致力于种族正义作为一个白人女性在STEM:使用建构主义扎根理论探索白人行动主义

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Desiree Forsythe
{"title":"致力于种族正义作为一个白人女性在STEM:使用建构主义扎根理论探索白人行动主义","authors":"Desiree Forsythe","doi":"10.1080/00221546.2023.2265285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThere is a mountain of evidence demonstrating that students with marginalized, i.e. purposefully socially excluded, identities experience significantly worse academic and social outcomes in STEM disciplines. However, there has been less attention on how white women, who experience sexism due to their gender but are privileged due to their race, simultaneously contribute to and play a role in dismantling systemic racism. In this study, I used constructivist grounded theory to explore the process through which white women in STEM commit to racial justice both within and outside of their disciplines. Interviews with 36 white women in STEM across a range of disciplines helped build an emergent model that illustrated how participants advanced through three stages to move toward actionable anti-racist commitment. However, many participants struggled to connect STEM with their anti-racist practice, as many STEM disciplines lacked anti-racism curriculum and/or the ability to practice anti-racism within STEM. This model helps illustrate the complex process in which white women in STEM become committed to racial justice. Within STEM specifically, this research has direct implications for the importance of adding social contexts and anti-racist material directly into STEM curricula to foster anti-racist practices for future STEM professionals.KEYWORDS: White supremacyanti-racismSTEMwomenactivism Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In the context of this paper, marginalized focuses specifically on students who are white non-men or people of color. However, it is important to note that there are many marginalized students within STEM, including students with disabilities, students who are LGBGTQ+, and those who hold intersectional identities.","PeriodicalId":54209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Committing to Racial Justice as a White Woman in STEM: Using Constructivist Grounded Theory to Explore White Activism\",\"authors\":\"Desiree Forsythe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00221546.2023.2265285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThere is a mountain of evidence demonstrating that students with marginalized, i.e. purposefully socially excluded, identities experience significantly worse academic and social outcomes in STEM disciplines. However, there has been less attention on how white women, who experience sexism due to their gender but are privileged due to their race, simultaneously contribute to and play a role in dismantling systemic racism. In this study, I used constructivist grounded theory to explore the process through which white women in STEM commit to racial justice both within and outside of their disciplines. Interviews with 36 white women in STEM across a range of disciplines helped build an emergent model that illustrated how participants advanced through three stages to move toward actionable anti-racist commitment. However, many participants struggled to connect STEM with their anti-racist practice, as many STEM disciplines lacked anti-racism curriculum and/or the ability to practice anti-racism within STEM. This model helps illustrate the complex process in which white women in STEM become committed to racial justice. Within STEM specifically, this research has direct implications for the importance of adding social contexts and anti-racist material directly into STEM curricula to foster anti-racist practices for future STEM professionals.KEYWORDS: White supremacyanti-racismSTEMwomenactivism Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In the context of this paper, marginalized focuses specifically on students who are white non-men or people of color. However, it is important to note that there are many marginalized students within STEM, including students with disabilities, students who are LGBGTQ+, and those who hold intersectional identities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2265285\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2265285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】有大量证据表明,被边缘化的学生,即故意被社会排斥的学生,在STEM学科中的学术和社会结果明显更差。然而,由于性别而受到性别歧视,但由于种族而享有特权的白人女性如何同时为消除系统性种族主义做出贡献并发挥作用,却很少受到关注。在这项研究中,我使用了基于建构主义的理论来探索STEM中的白人女性在学科内外致力于种族正义的过程。对来自STEM领域多个学科的36名白人女性的采访帮助建立了一个新兴模型,该模型说明了参与者如何通过三个阶段走向可操作的反种族主义承诺。然而,许多参与者很难将STEM与他们的反种族主义实践联系起来,因为许多STEM学科缺乏反种族主义课程和/或在STEM中实践反种族主义的能力。这个模型有助于说明STEM领域的白人女性致力于种族正义的复杂过程。特别是在STEM领域,这项研究对直接将社会背景和反种族主义材料添加到STEM课程中以促进未来STEM专业人员反种族主义实践的重要性具有直接意义。关键词:白人至上主义;反种族主义;女性激进主义披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。在本文的语境中,边缘化特别关注白人非男性或有色人种的学生。然而,需要注意的是,在STEM领域有许多被边缘化的学生,包括残疾学生、LGBGTQ+学生和那些拥有交叉身份的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Committing to Racial Justice as a White Woman in STEM: Using Constructivist Grounded Theory to Explore White Activism
ABSTRACTThere is a mountain of evidence demonstrating that students with marginalized, i.e. purposefully socially excluded, identities experience significantly worse academic and social outcomes in STEM disciplines. However, there has been less attention on how white women, who experience sexism due to their gender but are privileged due to their race, simultaneously contribute to and play a role in dismantling systemic racism. In this study, I used constructivist grounded theory to explore the process through which white women in STEM commit to racial justice both within and outside of their disciplines. Interviews with 36 white women in STEM across a range of disciplines helped build an emergent model that illustrated how participants advanced through three stages to move toward actionable anti-racist commitment. However, many participants struggled to connect STEM with their anti-racist practice, as many STEM disciplines lacked anti-racism curriculum and/or the ability to practice anti-racism within STEM. This model helps illustrate the complex process in which white women in STEM become committed to racial justice. Within STEM specifically, this research has direct implications for the importance of adding social contexts and anti-racist material directly into STEM curricula to foster anti-racist practices for future STEM professionals.KEYWORDS: White supremacyanti-racismSTEMwomenactivism Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. In the context of this paper, marginalized focuses specifically on students who are white non-men or people of color. However, it is important to note that there are many marginalized students within STEM, including students with disabilities, students who are LGBGTQ+, and those who hold intersectional identities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education
Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1930, The Journal of Higher Education publishes original research reporting on the academic study of higher education as a broad enterprise. We publish the highest quality empirical, theoretically grounded work addressing the main functions of higher education and the dynamic role of the university in society. We seek to publish scholarship from a wide variety of theoretical perspectives and disciplinary orientations. Articles appearing in the Journal employ an array of methodological approaches, and we welcome work from scholars across a range of career stages. Comparative and international scholarship should make clear connections to the U.S. context. Manuscripts not appropriate for submission to the Journal include purely theoretical papers, methodological treatises, unsolicited essays and reviews, and non-academic, institutional, and program evaluations or reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信