《活的酷儿历史:南方城市的记忆与归属》格雷戈里·萨曼莎·罗森塔尔著

Greta Rensenbrink
{"title":"《活的酷儿历史:南方城市的记忆与归属》格雷戈里·萨曼莎·罗森塔尔著","authors":"Greta Rensenbrink","doi":"10.1353/wvh.2023.a906884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal Greta Rensenbrink Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City. By Gregory Samantha Rosenthal. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2021. Pp. 229.) As G. Samantha Rosenthal notes, “This is not so much a history book as a book about history” (10). While the reader can piece together a narrative of the layered queer pasts of Roanoke, Virginia, the book’s focus is on the project of collecting and honoring queer pasts, and the significance and meaningfulness of that history in creating space for queer futures. The book examines the work of the Southwest Virginia LGBTQ+ History Project, an organization Rosenthal helped to lead. The text can be read as a manifesto for the importance of queer public history and public space in a rapidly digitizing world, as a primer for how to do (and not do) queer public history, and as a personal memoir. The latter is a strength and a potential weakness of the book. The author’s rigorous interrogation of their experience as a white trans woman transplanted to Appalachia, viewed through their understanding of intersubjectivity, is strikingly revealing, but the personal narrative can sometimes be distracting. The book is well grounded in LGBTQ+ historiography and in theoretical approaches to space, place and identity, and its archival and oral history research, the heart of the project, is impressive. The book opens with a history of Roanoke as a “Sin City” (19) that created spaces for queer people, most visibly white gay men, queens, and trans women. The early history especially is more suggestive than evidenced, but the author does an excellent job situating the story within larger historical frames. The second chapter explores the creation and development of the project, focusing on the problems it faced and how it sought to overcome them. This is followed by three thematic chapters, which contain some of the narrative missing from that first historical overview. The first explores the history of lesbianism, and the second transgender history. Both raise a critical question for queer public history: how do public history projects contend with [End Page 123] generational differences in language, experience, and identity? In the first, the author examines the problem of creating a history of an identity that most of the young women who worked with the project did not themselves claim. It raises more questions than it has answers, but the trans chapter is more satisfying. Rosenthal does a fabulously nuanced job of thinking through the many meanings of trans across generations and within communities, showing how sensitivity to those differences can lead to a richer history and more meaningful community connections in the present. The next chapter addresses the ways race and racism have shaped Roanoke’s queer history, the (mostly white) project itself, and the possibilities and realities of Black queer history. The lessons here are directed more to white historians and volunteers in how to respect and honor Black people and history, but also contain important stories about the history of Black queerness and its connections, both problematic and joyful, to the city’s sexual marketplaces. The voices of Black queens and trans women are showcased here. The final chapter considers the changes in queer public history in the digital age and reads as an impassioned plea for the importance of materiality and physical space in maintaining and growing vibrant queer communities. This is a terrific book for anyone interested in public history projects, queer Appalachia, or the importance of space and place in public memory. Its optimistic view, the energized voice of the author, and its blunt honesty make for engaging and inspiring reading. [End Page 124] Greta Rensenbrink Marshall University Copyright © 2023 West Virginia University Press","PeriodicalId":350051,"journal":{"name":"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal (review)\",\"authors\":\"Greta Rensenbrink\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wvh.2023.a906884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal Greta Rensenbrink Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City. By Gregory Samantha Rosenthal. