无人机操作的GBAS -定位服务,垂直完整性和操作经验教训

Valentin Fischer, Sophie Jochems, Michael Jäger, Luciano Sarperi, Michael Felux
{"title":"无人机操作的GBAS -定位服务,垂直完整性和操作经验教训","authors":"Valentin Fischer, Sophie Jochems, Michael Jäger, Luciano Sarperi, Michael Felux","doi":"10.33012/2023.19288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In continuation of previous work, this paper addresses three challenges regarding the GBAS positioning service for UAV navigation. Firstly, the concept of ensuring the position integrity not only in the horizontal but also vertical domain is explored. As the GBAS positioning service as it is currently defined does not foresee vertical integrity, a vertical protection level, similar to the horizontal one, is developed. Secondly, the architecture and implementation of the system is shown such that real-time navigation is enabled. For this, the GBAS messages are received close to the GBAS ground station. They are then forwarded to a server via a TCP socket, stored into databases, and used for position calculation and error bounding. To ensure the timely message transmission and application we monitored the latency introduced by the architecture. Thirdly, during a dynamic flight the attitude of a drone may change frequently resulting in loss of track of satellites leading to a degradation of the navigation and integrity performance. This challenge is addressed by using a gimballed antenna mount. A test flight was carried out in May 2023 using a UAV at the glider airfield in Winterthur. For positioning and integrity evaluations corrections from the GBAS ground station at Zurich Airport (18 km away from Winterthur) were used. Results showed that the accuracy of the navigation solution was generally well below 1 m, horizontally and vertically. The protection level remained below 3.5 m horizontally and 9.5 m vertically. In both cases, the protection level was driven by the ephemeris error bounds. The monitoring of the latency indicated that the calculation lasts 0.09 s on average. This means that the calculation is sufficiently fast to prevent latency. Finally, using a gimballed antenna mount showed no significant improvements, as also for the static mount no significant number of satellites were lost.","PeriodicalId":498211,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GBAS for UAV Operations – The Positioning Service, Vertical Integrity and Operational Lessons Learned\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Fischer, Sophie Jochems, Michael Jäger, Luciano Sarperi, Michael Felux\",\"doi\":\"10.33012/2023.19288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In continuation of previous work, this paper addresses three challenges regarding the GBAS positioning service for UAV navigation. Firstly, the concept of ensuring the position integrity not only in the horizontal but also vertical domain is explored. As the GBAS positioning service as it is currently defined does not foresee vertical integrity, a vertical protection level, similar to the horizontal one, is developed. Secondly, the architecture and implementation of the system is shown such that real-time navigation is enabled. For this, the GBAS messages are received close to the GBAS ground station. They are then forwarded to a server via a TCP socket, stored into databases, and used for position calculation and error bounding. To ensure the timely message transmission and application we monitored the latency introduced by the architecture. Thirdly, during a dynamic flight the attitude of a drone may change frequently resulting in loss of track of satellites leading to a degradation of the navigation and integrity performance. This challenge is addressed by using a gimballed antenna mount. A test flight was carried out in May 2023 using a UAV at the glider airfield in Winterthur. For positioning and integrity evaluations corrections from the GBAS ground station at Zurich Airport (18 km away from Winterthur) were used. Results showed that the accuracy of the navigation solution was generally well below 1 m, horizontally and vertically. The protection level remained below 3.5 m horizontally and 9.5 m vertically. In both cases, the protection level was driven by the ephemeris error bounds. The monitoring of the latency indicated that the calculation lasts 0.09 s on average. This means that the calculation is sufficiently fast to prevent latency. Finally, using a gimballed antenna mount showed no significant improvements, as also for the static mount no significant number of satellites were lost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":498211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting\",\"volume\":\"301 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33012/2023.19288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33012/2023.19288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在前人工作的基础上,提出了GBAS定位服务在无人机导航中的三大挑战。首先,探讨了在水平和垂直领域保证位置完整性的概念;由于目前定义的GBAS定位服务无法预见垂直完整性,因此开发了类似于水平保护级别的垂直保护级别。其次,给出了系统的结构和实现,实现了实时导航。为此,GBAS电文在靠近GBAS地面站的地方接收。然后通过TCP套接字将它们转发到服务器,存储到数据库中,并用于位置计算和错误边界。为了保证消息的及时传输和应用,我们对架构引入的延迟进行了监控。第三,在动态飞行过程中,无人机姿态变化频繁,导致卫星失迹,导致导航性能和完整性性能下降。这一挑战是通过使用万向节天线支架来解决的。在2023年5月在温特图尔的滑翔机机场使用一架无人机进行了一次试飞。定位和完整性评估使用了苏黎世机场(距温特图尔18公里)GBAS地面站的校正数据。结果表明,在水平方向和垂直方向上,该导航方案的精度一般都在1 m以下。水平防护等级保持在3.5米以下,垂直防护等级保持在9.5米以下。在这两种情况下,保护级别都是由星历误差边界驱动的。对延迟的监测表明,计算平均持续0.09 s。这意味着计算足够快,可以避免延迟。最后,使用万向节天线支架没有显示出显著的改进,对于静态支架也是如此,没有显著数量的卫星丢失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GBAS for UAV Operations – The Positioning Service, Vertical Integrity and Operational Lessons Learned
In continuation of previous work, this paper addresses three challenges regarding the GBAS positioning service for UAV navigation. Firstly, the concept of ensuring the position integrity not only in the horizontal but also vertical domain is explored. As the GBAS positioning service as it is currently defined does not foresee vertical integrity, a vertical protection level, similar to the horizontal one, is developed. Secondly, the architecture and implementation of the system is shown such that real-time navigation is enabled. For this, the GBAS messages are received close to the GBAS ground station. They are then forwarded to a server via a TCP socket, stored into databases, and used for position calculation and error bounding. To ensure the timely message transmission and application we monitored the latency introduced by the architecture. Thirdly, during a dynamic flight the attitude of a drone may change frequently resulting in loss of track of satellites leading to a degradation of the navigation and integrity performance. This challenge is addressed by using a gimballed antenna mount. A test flight was carried out in May 2023 using a UAV at the glider airfield in Winterthur. For positioning and integrity evaluations corrections from the GBAS ground station at Zurich Airport (18 km away from Winterthur) were used. Results showed that the accuracy of the navigation solution was generally well below 1 m, horizontally and vertically. The protection level remained below 3.5 m horizontally and 9.5 m vertically. In both cases, the protection level was driven by the ephemeris error bounds. The monitoring of the latency indicated that the calculation lasts 0.09 s on average. This means that the calculation is sufficiently fast to prevent latency. Finally, using a gimballed antenna mount showed no significant improvements, as also for the static mount no significant number of satellites were lost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信