{"title":"驾驭管辖权扩张:ICSID在加强外国投资保护方面的作用分析","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), affiliated with 165 member countries, holds exclusive jurisdiction over state-foreign investor disputes. ICSID arbitral tribunals frequently expand their jurisdiction and amplify protection for foreign investments through broad interpretation of jurisdictional conditions, enlarged application of the Most-Favored-Nation and Umbrella Clauses, and adaptability of the Fork-in-the-Road provision. This paper scrutinizes these strategies and underscores the tribunals' role in shaping investment protection while considering their impact on the delicate balance between international arbitration and local remedies. It concludes by advocating for a more balanced approach that respects local remedies while safeguarding foreign investment interests.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Jurisdictional Expansion: An Analysis of ICSID's Role in Bolstering Foreign Investment Protection\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.23977/law.2023.020701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), affiliated with 165 member countries, holds exclusive jurisdiction over state-foreign investor disputes. ICSID arbitral tribunals frequently expand their jurisdiction and amplify protection for foreign investments through broad interpretation of jurisdictional conditions, enlarged application of the Most-Favored-Nation and Umbrella Clauses, and adaptability of the Fork-in-the-Road provision. This paper scrutinizes these strategies and underscores the tribunals' role in shaping investment protection while considering their impact on the delicate balance between international arbitration and local remedies. It concludes by advocating for a more balanced approach that respects local remedies while safeguarding foreign investment interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating Jurisdictional Expansion: An Analysis of ICSID's Role in Bolstering Foreign Investment Protection
Under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), affiliated with 165 member countries, holds exclusive jurisdiction over state-foreign investor disputes. ICSID arbitral tribunals frequently expand their jurisdiction and amplify protection for foreign investments through broad interpretation of jurisdictional conditions, enlarged application of the Most-Favored-Nation and Umbrella Clauses, and adaptability of the Fork-in-the-Road provision. This paper scrutinizes these strategies and underscores the tribunals' role in shaping investment protection while considering their impact on the delicate balance between international arbitration and local remedies. It concludes by advocating for a more balanced approach that respects local remedies while safeguarding foreign investment interests.