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2021. Pp. 229.) As G. Samantha Rosenthal notes, “This is not so much a history book as a book about history” (10). While the reader can piece together a narrative of the layered queer pasts of Roanoke, Virginia, the book’s focus is on the project of collecting and honoring queer pasts, and the significance and meaningfulness of that history in creating space for queer futures. The book examines the work of the Southwest Virginia LGBTQ+ History Project, an organization Rosenthal helped to lead. The text can be read as a manifesto for the importance of queer public history and public space in a rapidly digitizing world, as a primer for how to do (and not do) queer public history, and as a personal memoir. The latter is a strength and a potential weakness of the book. The author’s rigorous interrogation of their experience as a white trans woman transplanted to Appalachia, viewed through their understanding of intersubjectivity, is strikingly revealing, but the personal narrative can sometimes be distracting. The book is well grounded in LGBTQ+ historiography and in theoretical approaches to space, place and identity, and its archival and oral history research, the heart of the project, is impressive. The book opens with a history of Roanoke as a “Sin City” (19) that created spaces for queer people, most visibly white gay men, queens, and trans women. The early history especially is more suggestive than evidenced, but the author does an excellent job situating the story within larger historical frames. The second chapter explores the creation and development of the project, focusing on the problems it faced and how it sought to overcome them. This is followed by three thematic chapters, which contain some of the narrative missing from that first historical overview. The first explores the history of lesbianism, and the second transgender history. Both raise a critical question for queer public history: how do public history projects contend with [End Page 123] generational differences in language, experience, and identity? In the first, the author examines the problem of creating a history of an identity that most of the young women who worked with the project did not themselves claim. It raises more questions than it has answers, but the trans chapter is more satisfying. Rosenthal does a fabulously nuanced job of thinking through the many meanings of trans across generations and within communities, showing how sensitivity to those differences can lead to a richer history and more meaningful community connections in the present. The next chapter addresses the ways race and racism have shaped Roanoke’s queer history, the (mostly white) project itself, and the possibilities and realities of Black queer history. The lessons here are directed more to white historians and volunteers in how to respect and honor Black people and history, but also contain important stories about the history of Black queerness and its connections, both problematic and joyful, to the city’s sexual marketplaces. The voices of Black queens and trans women are showcased here. The final chapter considers the changes in queer public history in the digital age and reads as an impassioned plea for the importance of materiality and physical space in maintaining and growing vibrant queer communities. This is a terrific book for anyone interested in public history projects, queer Appalachia, or the importance of space and place in public memory. Its optimistic view, the energized voice of the author, and its blunt honesty make for engaging and inspiring reading. [End Page 124] Greta Rensenbrink Marshall University Copyright © 2023 West Virginia University Press\",\"PeriodicalId\":350051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wvh.2023.a906884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wvh.2023.a906884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者:格里高利·萨曼莎·罗森塔尔·格里塔·伦森布林克《活的酷儿历史:南方城市的记忆与归属》格雷戈里·萨曼莎·罗森塔尔著。(教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2021年。229页。)正如g·萨曼莎·罗森塔尔所说:“与其说这是一本历史书,不如说是一本关于历史的书。”虽然读者可以拼凑出弗吉尼亚州罗阿诺克的酷儿过去的故事,但这本书的重点是收集和纪念酷儿的过去,以及这段历史在为酷儿的未来创造空间方面的重要性和意义。这本书考察了罗森塔尔帮助领导的西南弗吉尼亚LGBTQ+历史项目的工作。这篇文章可以被解读为酷儿公共历史和公共空间在一个快速数字化的世界中的重要性的宣言,作为如何做(和不做)酷儿公共历史的入门读物,以及作为个人回忆录。后者是本书的优点,也是潜在的缺点。作者通过她们对主体间性的理解,对她们作为白人跨性别女性移植到阿巴拉契亚的经历进行了严格的拷问,这令人印象深刻,但这种个人叙事有时会让人分心。这本书以LGBTQ+的史学和空间、地点和身份的理论方法为基础,其档案和口述历史研究(该项目的核心)令人印象深刻。这本书开篇讲述了罗阿诺克作为一个“罪恶之城”的历史(19),它为同性恋者创造了空间,最明显的是白人同性恋者、女王和变性女性。尤其是早期的历史,更多的是暗示而不是证据,但作者在将故事置于更大的历史框架中做得很好。第二章探讨了这个项目的创建和发展,重点是它面临的问题以及它是如何克服这些问题的。接下来是三个主题章节,其中包含了第一个历史概述中缺少的一些叙述。第一部探讨了女同性恋的历史,第二部探讨了变性人的历史。两者都为酷儿公共历史提出了一个关键问题:公共历史项目如何应对语言、经历和身份上的代际差异?在第一部分中,作者探讨了创造一种身份的历史的问题,而大多数参与该项目的年轻女性自己并没有声称自己的身份。它提出的问题多于答案,但跨章更令人满意。罗森塔尔细致入微地思考了跨代和社区内跨性别的许多含义,展示了对这些差异的敏感性如何能在当前带来更丰富的历史和更有意义的社区联系。下一章讲述了种族和种族主义如何塑造了罗阿诺克的酷儿历史,(主要是白人)项目本身,以及黑人酷儿历史的可能性和现实。这里的课程更多是针对白人历史学家和志愿者,教他们如何尊重和尊重黑人和历史,但也包含了关于黑人酷儿历史的重要故事,以及它与城市性市场的联系,既有问题,也有快乐。这里展示了黑人女王和变性女性的声音。最后一章考虑了数字时代酷儿公共历史的变化,并将其视为对物质和物理空间在维持和发展充满活力的酷儿社区中的重要性的一种慷慨激昂的请求。对于任何对公共历史项目、奇怪的阿巴拉契亚或空间和地点在公共记忆中的重要性感兴趣的人来说,这是一本极好的书。它乐观的观点,作者充满活力的声音,以及直率的诚实,使其成为引人入胜和鼓舞人心的读物。[End Page 124]马歇尔大学版权©2023西弗吉尼亚大学出版社
