《老板在看:监督决策如何伤害黑人员工

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Costas Cavounidis, Kevin Lang, Russell Weinstein
{"title":"《老板在看:监督决策如何伤害黑人员工","authors":"Costas Cavounidis, Kevin Lang, Russell Weinstein","doi":"10.1093/ej/uead079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract African Americans face shorter employment durations than similar whites. We hypothesise that employers discriminate in acquiring or acting on ability-relevant information. In our model, monitoring black but not white workers is self-sustaining. New black hires were more likely fired by previous employers after monitoring. This reduces firms’ beliefs about ability, incentivizing discriminatory monitoring. We confirm our predictions that layoffs are initially higher for black than non-black workers but that they converge with seniority and decline more with AFQT for black workers. Two additional predictions, lower lifetime incomes and longer unemployment durations for black workers, have known empirical support.","PeriodicalId":48448,"journal":{"name":"Economic Journal","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Boss is Watching: How Monitoring Decisions Hurt Black Workers\",\"authors\":\"Costas Cavounidis, Kevin Lang, Russell Weinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ej/uead079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract African Americans face shorter employment durations than similar whites. We hypothesise that employers discriminate in acquiring or acting on ability-relevant information. In our model, monitoring black but not white workers is self-sustaining. New black hires were more likely fired by previous employers after monitoring. This reduces firms’ beliefs about ability, incentivizing discriminatory monitoring. We confirm our predictions that layoffs are initially higher for black than non-black workers but that they converge with seniority and decline more with AFQT for black workers. Two additional predictions, lower lifetime incomes and longer unemployment durations for black workers, have known empirical support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非裔美国人的就业时间比白人短。我们假设雇主在获取或处理与能力相关的信息时存在歧视。在我们的模型中,监控黑人而非白人员工是自我维持的。新雇佣的黑人更有可能在监督后被前雇主解雇。这降低了公司对能力的信念,激励了歧视性监督。我们证实了我们的预测,即黑人工人的裁员率最初高于非黑人工人,但随着资历的增加,黑人工人的裁员率会下降,而随着AFQT的增加,黑人工人的裁员率会下降得更多。另外两个预测,黑人工人的终生收入较低和失业时间较长,已经得到了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Boss is Watching: How Monitoring Decisions Hurt Black Workers
Abstract African Americans face shorter employment durations than similar whites. We hypothesise that employers discriminate in acquiring or acting on ability-relevant information. In our model, monitoring black but not white workers is self-sustaining. New black hires were more likely fired by previous employers after monitoring. This reduces firms’ beliefs about ability, incentivizing discriminatory monitoring. We confirm our predictions that layoffs are initially higher for black than non-black workers but that they converge with seniority and decline more with AFQT for black workers. Two additional predictions, lower lifetime incomes and longer unemployment durations for black workers, have known empirical support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Journal
Economic Journal ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Economic Journal is the Royal Economic Society''s flagship title, and is one of the founding journals of modern economics. Over the past 125 years the journal has provided a platform for high quality and imaginative economic research, earning a worldwide reputation excellence as a general journal publishing papers in all fields of economics for a broad international readership. It is invaluable to anyone with an active interest in economic issues and is a key source for professional economists in higher education, business, government and the financial sector who want to keep abreast of current thinking in economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信