{"title":"中国最高人民法院就新专利法实施后的第一起药品专利联动案作出裁决","authors":"Hongxuyang Lu","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the first case regarding the pharmaceutical patent linkage regime in China, the Supreme People’s Court of China ruled that the validity of a patent did not affect a pharmaceutical patent linkage case. Whether the technical solution of the generic drug falls within the scope of protection of a patent should be judged based on the submitted application for marketing authorization, instead of the actual technical solution implemented.","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Supreme People’s Court of China ruled on the first pharmaceutical patent linkage case after the new Patent Law\",\"authors\":\"Hongxuyang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jiplp/jpad004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the first case regarding the pharmaceutical patent linkage regime in China, the Supreme People’s Court of China ruled that the validity of a patent did not affect a pharmaceutical patent linkage case. Whether the technical solution of the generic drug falls within the scope of protection of a patent should be judged based on the submitted application for marketing authorization, instead of the actual technical solution implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Supreme People’s Court of China ruled on the first pharmaceutical patent linkage case after the new Patent Law
Abstract In the first case regarding the pharmaceutical patent linkage regime in China, the Supreme People’s Court of China ruled that the validity of a patent did not affect a pharmaceutical patent linkage case. Whether the technical solution of the generic drug falls within the scope of protection of a patent should be judged based on the submitted application for marketing authorization, instead of the actual technical solution implemented.