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal (review)
Reviewed by: Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal Greta Rensenbrink Living Queer History: Remembrance and Belonging in a Southern City. By Gregory Samantha Rosenthal. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2021. Pp. 229.) As G. Samantha Rosenthal notes, “This is not so much a history book as a book about history” (10). While the reader can piece together a narrative of the layered queer pasts of Roanoke, Virginia, the book’s focus is on the project of collecting and honoring queer pasts, and the significance and meaningfulness of that history in creating space for queer futures. The book examines the work of the Southwest Virginia LGBTQ+ History Project, an organization Rosenthal helped to lead. The text can be read as a manifesto for the importance of queer public history and public space in a rapidly digitizing world, as a primer for how to do (and not do) queer public history, and as a personal memoir. The latter is a strength and a potential weakness of the book. The author’s rigorous interrogation of their experience as a white trans woman transplanted to Appalachia, viewed through their understanding of intersubjectivity, is strikingly revealing, but the personal narrative can sometimes be distracting. The book is well grounded in LGBTQ+ historiography and in theoretical approaches to space, place and identity, and its archival and oral history research, the heart of the project, is impressive. The book opens with a history of Roanoke as a “Sin City” (19) that created spaces for queer people, most visibly white gay men, queens, and trans women. The early history especially is more suggestive than evidenced, but the author does an excellent job situating the story within larger historical frames. The second chapter explores the creation and development of the project, focusing on the problems it faced and how it sought to overcome them. This is followed by three thematic chapters, which contain some of the narrative missing from that first historical overview. The first explores the history of lesbianism, and the second transgender history. Both raise a critical question for queer public history: how do public history projects contend with [End Page 123] generational differences in language, experience, and identity? In the first, the author examines the problem of creating a history of an identity that most of the young women who worked with the project did not themselves claim. It raises more questions than it has answers, but the trans chapter is more satisfying. Rosenthal does a fabulously nuanced job of thinking through the many meanings of trans across generations and within communities, showing how sensitivity to those differences can lead to a richer history and more meaningful community connections in the present. The next chapter addresses the ways race and racism have shaped Roanoke’s queer history, the (mostly white) project itself, and the possibilities and realities of Black queer history. The lessons here are directed more to white historians and volunteers in how to respect and honor Black people and history, but also contain important stories about the history of Black queerness and its connections, both problematic and joyful, to the city’s sexual marketplaces. The voices of Black queens and trans women are showcased here. The final chapter considers the changes in queer public history in the digital age and reads as an impassioned plea for the importance of materiality and physical space in maintaining and growing vibrant queer communities. This is a terrific book for anyone interested in public history projects, queer Appalachia, or the importance of space and place in public memory. Its optimistic view, the energized voice of the author, and its blunt honesty make for engaging and inspiring reading. [End Page 124] Greta Rensenbrink Marshall University Copyright © 2023 West Virginia University Press
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信