商业天使与传统社会和世俗理性社会的企业家的关系:中国、埃及和伊朗对比了德国和挪威

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Mahsa Samsami
{"title":"商业天使与传统社会和世俗理性社会的企业家的关系:中国、埃及和伊朗对比了德国和挪威","authors":"Mahsa Samsami","doi":"10.1504/ejim.2023.133426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business angels fund entrepreneurs starting a business. The entrepreneurs may be family members, relatives, co-workers, friends or strangers. Funding occurs in a social context such as institutions and culture. Family is more important in traditional than in modern or secular-rational culture, where formal institutions and generalised trust are stronger, and expectedly promote investment in strangers. We examine funding in traditional societies, China, Egypt and Iran, and in secular-rational societies, Germany and Norway. A representative sample of 16,223 investors reported ties with entrepreneurs. Recipients of funds are found to be close family as often in secular-rational culture as in traditional culture, but recipients are extended family and friends more often in traditional than in secular-rational culture. Conversely, recipients are strangers more often in secular-rational culture than in traditional culture. These findings contribute to theorising about the socio-cultural context of funding for entrepreneurial enterprising.","PeriodicalId":51631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business angels' ties with entrepreneurs in traditional and secular-rational societies: China, Egypt and Iran contrasted Germany and Norway\",\"authors\":\"Mahsa Samsami\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ejim.2023.133426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business angels fund entrepreneurs starting a business. The entrepreneurs may be family members, relatives, co-workers, friends or strangers. Funding occurs in a social context such as institutions and culture. Family is more important in traditional than in modern or secular-rational culture, where formal institutions and generalised trust are stronger, and expectedly promote investment in strangers. We examine funding in traditional societies, China, Egypt and Iran, and in secular-rational societies, Germany and Norway. A representative sample of 16,223 investors reported ties with entrepreneurs. Recipients of funds are found to be close family as often in secular-rational culture as in traditional culture, but recipients are extended family and friends more often in traditional than in secular-rational culture. Conversely, recipients are strangers more often in secular-rational culture than in traditional culture. These findings contribute to theorising about the socio-cultural context of funding for entrepreneurial enterprising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of International Management\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of International Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ejim.2023.133426\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ejim.2023.133426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

商业天使为创业的企业家提供资金。企业家可能是家庭成员、亲戚、同事、朋友或陌生人。资助发生在社会背景下,如制度和文化。家庭在传统文化中比在现代或世俗理性文化中更为重要,在现代或世俗理性文化中,正式制度和普遍信任更为强大,并预期会促进对陌生人的投资。我们考察了传统社会(中国、埃及和伊朗)和世俗理性社会(德国和挪威)的资助情况。有代表性的16223名投资者表示与企业家有联系。研究发现,在世俗理性文化中,与传统文化中一样,基金的接受者往往是亲密的家庭成员,但在传统文化中,基金的接受者往往是大家庭成员和朋友,而在世俗理性文化中则相反。相反,接受者在世俗理性文化中比在传统文化中更常是陌生人。这些发现有助于将创业企业融资的社会文化背景理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Business angels' ties with entrepreneurs in traditional and secular-rational societies: China, Egypt and Iran contrasted Germany and Norway
Business angels fund entrepreneurs starting a business. The entrepreneurs may be family members, relatives, co-workers, friends or strangers. Funding occurs in a social context such as institutions and culture. Family is more important in traditional than in modern or secular-rational culture, where formal institutions and generalised trust are stronger, and expectedly promote investment in strangers. We examine funding in traditional societies, China, Egypt and Iran, and in secular-rational societies, Germany and Norway. A representative sample of 16,223 investors reported ties with entrepreneurs. Recipients of funds are found to be close family as often in secular-rational culture as in traditional culture, but recipients are extended family and friends more often in traditional than in secular-rational culture. Conversely, recipients are strangers more often in secular-rational culture than in traditional culture. These findings contribute to theorising about the socio-cultural context of funding for entrepreneurial enterprising.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: EJIM is the first international journal devoted entirely to fostering an understanding of issues in international management theory and practice in the newly expanded European arena – including the underrepresented regions of Northern, Central and Eastern Europe – and to providing both conceptual and functional implications useful for the further development of research, teaching practices, and managerial techniques. EJIM also solicits literature that allows for a broader interpretation of research – it welcomes not only papers which adhere to the most common research standards (i.e., largely based on hypothesis testing using quantitative methods), but also those that introduce a more European perspective through qualitative and interdisciplinary contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信