笛福游记中的错误形式:可惩处的和可宽恕的错误

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pat Rogers
{"title":"笛福游记中的错误形式:可惩处的和可宽恕的错误","authors":"Pat Rogers","doi":"10.1111/1754-0208.12910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article explores forms that error may take in a historical work, here Daniel Defoe's <i>Tour thro' Britain</i>. An introduction attempts to place the book in relation to the production of knowledge, as compared with books in allied genres. The first main section considers the nature and causes of error, divided into categories of culpable and venial mistakes. The second looks at the way in which the <i>Tour</i> textualizes the author's doubts concerning the accuracy of sources. The third reviews in detail three cases where Defoe's error has become evident in the light of modern scholarly knowledge, techniques, and procedures. A brief conclusion suggests implications for our approach to literature of the past.</p>","PeriodicalId":55946,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","volume":"46 4","pages":"421-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Forms of Error in Defoe's Tour: Culpable and Venial Mistakes\",\"authors\":\"Pat Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-0208.12910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The article explores forms that error may take in a historical work, here Daniel Defoe's <i>Tour thro' Britain</i>. An introduction attempts to place the book in relation to the production of knowledge, as compared with books in allied genres. The first main section considers the nature and causes of error, divided into categories of culpable and venial mistakes. The second looks at the way in which the <i>Tour</i> textualizes the author's doubts concerning the accuracy of sources. The third reviews in detail three cases where Defoe's error has become evident in the light of modern scholarly knowledge, techniques, and procedures. A brief conclusion suggests implications for our approach to literature of the past.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"421-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12910\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以丹尼尔·笛福的《穿越英国》为例,探讨历史作品中可能出现的错误形式。引言试图将这本书与相关类型的书籍进行比较,并将其与知识的产生联系起来。第一个主要部分考虑错误的性质和原因,分为可判错误和可判错误两类。第二部分着眼于《图》如何将作者对资料来源准确性的怀疑文本化。第三部分详细回顾了笛福的错误在现代学术知识、技术和程序中变得明显的三个案例。一个简短的结论为我们研究过去文学提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Forms of Error in Defoe's Tour: Culpable and Venial Mistakes

The article explores forms that error may take in a historical work, here Daniel Defoe's Tour thro' Britain. An introduction attempts to place the book in relation to the production of knowledge, as compared with books in allied genres. The first main section considers the nature and causes of error, divided into categories of culpable and venial mistakes. The second looks at the way in which the Tour textualizes the author's doubts concerning the accuracy of sources. The third reviews in detail three cases where Defoe's error has become evident in the light of modern scholarly knowledge, techniques, and procedures. A brief conclusion suggests implications for our approach to literature of the past.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信