芬兰义务学校英语和瑞典教师课堂评估实践

Marita Härmälä
{"title":"芬兰义务学校英语和瑞典教师课堂评估实践","authors":"Marita Härmälä","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study explores Finnish compulsory school language teachers’ formative and summative assessment practices. It aims at finding out what formative and summative assessment modes and tools the teachers use and what kind of evidence they collect for students’ final grades. The data were gathered through questionnaires administered in national evaluations of learning outcomes. The results indicate that teachers use multiple tools, i.e., scores, information on a task’s objective, oral feedback, and model performances. They listen to students paired discussions and talk with students about their progress. Students also assess their own skills. Teachers’ feedback on exams was information on a task’s objective, oral feedback, and model performances. When deciding on final grades, teachers use as evidence written tests and students’ working in lessons. However, there were some differences between languages and syllabi. Teachers gave the final grades based on students’ language proficiency at a given moment stressing the curricula’s content areas related to language proficiency. At the same time, teachers indicated to be basing their grades on averages in all the different content areas. The study has implications for teachers’ assessment literary training and for exploring more in detail the factors impacting students’ final grades.","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finnish Compulsory School English and Swedish Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Practices\",\"authors\":\"Marita Härmälä\",\"doi\":\"10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study explores Finnish compulsory school language teachers’ formative and summative assessment practices. It aims at finding out what formative and summative assessment modes and tools the teachers use and what kind of evidence they collect for students’ final grades. The data were gathered through questionnaires administered in national evaluations of learning outcomes. The results indicate that teachers use multiple tools, i.e., scores, information on a task’s objective, oral feedback, and model performances. They listen to students paired discussions and talk with students about their progress. Students also assess their own skills. Teachers’ feedback on exams was information on a task’s objective, oral feedback, and model performances. When deciding on final grades, teachers use as evidence written tests and students’ working in lessons. However, there were some differences between languages and syllabi. Teachers gave the final grades based on students’ language proficiency at a given moment stressing the curricula’s content areas related to language proficiency. At the same time, teachers indicated to be basing their grades on averages in all the different content areas. The study has implications for teachers’ assessment literary training and for exploring more in detail the factors impacting students’ final grades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Teaching Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Teaching Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了芬兰义务教育语言教师的形成性和总结性评价实践。它旨在找出教师使用的形成性和总结性评估模式和工具,以及他们为学生的最终成绩收集了什么样的证据。这些数据是通过在国家学习成果评估中进行的问卷调查收集的。结果表明,教师使用多种工具,即分数、任务目标信息、口头反馈和模型表现。他们听学生的结对讨论,并与学生谈论他们的进步。学生们还要评估自己的技能。教师对考试的反馈是关于任务目标、口头反馈和示范表现的信息。在决定最终成绩时,教师将笔试和学生在课堂上的表现作为证据。然而,语言和教学大纲之间存在一些差异。教师根据学生在特定时刻的语言能力给出最终分数,强调课程中与语言能力相关的内容领域。与此同时,教师们表示,他们的成绩是基于所有不同内容领域的平均成绩。本研究对教师评价文学训练及更详细地探讨影响学生最终成绩的因素具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finnish Compulsory School English and Swedish Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Practices
The study explores Finnish compulsory school language teachers’ formative and summative assessment practices. It aims at finding out what formative and summative assessment modes and tools the teachers use and what kind of evidence they collect for students’ final grades. The data were gathered through questionnaires administered in national evaluations of learning outcomes. The results indicate that teachers use multiple tools, i.e., scores, information on a task’s objective, oral feedback, and model performances. They listen to students paired discussions and talk with students about their progress. Students also assess their own skills. Teachers’ feedback on exams was information on a task’s objective, oral feedback, and model performances. When deciding on final grades, teachers use as evidence written tests and students’ working in lessons. However, there were some differences between languages and syllabi. Teachers gave the final grades based on students’ language proficiency at a given moment stressing the curricula’s content areas related to language proficiency. At the same time, teachers indicated to be basing their grades on averages in all the different content areas. The study has implications for teachers’ assessment literary training and for exploring more in detail the factors impacting students’ final grades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信