“回到省牧师的管辖之下”:多明尼加修女和19世纪中西部天主教会女性代理的局限性

Elisabeth C. Davis
{"title":"“回到省牧师的管辖之下”:多明尼加修女和19世纪中西部天主教会女性代理的局限性","authors":"Elisabeth C. Davis","doi":"10.1353/ohh.2023.a912498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Back under the Jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial”The Dominican Sisters and the Limitations of Female Agency in the Nineteenth-Century Catholic Church in the Midwest Elisabeth C. Davis (bio) Introduction In 1864, Alexandre Jandel, the master general of the Order of St. Dominic (a Catholic religious order), wrote a letter to the Dominican Sisters of St. Catharine in Ohio and Kentucky informing them that they were no longer under the jurisdiction of the American leader of the Order of St. Dominic, the provincial,1 but were now under the authority of the local bishops, diocesan congregations.2 The Sisters responded, requesting to be placed “back under the jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial.”3 To them, becoming diocesan communities meant that they might lose their places within the international Dominican community; moreover, they feared that their position under Episcopal leadership would possibly limit their autonomy within the local dioceses and allow for various abuses of power by the diocesan clergy. Despite the feeling that Jandel’s proclamation had been abrupt, the question of who had authority over the Sisters had been an ongoing debate since their origins in antebellum America.4 Founded by American women, the Kentucky and Ohio Dominican Sisters [End Page 9] of St. Catharine faced an uncertain future from their inception. Within the first four decades of their existence, the clergy nearly disbanded the Sisters multiple times as these women struggled to find their place within the international and American communities. This article examines two such moments: the possible dissolution of the Sisters by Raphael Muños, a Dominican friar, and their placement under the diocesan clergy by Alexandre Jandel, the leader of the international order. The Sisters actively took part within these conflicts navigating the various lines of authority and power within the nineteenth-century American Catholic Church. While the topic of nineteenth-century Catholic sisters’ agency has been well explored, it has not fully included the history of the Dominican Sisters.5 Perhaps the most analytical study of the Sisters is Margaret Hogan’s dissertation, “Sister Servants: Catholic Women Religious in Antebellum Kentucky.” Hogan’s work places the Dominican Sisters in conversation with other women religious, particularly the Loretto and the Sisters of Charity. Through her comparison, Hogan’s dissertation identifies themes for the life of women religious in Kentucky.6 This article places these local politics within the order in the context of larger debates over jurisdiction and authority. It explores the boundaries of [End Page 10] female agency and action within the expanding Catholic Church. In doing so, it adds to the vibrant historiography on nineteenth-century women religious, both in the American Catholic Church and the American Midwest. Origins and Key Terms The organization of the Order of St. Dominic (the Dominicans) is key to understanding the position of the Dominican Sisters in nineteenth-century America; it must be noted that what follows is a summary of a complicated hierarchy and history. Women have been part of the Dominican order since the medieval period. They could be members of the Second Order (enclosed nuns) or the Third Order (laywomen).7 According to the Medieval Constitutions, “The Second are the enclosed Nuns who make solemn vows. The Third branch only make simple vows and do not observe enclosure. The Third was originally intended. . . . for maried [sic] and unmarried persons living at home.”8 No matter their designation, women participated within the Dominican missions of preaching and education. The distinction between the Second and Third Orders meant a difference in governance, authority, and jurisdiction. According to the original thirteenth-century constitutions, there was to be a balance between the local, regional, and international hierarchy.9 The Second Order was historically under the jurisdiction of the Dominican master general. These women were considered members of the Order of St. Dominic and had a level of protection from the local clergy. The Third Order typically consisted of localized lay congregations under the authority of the local bishops. These laywomen were associated with the Dominican order but held a marginal status and were technically not under [End Page 11] the jurisdiction of the master general, the leader of the international order.10 There were only certain situations...","PeriodicalId":82217,"journal":{"name":"Ohio history","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Back under the Jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial”: The Dominican Sisters and the Limitations of Female Agency in the Nineteenth-Century Catholic Church in the Midwest\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth C. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ohh.2023.a912498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Back under the Jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial”The Dominican Sisters and the Limitations of Female Agency in the Nineteenth-Century Catholic Church in the Midwest Elisabeth C. Davis (bio) Introduction In 1864, Alexandre Jandel, the master general of the Order of St. Dominic (a Catholic religious order), wrote a letter to the Dominican Sisters of St. Catharine in Ohio and Kentucky informing them that they were no longer under the jurisdiction of the American leader of the Order of St. Dominic, the provincial,1 but were now under the authority of the local bishops, diocesan congregations.2 The Sisters responded, requesting to be placed “back under the jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial.”3 To them, becoming diocesan communities meant that they might lose their places within the international Dominican community; moreover, they feared that their position under Episcopal leadership would possibly limit their autonomy within the local dioceses and allow for various abuses of power by the diocesan clergy. Despite the feeling that Jandel’s proclamation had been abrupt, the question of who had authority over the Sisters had been an ongoing debate since their origins in antebellum America.4 Founded by American women, the Kentucky and Ohio Dominican Sisters [End Page 9] of St. Catharine faced an uncertain future from their inception. Within the first four decades of their existence, the clergy nearly disbanded the Sisters multiple times as these women struggled to find their place within the international and American communities. This article examines two such moments: the possible dissolution of the Sisters by Raphael Muños, a Dominican friar, and their placement under the diocesan clergy by Alexandre Jandel, the leader of the international order. The Sisters actively took part within these conflicts navigating the various lines of authority and power within the nineteenth-century American Catholic Church. While the topic of nineteenth-century Catholic sisters’ agency has been well explored, it has not fully included the history of the Dominican Sisters.5 Perhaps the most analytical study of the Sisters is Margaret Hogan’s dissertation, “Sister Servants: Catholic Women Religious in Antebellum Kentucky.” Hogan’s work places the Dominican Sisters in conversation with other women religious, particularly the Loretto and the Sisters of Charity. Through her comparison, Hogan’s dissertation identifies themes for the life of women religious in Kentucky.6 This article places these local politics within the order in the context of larger debates over jurisdiction and authority. It explores the boundaries of [End Page 10] female agency and action within the expanding Catholic Church. In doing so, it adds to the vibrant historiography on nineteenth-century women religious, both in the American Catholic Church and the American Midwest. Origins and Key Terms The organization of the Order of St. Dominic (the Dominicans) is key to understanding the position of the Dominican Sisters in nineteenth-century America; it must be noted that what follows is a summary of a complicated hierarchy and history. Women have been part of the Dominican order since the medieval period. They could be members of the Second Order (enclosed nuns) or the Third Order (laywomen).7 According to the Medieval Constitutions, “The Second are the enclosed Nuns who make solemn vows. The Third branch only make simple vows and do not observe enclosure. The Third was originally intended. . . . for maried [sic] and unmarried persons living at home.”8 No matter their designation, women participated within the Dominican missions of preaching and education. The distinction between the Second and Third Orders meant a difference in governance, authority, and jurisdiction. According to the original thirteenth-century constitutions, there was to be a balance between the local, regional, and international hierarchy.9 The Second Order was historically under the jurisdiction of the Dominican master general. These women were considered members of the Order of St. Dominic and had a level of protection from the local clergy. The Third Order typically consisted of localized lay congregations under the authority of the local bishops. These laywomen were associated with the Dominican order but held a marginal status and were technically not under [End Page 11] the jurisdiction of the master general, the leader of the international order.10 There were only certain situations...\",\"PeriodicalId\":82217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio history\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ohh.2023.a912498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ohh.2023.a912498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《回到省牧师的管辖之下》《多明尼加修女与19世纪中西部天主教会女性能力的局限》伊丽莎白·c·戴维斯(传记)引言1864年,圣多明尼加骑士团(天主教骑士团)总会长亚历山大·詹德尔,他写了一封信给俄亥俄州和肯塔基州的圣凯瑟琳多明尼加修女会,告诉她们她们不再受省圣多明尼加骑士团美国领袖的管辖,而是受当地主教教区的管辖修女们回应说,要求将她们“重新置于省牧师的管辖之下”。“3对他们来说,成为教区团体意味着他们可能失去在国际多明尼加团体中的地位;此外,他们担心他们在圣公会领导下的地位可能会限制他们在当地教区内的自主权,并允许教区神职人员滥用各种权力。尽管人们觉得詹德尔的声明有些唐兀,但自修女会起源于南北战争前的美国以来,谁有权管理修女会的问题一直是一个持续不断的争论。圣凯瑟琳的肯塔基和俄亥俄多明尼加修女会由美国妇女创立,从一开始就面临着不确定的未来。在她们存在的头四十年里,神职人员几乎多次解散姐妹会,因为这些女性努力在国际和美国社区中找到自己的位置。本文考察了两个这样的时刻:多米尼加修士拉斐尔Muños可能解散修女会,以及国际秩序领袖亚历山大·詹德尔将修女会置于教区神职人员之下。修女们积极参与这些冲突,在19世纪美国天主教会的各种权威和权力中穿行。虽然19世纪天主教修女的代理这个话题已经被很好地探讨过,但它并没有完全包括多米尼加修女会的历史。也许对修女会最具分析性的研究是玛格丽特·霍根的论文,“姐妹仆人:战前肯塔基州的天主教妇女”。霍根的工作将多明尼加修女会与其他女性宗教人士,特别是洛雷托修女会和慈善修女会进行对话。通过她的比较,霍根的论文确定了肯塔基州妇女宗教生活的主题。6本文将这些地方政治置于关于管辖权和权威的更大辩论的背景下。它探索了在不断扩大的天主教会中女性能动性和行动的界限。在这样做的过程中,它增加了对19世纪美国天主教会和美国中西部妇女宗教的充满活力的历史编纂。圣道明会(The Order of St. Dominic)的组织是理解道明会在19世纪美国地位的关键;必须指出的是,下面是对一个复杂的等级制度和历史的总结。自中世纪以来,妇女一直是多米尼加教团的一员。她们可能是第二修会(封闭的修女)或第三修会(平信徒)的成员根据中世纪的宪法,“修女是封闭的修女,她们许下庄严的誓言。第三支只发简单的誓言,不守圈地。第三个最初是打算. . . .适用于已婚和未婚住在家里的人。“8不论她们的头衔是什么,妇女都参加了多明尼加传教和教育的任务。第二和第三秩序之间的区别意味着治理、权威和管辖权的不同。根据13世纪最初的宪法,地方、地区和国际等级制之间必须保持平衡第二骑士团在历史上是由多米尼加总会长管辖的。这些妇女被认为是圣多米尼克骑士团的成员,受到当地神职人员的一定程度的保护。第三阶通常由当地主教管辖下的本地教友组成。这些外行妇女与多明尼加骑士团有联系,但处于边缘地位,从技术上讲,她们不受国际骑士团领袖总会长的管辖只有在某些情况下……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Back under the Jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial”: The Dominican Sisters and the Limitations of Female Agency in the Nineteenth-Century Catholic Church in the Midwest
