《音乐很重要:音乐教育哲学》作者:大卫·艾略特、玛丽莎·西尔弗曼

IF 0.7 0 MUSIC
Renato Cardoso
{"title":"《音乐很重要:音乐教育哲学》作者:大卫·艾略特、玛丽莎·西尔弗曼","authors":"Renato Cardoso","doi":"10.2979/pme.2023.a885193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, I present a five-part critique of the main aspects of the second edition of Music Matters by David Elliott and Marissa Silverman. This edition further develops their praxial philosophy, comprising topics on the nature and value of music education from a normative perspective, which in turn is developed to suit all musical education contexts. My analysis is organized in five main arguments concerning, first, an absence of historicity; second, the adoption of universalist premises; third, the inconsistency between the concepts of personhood and musical value; fourth, the adoption of a normative philosophy; and fifth, the relation between synthesis and content in the chapters. I argue that the book is constructed from a universalistic perspective and that its premises have epistemological inconsistencies. I offer a critical analysis of this extensive work for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue about themes which are relevant to the further development of philosophical thought in music education.","PeriodicalId":43479,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music Matters: A Philosophy of Music Education by David Elliott and Marissa Silverman (review)\",\"authors\":\"Renato Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/pme.2023.a885193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In this article, I present a five-part critique of the main aspects of the second edition of Music Matters by David Elliott and Marissa Silverman. This edition further develops their praxial philosophy, comprising topics on the nature and value of music education from a normative perspective, which in turn is developed to suit all musical education contexts. My analysis is organized in five main arguments concerning, first, an absence of historicity; second, the adoption of universalist premises; third, the inconsistency between the concepts of personhood and musical value; fourth, the adoption of a normative philosophy; and fifth, the relation between synthesis and content in the chapters. I argue that the book is constructed from a universalistic perspective and that its premises have epistemological inconsistencies. I offer a critical analysis of this extensive work for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue about themes which are relevant to the further development of philosophical thought in music education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy of Music Education Review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy of Music Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/pme.2023.a885193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/pme.2023.a885193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在本文中,我对大卫·艾略特和玛丽莎·西尔弗曼的第二版《音乐重要》的主要方面进行了五部分的评论。这个版本进一步发展了他们的实践哲学,包括从规范的角度对音乐教育的性质和价值的主题,这反过来又发展到适合所有的音乐教育背景。我的分析分为五个主要论点,第一,缺乏历史性;第二,普遍前提的采用;三是人格观念与音乐价值观念的不一致;第四,采用规范哲学;第五,各章综合与内容的关系。我认为这本书是从普遍主义的角度构建的,它的前提在认识论上是不一致的。我对这项广泛的工作进行了批判性的分析,目的是就与音乐教育中哲学思想的进一步发展有关的主题进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Music Matters: A Philosophy of Music Education by David Elliott and Marissa Silverman (review)
Abstract:In this article, I present a five-part critique of the main aspects of the second edition of Music Matters by David Elliott and Marissa Silverman. This edition further develops their praxial philosophy, comprising topics on the nature and value of music education from a normative perspective, which in turn is developed to suit all musical education contexts. My analysis is organized in five main arguments concerning, first, an absence of historicity; second, the adoption of universalist premises; third, the inconsistency between the concepts of personhood and musical value; fourth, the adoption of a normative philosophy; and fifth, the relation between synthesis and content in the chapters. I argue that the book is constructed from a universalistic perspective and that its premises have epistemological inconsistencies. I offer a critical analysis of this extensive work for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue about themes which are relevant to the further development of philosophical thought in music education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信