A. V. Savilov, M. Jain, A. S. Tivtikyan, M. E. Kotsepuga, D. M. Anokhin, L. M. Samokhodskaya, D. A. Okhobotov, S. P. Shershnev, A. A. Kamalov
{"title":"复发性尿石症患者血清骨保护素水平的变化","authors":"A. V. Savilov, M. Jain, A. S. Tivtikyan, M. E. Kotsepuga, D. M. Anokhin, L. M. Samokhodskaya, D. A. Okhobotov, S. P. Shershnev, A. A. Kamalov","doi":"10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-77-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In our earlier research on the role of genetic factors in the development of recurrent urolithiasis, a significant relationship was found between the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphism rs3134057 in the osteoprotegerin (OPG) gene and the development of this disease. The above-mentioned single-nucleotide polymorphism is intronic, therefore, it is unable to involve the structure and functions of the OPG but to affect its expression. Thus, the study of serum OPG level may have diagnostic significance in recurrent urolithiasis. Objective. To study the relationship of serum OPG level with the presence of recurrent urolithiasis, as well as the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism rs3134057 on the OPG level. Materials & methods. One hundred and fifteen volunteers were included in the study from January 2021 to January 2022. Of the 115 participants, 45 (main group #1) were diagnosed with recurrent urolithiasis and localisation of the main stone in one of the ureters, 28 participants (main group #2) had previously suffered a single episode of acute renal colic followed by surgical treatment or stone self-discharge and were stone-free at the time of the study. Forty-two control group respondents were free of urolithiasis, including family history of urolithiasis. The serum OPG levels was determined by enzyme immunoassay using the Human OPG ELISA kit ab100617 (\"Abcam plc\", Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer's advice. Results. The analysis revealed that the serum OPG levels were significantly higher in the main group #1 than in the control group (median: 9.02 vs. 3.635, p = 0.012). When analyzing the relationship between the concentration of OPG in serum and the AA + AG genotype versus GG according to rs3134057 of the OPG gene, no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). The same result was obtained when comparing groups with AA vs. AG vs. GG genotypes (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The present study showed that an increased serum OPG level in patients with recurrent urolithiasis may indicate the presence of a relapse of the disease. Further study in large samples will finally confirm the significance of OPG as a marker of relapse, including in genetically determined forms.","PeriodicalId":490070,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik urologii","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes of serum osteoprotegerin level in recurrent urolithiasis\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Savilov, M. Jain, A. S. Tivtikyan, M. E. Kotsepuga, D. M. Anokhin, L. M. Samokhodskaya, D. A. Okhobotov, S. P. Shershnev, A. A. Kamalov\",\"doi\":\"10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-77-86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. In our earlier research on the role of genetic factors in the development of recurrent urolithiasis, a significant relationship was found between the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphism rs3134057 in the osteoprotegerin (OPG) gene and the development of this disease. The above-mentioned single-nucleotide polymorphism is intronic, therefore, it is unable to involve the structure and functions of the OPG but to affect its expression. Thus, the study of serum OPG level may have diagnostic significance in recurrent urolithiasis. Objective. To study the relationship of serum OPG level with the presence of recurrent urolithiasis, as well as the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism rs3134057 on the OPG level. Materials & methods. One hundred and fifteen volunteers were included in the study from January 2021 to January 2022. Of the 115 participants, 45 (main group #1) were diagnosed with recurrent urolithiasis and localisation of the main stone in one of the ureters, 28 participants (main group #2) had previously suffered a single episode of acute renal colic followed by surgical treatment or stone self-discharge and were stone-free at the time of the study. Forty-two control group respondents were free of