Taida Juliana Adorian, Luciane Ferreira de Moura, Ana Carolina Kohlrausch Klinger, Ana Betine Beutinger Bender, Caroline Sefrin Speroni, Fernanda Rodrigues Goulart Ferrigolo, Naglezi DeMenezes Lovatto, Leila Picolli da Silva
{"title":"加工鱼渣和熟鱼肠中植酸的抗氧化作用","authors":"Taida Juliana Adorian, Luciane Ferreira de Moura, Ana Carolina Kohlrausch Klinger, Ana Betine Beutinger Bender, Caroline Sefrin Speroni, Fernanda Rodrigues Goulart Ferrigolo, Naglezi DeMenezes Lovatto, Leila Picolli da Silva","doi":"10.1080/10498850.2023.2260825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe study evaluated the efficiency of phytic acid (PA) for stabilization of processed fish waste (PFW – ventral muscle and vertebral column without fins) and its use as a substitute for pork in cooked sausages. The PA and sodium erythorbate (0.05%) was compared by quantifying hydroperoxides. PFW stabilized with 0.05% PA was used to replace pork (0, 25, 50, and 75% PFW) sausage formulation. All formulations showed a difference in texture in comparison to control, which had higher levels of hydroperoxides. Phytic acid has antioxidant action on PFW, optimized in 0.05%. PFW can substitute up to 25% for pork in cooked sausages.KEYWORDS: Aquaculturefish productmechanically separated meatoxidative stability AcknowledgmentsThe authors are thankful to the financial assistance provided by the Foundation Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) by means of a Master’s degree scholarship, and to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for granting a research productivity scholarship to Professor Leila Picolli da Silva. They are also grateful to the companies Bremil and Ingal Food for supplying antioxidants.Author contributionsLFM: carried out the research, laboratory and statistical analyses; LPS: professor who guided the research and helped in writing the manuscript; TJA: data processing and manuscript writing; ACKK: data processing and manuscript writing; ABBB: assisted in laboratory analyses; CSS: assisted in laboratory analyses; FRGF: assisted in laboratory analyses; NML: assisted in laboratory analyses.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe study design was conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies in Universidad Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil.Data availability statementhttps://doi.org/10.17632/654y68mwpc.1","PeriodicalId":15091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antioxidant Action of Phytic Acid in Processed Fish Waste and Cooked Fish Sausages\",\"authors\":\"Taida Juliana Adorian, Luciane Ferreira de Moura, Ana Carolina Kohlrausch Klinger, Ana Betine Beutinger Bender, Caroline Sefrin Speroni, Fernanda Rodrigues Goulart Ferrigolo, Naglezi DeMenezes Lovatto, Leila Picolli da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10498850.2023.2260825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe study evaluated the efficiency of phytic acid (PA) for stabilization of processed fish waste (PFW – ventral muscle and vertebral column without fins) and its use as a substitute for pork in cooked sausages. The PA and sodium erythorbate (0.05%) was compared by quantifying hydroperoxides. PFW stabilized with 0.05% PA was used to replace pork (0, 25, 50, and 75% PFW) sausage formulation. All formulations showed a difference in texture in comparison to control, which had higher levels of hydroperoxides. Phytic acid has antioxidant action on PFW, optimized in 0.05%. PFW can substitute up to 25% for pork in cooked sausages.KEYWORDS: Aquaculturefish productmechanically separated meatoxidative stability AcknowledgmentsThe authors are thankful to the financial assistance provided by the Foundation Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) by means of a Master’s degree scholarship, and to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for granting a research productivity scholarship to Professor Leila Picolli da Silva. They are also grateful to the companies Bremil and Ingal Food for supplying antioxidants.Author contributionsLFM: carried out the research, laboratory and statistical analyses; LPS: professor who guided the research and helped in writing the manuscript; TJA: data processing and manuscript writing; ACKK: data processing and manuscript writing; ABBB: assisted in laboratory analyses; CSS: assisted in laboratory analyses; FRGF: assisted in laboratory analyses; NML: assisted in laboratory analyses.