational attainment levels, between countries with different labor market regulations, and over recession and expansion periods. This paper is among the first attempts to jointly consider the abovementioned aspects of the heterogeneity of Okun’s law. Our empirical examinations are based on data from European Union countries over the 2000–2020 period. With quarterly data, we apply time-series regressions and estimate gender-, age- and educational attainment level-specific Okun’s coefficients for each country. In the second step, we run cross-country regressions to establish whether labor market regulations influence the responsiveness of unemployment to output growth. We use panel specifications and time-varying Okun’s coefficients to check robustness. Our results show that straightening labor market regulation would not significantly reduce the possibilities for growth to reduce unemployment.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Eurasian Economic Review is to publish peer-reviewed empirical research papers that test, extend, or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods - including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and any combination of methods - are welcome. Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all fields of finance and applied macroeconomics are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are highly encouraged. The journal has a broad scope, addressing such issues as: financial systems and regulation, corporate and start-up finance, macro and sustainable finance, finance and innovation, consumer finance, public policies on financial markets within local, regional, national and international contexts, money and banking, and the interface of labor and financial economics. The macroeconomics coverage includes topics from monetary economics, labor economics, international economics and development economics.
Eurasian Economic Review is published quarterly. To be published in Eurasian Economic Review, a manuscript must make strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to our field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice. Eurasian Economic Review is not tied to any national context. Although it focuses on Europe and Asia, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, cross-country or regional studies can be submitted.