中介考古学:论后期拜占庭艺术和物质文化中的蒙古元素

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Nikolaos Vryzidis
{"title":"中介考古学:论后期拜占庭艺术和物质文化中的蒙古元素","authors":"Nikolaos Vryzidis","doi":"10.1163/26662523-bja10015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Later Byzantine (1261–1453) diplomacy was generally characterised by pragmatism, especially in the empire’s choice of allies that could foster its political stability and mitigate its financial burdens. Among its more distant allies were the different Mongol polities that stretched from Central Asia up to the Caucasus and Eastern Europe. Despite not being immediate neighbours, the relationship between Byzantium and the Mongols was marked by intermediation, both in terms of the actors that functioned across the two realms and of the service the one could provide to the interests of the other. Within this frame, the following article will attempt a preliminary assessment of the Mongol element in later Byzantine art and material culture, and its possible use as a secondary source on this complex relationship. It will argue that while the Mongol contribution to Byzantine art and material culture was visible especially during the fourteenth century, there are instances which reveal a certain ambivalence towards it.","PeriodicalId":34828,"journal":{"name":"Crossroads","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Archaeology of Intermediation: Prolegomena on Mongol Elements in Later Byzantine Art and Material Culture\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Vryzidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/26662523-bja10015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Later Byzantine (1261–1453) diplomacy was generally characterised by pragmatism, especially in the empire’s choice of allies that could foster its political stability and mitigate its financial burdens. Among its more distant allies were the different Mongol polities that stretched from Central Asia up to the Caucasus and Eastern Europe. Despite not being immediate neighbours, the relationship between Byzantium and the Mongols was marked by intermediation, both in terms of the actors that functioned across the two realms and of the service the one could provide to the interests of the other. Within this frame, the following article will attempt a preliminary assessment of the Mongol element in later Byzantine art and material culture, and its possible use as a secondary source on this complex relationship. It will argue that while the Mongol contribution to Byzantine art and material culture was visible especially during the fourteenth century, there are instances which reveal a certain ambivalence towards it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crossroads\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crossroads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/26662523-bja10015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crossroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26662523-bja10015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后期拜占庭(1261-1453)的外交通常以实用主义为特征,特别是在帝国选择盟友时,可以促进其政治稳定并减轻其财政负担。在更远的盟友中,有从中亚一直延伸到高加索和东欧的不同的蒙古政体。尽管不是近邻,但拜占庭和蒙古之间的关系以中间人为标志,无论是在两个王国之间的角色,还是在一方可以为另一方的利益提供服务方面。在这个框架内,下面的文章将尝试初步评估蒙古元素在后来的拜占庭艺术和物质文化中,以及它作为这种复杂关系的次要来源的可能性。它将争辩说,虽然蒙古对拜占庭艺术和物质文化的贡献是显而易见的,特别是在14世纪,但有一些例子显示出对它的某种矛盾心理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Archaeology of Intermediation: Prolegomena on Mongol Elements in Later Byzantine Art and Material Culture
Abstract Later Byzantine (1261–1453) diplomacy was generally characterised by pragmatism, especially in the empire’s choice of allies that could foster its political stability and mitigate its financial burdens. Among its more distant allies were the different Mongol polities that stretched from Central Asia up to the Caucasus and Eastern Europe. Despite not being immediate neighbours, the relationship between Byzantium and the Mongols was marked by intermediation, both in terms of the actors that functioned across the two realms and of the service the one could provide to the interests of the other. Within this frame, the following article will attempt a preliminary assessment of the Mongol element in later Byzantine art and material culture, and its possible use as a secondary source on this complex relationship. It will argue that while the Mongol contribution to Byzantine art and material culture was visible especially during the fourteenth century, there are instances which reveal a certain ambivalence towards it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crossroads
Crossroads Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信