基层人民法院刑事和解的实践与完善

{"title":"基层人民法院刑事和解的实践与完善","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The People's Court of District S has been actively exploring the mechanism of criminal reconciliation in public prosecution cases since early 2010, and in the past three years, criminal reconciliation cases have achieved certain legal and social effects, but also revealed some shortcomings and shortcomings in the application of procedures. However, this legislation is unable to meet the realistic needs of criminal judicial practice, especially the grassroots criminal judicial practice, and there are problems of application, mode and limit, etc. In future judicial practice, it is necessary to enhance the operability of the initiation of the procedure, improve the standardization of the conduct of the procedure, increase the possibility of equal application, and establish supporting mechanisms to guarantee the function of reconciliation In future judicial practice, there is a need to enhance the operation of the procedure, improve the regulation of the procedure, enhance the possibility of equal application, and establish supporting mechanisms to guarantee the full play of the function of reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Practice and Improvement of Criminal Reconciliation in Grassroots People's Courts\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.23977/law.2023.020602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The People's Court of District S has been actively exploring the mechanism of criminal reconciliation in public prosecution cases since early 2010, and in the past three years, criminal reconciliation cases have achieved certain legal and social effects, but also revealed some shortcomings and shortcomings in the application of procedures. However, this legislation is unable to meet the realistic needs of criminal judicial practice, especially the grassroots criminal judicial practice, and there are problems of application, mode and limit, etc. In future judicial practice, it is necessary to enhance the operability of the initiation of the procedure, improve the standardization of the conduct of the procedure, increase the possibility of equal application, and establish supporting mechanisms to guarantee the function of reconciliation In future judicial practice, there is a need to enhance the operation of the procedure, improve the regulation of the procedure, enhance the possibility of equal application, and establish supporting mechanisms to guarantee the full play of the function of reconciliation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

S区人民法院从2010年初开始积极探索公诉案件刑事和解机制,近三年来,刑事和解案件取得了一定的法律和社会效果,但在程序适用上也暴露出一些不足和不足。然而,这一立法还不能满足刑事司法实践特别是基层刑事司法实践的现实需要,存在适用、模式、限制等问题。在未来的司法实践中,需要增强程序启动的可操作性,提高程序行为的规范性,增加平等适用的可能性,建立配套机制保障和解功能;在未来的司法实践中,需要增强程序的可操作性,完善程序的规范性,增强平等适用的可能性;建立配套机制,保障和解功能的充分发挥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Practice and Improvement of Criminal Reconciliation in Grassroots People's Courts
The People's Court of District S has been actively exploring the mechanism of criminal reconciliation in public prosecution cases since early 2010, and in the past three years, criminal reconciliation cases have achieved certain legal and social effects, but also revealed some shortcomings and shortcomings in the application of procedures. However, this legislation is unable to meet the realistic needs of criminal judicial practice, especially the grassroots criminal judicial practice, and there are problems of application, mode and limit, etc. In future judicial practice, it is necessary to enhance the operability of the initiation of the procedure, improve the standardization of the conduct of the procedure, increase the possibility of equal application, and establish supporting mechanisms to guarantee the function of reconciliation In future judicial practice, there is a need to enhance the operation of the procedure, improve the regulation of the procedure, enhance the possibility of equal application, and establish supporting mechanisms to guarantee the full play of the function of reconciliation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信