康德论命题意旨与知识

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Lewis Wang
{"title":"康德论命题意旨与知识","authors":"Lewis Wang","doi":"10.1515/kantyb-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores Kant’s account of propositional content and its implications for the relationship between his notions of knowledge ( Wissen ) and cognition ( Erkenntnis ). While previous commentators commonly read Kant as holding a Fregean theory of propositional content, in this paper I argue that Kant’s theory of propositional content aligns more closely with Peter Hanks’ recent account. According to my reading, Kant holds that individual acts of judging are both ontologically and explanatorily prior to propositions or Kantian judgments ( Urteil ). Furthermore, on my reading, acts of judging for Kant are acts of assertively predicating a property of an object rather than merely acts of neutral predication. This reading challenges the lately popular view that Kant’s notions of knowledge and cognition are not only distinct but also disjunct. I instead suggest that we should regard Kantian knowledge that requires cognitions as its grounds as a species of Kantian cognitions.","PeriodicalId":41181,"journal":{"name":"Kant Yearbook","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kant on Propositional Content and Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Lewis Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/kantyb-2023-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores Kant’s account of propositional content and its implications for the relationship between his notions of knowledge ( Wissen ) and cognition ( Erkenntnis ). While previous commentators commonly read Kant as holding a Fregean theory of propositional content, in this paper I argue that Kant’s theory of propositional content aligns more closely with Peter Hanks’ recent account. According to my reading, Kant holds that individual acts of judging are both ontologically and explanatorily prior to propositions or Kantian judgments ( Urteil ). Furthermore, on my reading, acts of judging for Kant are acts of assertively predicating a property of an object rather than merely acts of neutral predication. This reading challenges the lately popular view that Kant’s notions of knowledge and cognition are not only distinct but also disjunct. I instead suggest that we should regard Kantian knowledge that requires cognitions as its grounds as a species of Kantian cognitions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kant Yearbook\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kant Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2023-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kant Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了康德关于命题意旨的论述及其对他的知识概念(Wissen)和认知概念(Erkenntnis)之间关系的启示。虽然以前的评论家通常认为康德持有弗雷格的命题意旨理论,但在本文中,我认为康德的命题意旨理论与彼得·汉克斯最近的说法更接近。根据我的阅读,康德认为个人的判断行为在本体论上和解释性上都先于命题或康德的判断(Urteil)。此外,根据我的阅读,康德的判断行为是对一个对象的属性进行断言的行为,而不仅仅是中立的预测行为。这种阅读挑战了最近流行的观点,即康德的知识和认知的概念不仅是不同的,而且是脱节的。相反,我建议我们应该把以认识为根据的康德知识看作是康德认识的一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kant on Propositional Content and Knowledge
Abstract This paper explores Kant’s account of propositional content and its implications for the relationship between his notions of knowledge ( Wissen ) and cognition ( Erkenntnis ). While previous commentators commonly read Kant as holding a Fregean theory of propositional content, in this paper I argue that Kant’s theory of propositional content aligns more closely with Peter Hanks’ recent account. According to my reading, Kant holds that individual acts of judging are both ontologically and explanatorily prior to propositions or Kantian judgments ( Urteil ). Furthermore, on my reading, acts of judging for Kant are acts of assertively predicating a property of an object rather than merely acts of neutral predication. This reading challenges the lately popular view that Kant’s notions of knowledge and cognition are not only distinct but also disjunct. I instead suggest that we should regard Kantian knowledge that requires cognitions as its grounds as a species of Kantian cognitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kant Yearbook
Kant Yearbook PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Kant Yearbook is an international journal that publishes articles, historical or systematic, on the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It is the yearbook′s goal to intensify innovative research on Kant on the international scale. Articles are double-blind peer reviewed by an internationally renowned editorial board. Each issue is dedicated to a specific topic announced through a call for papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信