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe study design was conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies in Universidad Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil.Data availability statementhttps://doi.org/10.17632/654y68mwpc.1\",\"PeriodicalId\":15091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2023.2260825\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2023.2260825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究评价了植酸(PA)对加工鱼废物(PFW -腹肌和无鳍的脊柱)的稳定性及其在熟香肠中替代猪肉的应用。通过对过氧化氢的定量分析,比较了PA和赤藓酸钠(0.05%)的含量。用0.05% PA稳定的PFW代替猪肉(0、25、50、75% PFW)香肠配方。与氢过氧化物含量较高的对照组相比,所有配方的质地都有所不同。植酸对PFW有抗氧化作用,最佳浓度为0.05%。在煮熟的香肠中,PFW可以代替高达25%的猪肉。作者感谢高等教育人员发展协调基金会(CAPES)提供的硕士学位奖学金和国家科学技术发展委员会(CNPq)为Leila Picolli da Silva教授提供的研究生产力奖学金。他们也感谢brremil和Ingal食品公司提供抗氧化剂。slfm:进行研究、实验室和统计分析;LPS:指导研究并帮助撰写手稿的教授;TJA:数据处理和稿件撰写;ACKK:数据处理和稿件撰写;协助实验室分析;CSS:协助实验室分析;FRGF:协助实验室分析;协助实验室分析。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。伦理批准本研究设计是在巴西圣玛丽亚联邦大学所有相关机构的伦理批准下进行的。数据可用性声明://doi.org/10.17632/654y68mwpc.1
Antioxidant Action of Phytic Acid in Processed Fish Waste and Cooked Fish Sausages
ABSTRACTThe study evaluated the efficiency of phytic acid (PA) for stabilization of processed fish waste (PFW – ventral muscle and vertebral column without fins) and its use as a substitute for pork in cooked sausages. The PA and sodium erythorbate (0.05%) was compared by quantifying hydroperoxides. PFW stabilized with 0.05% PA was used to replace pork (0, 25, 50, and 75% PFW) sausage formulation. All formulations showed a difference in texture in comparison to control, which had higher levels of hydroperoxides. Phytic acid has antioxidant action on PFW, optimized in 0.05%. PFW can substitute up to 25% for pork in cooked sausages.KEYWORDS: Aquaculturefish productmechanically separated meatoxidative stability AcknowledgmentsThe authors are thankful to the financial assistance provided by the Foundation Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) by means of a Master’s degree scholarship, and to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for granting a research productivity scholarship to Professor Leila Picolli da Silva. They are also grateful to the companies Bremil and Ingal Food for supplying antioxidants.Author contributionsLFM: carried out the research, laboratory and statistical analyses; LPS: professor who guided the research and helped in writing the manuscript; TJA: data processing and manuscript writing; ACKK: data processing and manuscript writing; ABBB: assisted in laboratory analyses; CSS: assisted in laboratory analyses; FRGF: assisted in laboratory analyses; NML: assisted in laboratory analyses.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe study design was conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies in Universidad Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil.Data availability statementhttps://doi.org/10.17632/654y68mwpc.1
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology publishes research papers, short communications, and review articles concerning the application of science and technology and biotechnology to all aspects of research, innovation, production, and distribution of food products originating from the marine and freshwater bodies of the world. The journal features articles on various aspects of basic and applied science in topics related to:
-harvesting and handling practices-
processing with traditional and new technologies-
refrigeration and freezing-
packaging and storage-
safety and traceability-
byproduct utilization-
consumer attitudes toward aquatic food.
The Journal also covers basic studies of aquatic products as related to food chemistry, microbiology, and engineering, such as all flora and fauna from aquatic environs, including seaweeds and underutilized species used directly for human consumption or alternative uses. Special features in the journal include guest editorials by specialists in their fields and book reviews covering a wide range of topics.