俄罗斯联邦“伪造人”的方法和案件

Grigorii Sergeevich Mishugis-Beker
{"title":"俄罗斯联邦“伪造人”的方法和案件","authors":"Grigorii Sergeevich Mishugis-Beker","doi":"10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.39740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every year, the number of offenses related to \"forgery of a person\" in the Russian Federation is only growing, but there is no liability for fraud of this kind. The article discusses ways of seizing someone else's document with a socially dangerous illegal purpose. The arbitrary acquisition of a passport, as well as with temporary borrowing, is considered in detail as not explicitly related to illegal acts. An attempt is made to answer the question of whether the passport is property. cases of the use of other people's documents or personal data with a socially dangerous illegal purpose are also considered. The author draws attention to the fact that the number of different types of cases of \"forgery of a person\" is much more than was presented. These types need to be analyzed in detail in further studies from the point of view of violation of inalienable rights, and especially the right to a name. These issues are investigated using logical and systematic methods, analysis and synthesis, formal legal, comparative legal methods of cognition. The main conclusion of the study is the position on the need to expand the disposition of Part 3 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation by fixing the possibility of criminal prosecution for using someone else's document or personal data for a socially dangerous illegal purpose.","PeriodicalId":476022,"journal":{"name":"Policejskaâ i sledstvennaâ deâtelʹnostʹ","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods and cases of \\\"forgery of a person\\\" in the Russian Federation\",\"authors\":\"Grigorii Sergeevich Mishugis-Beker\",\"doi\":\"10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.39740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every year, the number of offenses related to \\\"forgery of a person\\\" in the Russian Federation is only growing, but there is no liability for fraud of this kind. The article discusses ways of seizing someone else's document with a socially dangerous illegal purpose. The arbitrary acquisition of a passport, as well as with temporary borrowing, is considered in detail as not explicitly related to illegal acts. An attempt is made to answer the question of whether the passport is property. cases of the use of other people's documents or personal data with a socially dangerous illegal purpose are also considered. The author draws attention to the fact that the number of different types of cases of \\\"forgery of a person\\\" is much more than was presented. These types need to be analyzed in detail in further studies from the point of view of violation of inalienable rights, and especially the right to a name. These issues are investigated using logical and systematic methods, analysis and synthesis, formal legal, comparative legal methods of cognition. The main conclusion of the study is the position on the need to expand the disposition of Part 3 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation by fixing the possibility of criminal prosecution for using someone else's document or personal data for a socially dangerous illegal purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":476022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policejskaâ i sledstvennaâ deâtelʹnostʹ\",\"volume\":\"201 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policejskaâ i sledstvennaâ deâtelʹnostʹ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.39740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policejskaâ i sledstvennaâ deâtelʹnostʹ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7810.2023.3.39740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在俄罗斯联邦,与“伪造人”有关的罪行每年都在增加,但对这类欺诈不承担任何责任。本文讨论了具有社会危害性的非法目的扣押他人文件的方法。任意取得护照以及临时借用护照的情况被详细地认为与非法行为没有明确的关系。试图回答护照是否是财产的问题。将他人的文件或个人资料用于具有社会危险性的非法目的的情况也会考虑在内。作者提请注意,不同类型的“伪造人”案件的数量远远超过所提出的事实。这些类型需要在进一步的研究中从侵犯不可剥夺权利,特别是侵犯姓名权的角度进行详细的分析。运用逻辑和系统的方法、分析和综合的方法、形式法学的方法、比较法学的认识方法对这些问题进行了研究。研究报告的主要结论是关于有必要扩大《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第327条第3部分的处分范围的立场,确定利用他人的文件或个人资料用于具有社会危险性的非法目的的刑事起诉的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods and cases of "forgery of a person" in the Russian Federation
Every year, the number of offenses related to "forgery of a person" in the Russian Federation is only growing, but there is no liability for fraud of this kind. The article discusses ways of seizing someone else's document with a socially dangerous illegal purpose. The arbitrary acquisition of a passport, as well as with temporary borrowing, is considered in detail as not explicitly related to illegal acts. An attempt is made to answer the question of whether the passport is property. cases of the use of other people's documents or personal data with a socially dangerous illegal purpose are also considered. The author draws attention to the fact that the number of different types of cases of "forgery of a person" is much more than was presented. These types need to be analyzed in detail in further studies from the point of view of violation of inalienable rights, and especially the right to a name. These issues are investigated using logical and systematic methods, analysis and synthesis, formal legal, comparative legal methods of cognition. The main conclusion of the study is the position on the need to expand the disposition of Part 3 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation by fixing the possibility of criminal prosecution for using someone else's document or personal data for a socially dangerous illegal purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信