EHS快速指南:基于证据的欧洲关于造口旁疝预防的建议——包括ESCP和EAES的参与

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Cesare Stabilini, Filip E. Muysoms, Alexander A. Tzanis, Lisa Rossi, Ourania Koutsiouroumpa, Dimitris Mavridis, Michel Adamina, Umberto Bracale, Henk-Thijs Brandsma, Stéphanie O. Breukink, Manuel López Cano, Samantha Cole, Suzanne Doré, Kristian Kiim Jensen, Marianne Krogsgaard, Neil J. Smart, Christoffer Odensten, Chantal Tielemans, Stavros A. Antoniou
{"title":"EHS快速指南:基于证据的欧洲关于造口旁疝预防的建议——包括ESCP和EAES的参与","authors":"Cesare Stabilini, Filip E. Muysoms, Alexander A. Tzanis, Lisa Rossi, Ourania Koutsiouroumpa, Dimitris Mavridis, Michel Adamina, Umberto Bracale, Henk-Thijs Brandsma, Stéphanie O. Breukink, Manuel López Cano, Samantha Cole, Suzanne Doré, Kristian Kiim Jensen, Marianne Krogsgaard, Neil J. Smart, Christoffer Odensten, Chantal Tielemans, Stavros A. Antoniou","doi":"10.3389/jaws.2023.11549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Growing evidence on the use of mesh as a prophylactic measure to prevent parastomal hernia and advances in guideline development methods prompted an update of a previous guideline on parastomal hernia prevention. Objective: To develop evidence-based, trustworthy recommendations, informed by an interdisciplinary panel of stakeholders. Methods: We updated a previous systematic review on the use of a prophylactic mesh for end colostomy, and we synthesized evidence using pairwise meta-analysis. A European panel of surgeons, stoma care nurses, and patients developed an evidence-to-decision framework in line with GRADE and Guidelines International Network standards, moderated by a certified guideline methodologist. The framework considered benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, patients’ preferences and values, cost and resources considerations, acceptability, equity and feasibility. Results: The certainty of the evidence was moderate for parastomal hernia and low for major morbidity, surgery for parastomal hernia, and quality of life. There was unanimous consensus among panel members for a conditional recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy and fair life expectancy, and a strong recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients at high risk to develop a parastomal hernia. Conclusion: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, interdisciplinary recommendations on the use of prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy. Further, it identifies research gaps, and discusses implications for stakeholders, including overcoming barriers to implementation and specific considerations regarding validity.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EHS Rapid Guideline: Evidence-Informed European Recommendations on Parastomal Hernia Prevention—With ESCP and EAES Participation\",\"authors\":\"Cesare Stabilini, Filip E. Muysoms, Alexander A. Tzanis, Lisa Rossi, Ourania Koutsiouroumpa, Dimitris Mavridis, Michel Adamina, Umberto Bracale, Henk-Thijs Brandsma, Stéphanie O. Breukink, Manuel López Cano, Samantha Cole, Suzanne Doré, Kristian Kiim Jensen, Marianne Krogsgaard, Neil J. Smart, Christoffer Odensten, Chantal Tielemans, Stavros A. Antoniou\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/jaws.2023.11549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Growing evidence on the use of mesh as a prophylactic measure to prevent parastomal hernia and advances in guideline development methods prompted an update of a previous guideline on parastomal hernia prevention. Objective: To develop evidence-based, trustworthy recommendations, informed by an interdisciplinary panel of stakeholders. Methods: We updated a previous systematic review on the use of a prophylactic mesh for end colostomy, and we synthesized evidence using pairwise meta-analysis. A European panel of surgeons, stoma care nurses, and patients developed an evidence-to-decision framework in line with GRADE and Guidelines International Network standards, moderated by a certified guideline methodologist. The framework considered benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, patients’ preferences and values, cost and resources considerations, acceptability, equity and feasibility. Results: The certainty of the evidence was moderate for parastomal hernia and low for major morbidity, surgery for parastomal hernia, and quality of life. There was unanimous consensus among panel members for a conditional recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy and fair life expectancy, and a strong recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients at high risk to develop a parastomal hernia. Conclusion: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, interdisciplinary recommendations on the use of prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy. Further, it identifies research gaps, and discusses implications for stakeholders, including overcoming barriers to implementation and specific considerations regarding validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2023.11549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2023.11549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:越来越多的证据表明使用补片作为预防造口旁疝的预防措施,以及指南制定方法的进步,促使先前的造口旁疝预防指南进行了更新。目标:制定基于证据的、值得信赖的建议,由跨学科的利益相关者小组提供信息。方法:我们更新了先前关于使用预防性补片进行末端结肠造口的系统综述,并使用两两荟萃分析综合了证据。一个由外科医生、造口护理护士和患者组成的欧洲小组根据GRADE和指南国际网络标准制定了一个从证据到决策的框架,由一名认证指南方法学家主持。该框架考虑了益处和危害、证据的确定性、患者的偏好和价值观、成本和资源考虑、可接受性、公平性和可行性。结果:对于造口旁疝,证据的确定性为中等,对于主要发病率、造口旁疝的手术和生活质量,证据的确定性为低。专家组成员一致同意有条件地推荐在终末结肠造口且预期寿命较长的患者中使用预防性补片,并强烈推荐在发生造口旁疝的高风险患者中使用预防性补片。结论:本快速指南提供了基于证据的跨学科建议,用于末端结肠造口患者预防性补片的使用。此外,它还确定了研究差距,并讨论了对利益相关者的影响,包括克服实施障碍和关于有效性的具体考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EHS Rapid Guideline: Evidence-Informed European Recommendations on Parastomal Hernia Prevention—With ESCP and EAES Participation
Background: Growing evidence on the use of mesh as a prophylactic measure to prevent parastomal hernia and advances in guideline development methods prompted an update of a previous guideline on parastomal hernia prevention. Objective: To develop evidence-based, trustworthy recommendations, informed by an interdisciplinary panel of stakeholders. Methods: We updated a previous systematic review on the use of a prophylactic mesh for end colostomy, and we synthesized evidence using pairwise meta-analysis. A European panel of surgeons, stoma care nurses, and patients developed an evidence-to-decision framework in line with GRADE and Guidelines International Network standards, moderated by a certified guideline methodologist. The framework considered benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, patients’ preferences and values, cost and resources considerations, acceptability, equity and feasibility. Results: The certainty of the evidence was moderate for parastomal hernia and low for major morbidity, surgery for parastomal hernia, and quality of life. There was unanimous consensus among panel members for a conditional recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy and fair life expectancy, and a strong recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients at high risk to develop a parastomal hernia. Conclusion: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, interdisciplinary recommendations on the use of prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy. Further, it identifies research gaps, and discusses implications for stakeholders, including overcoming barriers to implementation and specific considerations regarding validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信