超声乳化术中局部麻醉对患者疼痛感及外科医生满意度的影响

Syed Wajahat Ali Rizvi, Ziya Siddiqui, Sheerin Fatima, Adeeb Alam Khan, Humayoun Ashraf
{"title":"超声乳化术中局部麻醉对患者疼痛感及外科医生满意度的影响","authors":"Syed Wajahat Ali Rizvi, Ziya Siddiqui, Sheerin Fatima, Adeeb Alam Khan, Humayoun Ashraf","doi":"10.18231/j.ijceo.2023.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the cataract surgery has taken the quantum leaps, so does the advancements in various anaesthetic techniques, aiming to provide a safer, painless and comfortable surgery. Topical anaesthesia is a less invasive anaesthetic option which provides adequate analgesia with wide margin of safety. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical anaesthesia as a routine in a standard phacoemulsification surgery. A total of200 patients scheduled for routine phacoemulsification were enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized comparative clinical study. Patients were then distributed to either topical anaesthesia group (TA) or peribulbar anaesthesia group (PA) to evaluate for patient and surgeon satisfaction, and intraoperative complications. The study groups were comparable demographically. Pain scores were higher during late stages of surgery in TA (p<0.01), while higher scores were noticeable in PA (p<0.01) during administration and in the postoperative periods. Significantly higher rate of chemosis was seen in PA (p<0.01). The patients in the TA had an overall better surgical experience as compared to the PA (p<0.01).Though surgeon does note higher per-operative pain perception (p=0.027) and ocular motility (p<0.01) in the TA there was no significant difference as far as ease of surgery was concerned. Despite higher per-operative pain perception most of the patients describe their surgical experience with topical anaesthesia as satisfactory. In view of its minimally invasive nature, topical anaesthesia is a safer alternative to peribulbar anaesthesia practically avoiding all block related complications especially in at risk eyes, and thus can be safely administered as a routine in phacoemulsification surgery.","PeriodicalId":13485,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient’s pain perception and surgeon satisfaction with topical anaesthsia in phacoemulsification surgery\",\"authors\":\"Syed Wajahat Ali Rizvi, Ziya Siddiqui, Sheerin Fatima, Adeeb Alam Khan, Humayoun Ashraf\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijceo.2023.066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the cataract surgery has taken the quantum leaps, so does the advancements in various anaesthetic techniques, aiming to provide a safer, painless and comfortable surgery. Topical anaesthesia is a less invasive anaesthetic option which provides adequate analgesia with wide margin of safety. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical anaesthesia as a routine in a standard phacoemulsification surgery. A total of200 patients scheduled for routine phacoemulsification were enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized comparative clinical study. Patients were then distributed to either topical anaesthesia group (TA) or peribulbar anaesthesia group (PA) to evaluate for patient and surgeon satisfaction, and intraoperative complications. The study groups were comparable demographically. Pain scores were higher during late stages of surgery in TA (p<0.01), while higher scores were noticeable in PA (p<0.01) during administration and in the postoperative periods. Significantly higher rate of chemosis was seen in PA (p<0.01). The patients in the TA had an overall better surgical experience as compared to the PA (p<0.01).Though surgeon does note higher per-operative pain perception (p=0.027) and ocular motility (p<0.01) in the TA there was no significant difference as far as ease of surgery was concerned. Despite higher per-operative pain perception most of the patients describe their surgical experience with topical anaesthesia as satisfactory. In view of its minimally invasive nature, topical anaesthesia is a safer alternative to peribulbar anaesthesia practically avoiding all block related complications especially in at risk eyes, and thus can be safely administered as a routine in phacoemulsification surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2023.066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2023.066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着白内障手术的突飞猛进,各种麻醉技术也在不断进步,旨在提供更安全、无痛和舒适的手术。表面麻醉是一种侵入性较小的麻醉选择,它提供了足够的镇痛和广泛的安全余地。我们的目的是评估表面麻醉作为常规超声乳化术的疗效。在一项前瞻性、非随机对照临床研究中,共有200名患者计划进行常规超声乳化术。然后将患者分配到局部麻醉组(TA)或球周麻醉组(PA),以评估患者和外科医生的满意度以及术中并发症。这些研究组在人口统计学上具有可比性。TA组在手术后期疼痛评分较高(p<0.01),而PA组在给药期间和术后疼痛评分明显较高(p<0.01)。PA组化脓率明显高于PA组(p<0.01)。总的来说,TA组的患者比PA组有更好的手术体验(p<0.01)。尽管外科医生确实注意到TA的手术前疼痛感(p=0.027)和眼动(p=0.027;0.01)更高,但就手术的容易程度而言,没有显著差异。尽管手术前疼痛感较高,但大多数患者对局部麻醉的手术经验表示满意。鉴于其微创性,局部麻醉是一种比球周麻醉更安全的选择,实际上避免了所有与阻滞相关的并发症,特别是在危险的眼睛中,因此可以安全地作为常规超声乳化手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient’s pain perception and surgeon satisfaction with topical anaesthsia in phacoemulsification surgery
As the cataract surgery has taken the quantum leaps, so does the advancements in various anaesthetic techniques, aiming to provide a safer, painless and comfortable surgery. Topical anaesthesia is a less invasive anaesthetic option which provides adequate analgesia with wide margin of safety. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical anaesthesia as a routine in a standard phacoemulsification surgery. A total of200 patients scheduled for routine phacoemulsification were enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized comparative clinical study. Patients were then distributed to either topical anaesthesia group (TA) or peribulbar anaesthesia group (PA) to evaluate for patient and surgeon satisfaction, and intraoperative complications. The study groups were comparable demographically. Pain scores were higher during late stages of surgery in TA (p&#60;0.01), while higher scores were noticeable in PA (p&#60;0.01) during administration and in the postoperative periods. Significantly higher rate of chemosis was seen in PA (p&#60;0.01). The patients in the TA had an overall better surgical experience as compared to the PA (p&#60;0.01).Though surgeon does note higher per-operative pain perception (p=0.027) and ocular motility (p&#60;0.01) in the TA there was no significant difference as far as ease of surgery was concerned. Despite higher per-operative pain perception most of the patients describe their surgical experience with topical anaesthesia as satisfactory. In view of its minimally invasive nature, topical anaesthesia is a safer alternative to peribulbar anaesthesia practically avoiding all block related complications especially in at risk eyes, and thus can be safely administered as a routine in phacoemulsification surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信