L. Mendoza, C. Avila, R. Rodríguez, L. Loaiza, G. Roque
{"title":"乳房钙化x射线成像中半导体材料的CNR性能","authors":"L. Mendoza, C. Avila, R. Rodríguez, L. Loaiza, G. Roque","doi":"10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/t11001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We present the results of a GAMOS/GEANT4 computer simulation of a standard X-ray mammography system, which consists of a Tungsten 28 kVp polychromatic X-ray source with a 50 μm Rh filter, a mammography phantom with Al 2 O 3 spherical specks of different diameters, and a generic pixel detector (55 μm × 55 μm pixel size) with different types of semiconductor sensors. The number of photons simulated is calibrated to produce similar entrance surface dose (ESD) as the one used by a standard clinical mammography screening. Estimates of Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) as a function of ESD, sensor thickness and microcalcification diameter are presented for four different sensor materials: Silicon (Si), Cadmium Telluride (CdTe), Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) and Perovskite (MAPbI3). For the X-ray energy spectrum and pixel size considered, and an ESD dose of 4 mGy, our study shows that, with the exception of Si, these sensors, as thin as 200 μm, are able to resolve (with at least 3 standard deviations above background) Al 2 O 3 spherical specks up to a minimum diameter of 180 μm, having statistically compatible CNR performance. The increase in substrate thickness has a substantial improvement in the CNR values provided by the Si sensor, while for the other cases the enhancement of CNR is marginal and consistent with statistical uncertainties with the thinnest case considered.","PeriodicalId":16184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Instrumentation","volume":"34 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CNR performance of semiconductor materials for X-ray imaging of breast calcifications\",\"authors\":\"L. Mendoza, C. Avila, R. Rodríguez, L. Loaiza, G. Roque\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/t11001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We present the results of a GAMOS/GEANT4 computer simulation of a standard X-ray mammography system, which consists of a Tungsten 28 kVp polychromatic X-ray source with a 50 μm Rh filter, a mammography phantom with Al 2 O 3 spherical specks of different diameters, and a generic pixel detector (55 μm × 55 μm pixel size) with different types of semiconductor sensors. The number of photons simulated is calibrated to produce similar entrance surface dose (ESD) as the one used by a standard clinical mammography screening. Estimates of Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) as a function of ESD, sensor thickness and microcalcification diameter are presented for four different sensor materials: Silicon (Si), Cadmium Telluride (CdTe), Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) and Perovskite (MAPbI3). For the X-ray energy spectrum and pixel size considered, and an ESD dose of 4 mGy, our study shows that, with the exception of Si, these sensors, as thin as 200 μm, are able to resolve (with at least 3 standard deviations above background) Al 2 O 3 spherical specks up to a minimum diameter of 180 μm, having statistically compatible CNR performance. The increase in substrate thickness has a substantial improvement in the CNR values provided by the Si sensor, while for the other cases the enhancement of CNR is marginal and consistent with statistical uncertainties with the thinnest case considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Instrumentation\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Instrumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/t11001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/t11001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
CNR performance of semiconductor materials for X-ray imaging of breast calcifications
Abstract We present the results of a GAMOS/GEANT4 computer simulation of a standard X-ray mammography system, which consists of a Tungsten 28 kVp polychromatic X-ray source with a 50 μm Rh filter, a mammography phantom with Al 2 O 3 spherical specks of different diameters, and a generic pixel detector (55 μm × 55 μm pixel size) with different types of semiconductor sensors. The number of photons simulated is calibrated to produce similar entrance surface dose (ESD) as the one used by a standard clinical mammography screening. Estimates of Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) as a function of ESD, sensor thickness and microcalcification diameter are presented for four different sensor materials: Silicon (Si), Cadmium Telluride (CdTe), Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) and Perovskite (MAPbI3). For the X-ray energy spectrum and pixel size considered, and an ESD dose of 4 mGy, our study shows that, with the exception of Si, these sensors, as thin as 200 μm, are able to resolve (with at least 3 standard deviations above background) Al 2 O 3 spherical specks up to a minimum diameter of 180 μm, having statistically compatible CNR performance. The increase in substrate thickness has a substantial improvement in the CNR values provided by the Si sensor, while for the other cases the enhancement of CNR is marginal and consistent with statistical uncertainties with the thinnest case considered.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Instrumentation (JINST) covers major areas related to concepts and instrumentation in detector physics, accelerator science and associated experimental methods and techniques, theory, modelling and simulations. The main subject areas include.
-Accelerators: concepts, modelling, simulations and sources-
Instrumentation and hardware for accelerators: particles, synchrotron radiation, neutrons-
Detector physics: concepts, processes, methods, modelling and simulations-
Detectors, apparatus and methods for particle, astroparticle, nuclear, atomic, and molecular physics-
Instrumentation and methods for plasma research-
Methods and apparatus for astronomy and astrophysics-
Detectors, methods and apparatus for biomedical applications, life sciences and material research-
Instrumentation and techniques for medical imaging, diagnostics and therapy-
Instrumentation and techniques for dosimetry, monitoring and radiation damage-
Detectors, instrumentation and methods for non-destructive tests (NDT)-
Detector readout concepts, electronics and data acquisition methods-
Algorithms, software and data reduction methods-
Materials and associated technologies, etc.-
Engineering and technical issues.
JINST also includes a section dedicated to technical reports and instrumentation theses.