Advantages of Taking the History of Women's International Thought Seriously Women’s International Thought: Towards a New Canon , by Patricia Owens, Katharina Rietzler, Kimberly Hutchings, and Sarah C. Dunstan, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, 776 pp., £29.99, ISBN 9781108999762

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See full cite in bibliography, excerpted in this book, pp. 41–5.2 See, e.g. Owens and Rietzler, Women’s International Thought; Huber, Pietsch, and Rietzler, “Women’s International Thought and the New Professions, 1900-1940”; Owens, “Women and the History of International Thought”; Tickner and True, “A Century of International Relations Feminism”; Hutchings and Owens, “Women Thinkers and the Canon of International Thought.”3 See, e.g. Tickner, “Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism”; Barkin and Sjoberg, “The Queer Art of Failed IR?”; Steans, “Engaging from the Margins”; Parashar, “What Wars and ‘War Bodies’”, for a few of many examples – this is also a theme in the volume under review.4 See full cite in bibliography, reprinted in this book, pp. 201–3.5 See full cite in bibliography, excerpted in this book, pp. 488–92.6 See, e.g. Sharpley-Whiting, Negritude Women; Boittin, “In Black and White”; Moïse, “Antillean Women and Black Internationalism”; Blain and Gill, The Whole World Over.7 It is not clear to me that it is correct for this sentence to be in the past tense, since the field still does often devalue traits associated with femininity and encourage women to adapt masculine traits, but I left it in the past tense because it seemed appropriate contextually.