“Back under the Jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial”The Dominican Sisters and the Limitations of Female Agency in the Nineteenth-Century Catholic Church in the Midwest Elisabeth C. Davis (bio) Introduction In 1864, Alexandre Jandel, the master general of the Order of St. Dominic (a Catholic religious order), wrote a letter to the Dominican Sisters of St. Catharine in Ohio and Kentucky informing them that they were no longer under the jurisdiction of the American leader of the Order of St. Dominic, the provincial,1 but were now under the authority of the local bishops, diocesan congregations.2 The Sisters responded, requesting to be placed “back under the jurisdiction of the Rev. Provincial.”3 To them, becoming diocesan communities meant that they might lose their places within the international Dominican community; moreover, they feared that their position under Episcopal leadership would possibly limit their autonomy within the local dioceses and allow for various abuses of power by the diocesan clergy. Despite the feeling that Jandel’s proclamation had been abrupt, the question of who had authority over the Sisters had been an ongoing debate since their origins in antebellum America.4 Founded by American women, the Kentucky and Ohio Dominican Sisters [End Page 9] of St. Catharine faced an uncertain future from their inception. Within the first four decades of their existence, the clergy nearly disbanded the Sisters multiple times as these women struggled to find their place within the international and American communities. This article examines two such moments: the possible dissolution of the Sisters by Raphael Muños, a Dominican friar, and their placement under the diocesan clergy by Alexandre Jandel, the leader of the international order. The Sisters actively took part within these conflicts navigating the various lines of authority and power within the nineteenth-century American Catholic Church. While the topic of nineteenth-century Catholic sisters’ agency has been well explored, it has not fully included the history of the Dominican Sisters.5 Perhaps the most analytical study of the Sisters is Margaret Hogan’s dissertation, “Sister Servants: Catholic Women Religious in Antebellum Kentucky.” Hogan’s work places the Dominican Sisters in conversation with other women religious, particularly the Loretto and the Sisters of Charity. Through her comparison, Hogan’s dissertation identifies themes for the life of women religious in Kentucky.6 This article places these local politics within the order in the context of larger debates over jurisdiction and authority. It explores the boundaries of [End Page 10] female agency and action within the expanding Catholic Church. In doing so, it adds to the vibrant historiography on nineteenth-century women religious, both in the American Catholic Church and the American Midwest. Origins and Key Terms The organization of the Order of St. Dominic (the Dominicans) is key to understanding the position of the Dominican Sisters in nineteenth-century America; it must be noted that what follows is a summary of a complicated hierarchy and history. Women have been part of the Dominican order since the medieval period. They could be members of the Second Order (enclosed nuns) or the Third Order (laywomen).7 According to the Medieval Constitutions, “The Second are the enclosed Nuns who make solemn vows. The Third branch only make simple vows and do not observe enclosure. The Third was originally intended. . . . for maried [sic] and unmarried persons living at home.”8 No matter their designation, women participated within the Dominican missions of preaching and education. The distinction between the Second and Third Orders meant a difference in governance, authority, and jurisdiction. According to the original thirteenth-century constitutions, there was to be a balance between the local, regional, and international hierarchy.9 The Second Order was historically under the jurisdiction of the Dominican master general. These women were considered members of the Order of St. Dominic and had a level of protection from the local clergy. The Third Order typically consisted of localized lay congregations under the authority of the local bishops. These laywomen were associated with the Dominican order but held a marginal status and were technically not under [End Page 11] the jurisdiction of the master general, the leader of the international order.10 There were only certain situations...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信