urolithiasis, including family history of urolithiasis. The serum OPG levels was determined by enzyme immunoassay using the Human OPG ELISA kit ab100617 (\\\"Abcam plc\\\", Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer's advice. Results. The analysis revealed that the serum OPG levels were significantly higher in the main group #1 than in the control group (median: 9.02 vs. 3.635, p = 0.012). When analyzing the relationship between the concentration of OPG in serum and the AA + AG genotype versus GG according to rs3134057 of the OPG gene, no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). The same result was obtained when comparing groups with AA vs. AG vs. GG genotypes (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The present study showed that an increased serum OPG level in patients with recurrent urolithiasis may indicate the presence of a relapse of the disease. Further study in large samples will finally confirm the significance of OPG as a marker of relapse, including in genetically determined forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":490070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik urologii\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik urologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-77-86\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik urologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-77-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。在我们早期关于遗传因素在复发性尿石症发生中的作用的研究中,我们发现骨保护素(OPG)基因单核苷酸多态性rs3134057的存在与该疾病的发生有显著关系。上述单核苷酸多态性是内含子的,因此不能涉及OPG的结构和功能,而影响其表达。因此,研究血清OPG水平对复发性尿石症有一定的诊断意义。目标。研究血清OPG水平与复发性尿石症的关系,以及单核苷酸多态性rs3134057对OPG水平的影响。材料,方法。从2021年1月到2022年1月,共有115名志愿者参与了这项研究。在115名参与者中,45名(主要组#1)被诊断为复发性尿石症,主要结石位于输尿管之一,28名参与者(主要组#2)以前曾发生过一次急性肾绞痛,随后进行了手术治疗或结石自行排出,并且在研究时无结石。42名对照组受访者无尿石症,包括尿石症家族史。血清OPG水平采用酶免疫法测定,使用人OPG ELISA试剂盒ab100617(“Abcam plc”,Cambridge, UK),根据制造商的建议。结果。分析显示,主组1的血清OPG水平显著高于对照组(中位数:9.02 vs. 3.635, p = 0.012)。根据OPG基因rs3134057分析血清OPG浓度与AA + AG基因型与GG的关系,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。AA、AG和GG基因型组的比较结果相同(p >0.05)。结论。目前的研究表明,复发性尿石症患者血清OPG水平升高可能表明该疾病复发。对大样本的进一步研究将最终证实OPG作为复发标志的重要性,包括基因决定的复发形式。
Changes of serum osteoprotegerin level in recurrent urolithiasis
Introduction. In our earlier research on the role of genetic factors in the development of recurrent urolithiasis, a significant relationship was found between the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphism rs3134057 in the osteoprotegerin (OPG) gene and the development of this disease. The above-mentioned single-nucleotide polymorphism is intronic, therefore, it is unable to involve the structure and functions of the OPG but to affect its expression. Thus, the study of serum OPG level may have diagnostic significance in recurrent urolithiasis. Objective. To study the relationship of serum OPG level with the presence of recurrent urolithiasis, as well as the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism rs3134057 on the OPG level. Materials & methods. One hundred and fifteen volunteers were included in the study from January 2021 to January 2022. Of the 115 participants, 45 (main group #1) were diagnosed with recurrent urolithiasis and localisation of the main stone in one of the ureters, 28 participants (main group #2) had previously suffered a single episode of acute renal colic followed by surgical treatment or stone self-discharge and were stone-free at the time of the study. Forty-two control group respondents were free of urolithiasis, including family history of urolithiasis. The serum OPG levels was determined by enzyme immunoassay using the Human OPG ELISA kit ab100617 ("Abcam plc", Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer's advice. Results. The analysis revealed that the serum OPG levels were significantly higher in the main group #1 than in the control group (median: 9.02 vs. 3.635, p = 0.012). When analyzing the relationship between the concentration of OPG in serum and the AA + AG genotype versus GG according to rs3134057 of the OPG gene, no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). The same result was obtained when comparing groups with AA vs. AG vs. GG genotypes (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The present study showed that an increased serum OPG level in patients with recurrent urolithiasis may indicate the presence of a relapse of the disease. Further study in large samples will finally confirm the significance of OPG as a marker of relapse, including in genetically determined forms.