基于社区和设施的儿童结核病预防治疗服务提供模式下的家庭费用:喀麦隆和乌干达的一项调查

Nyashadzaishe Mafirakureva, Sushant Mukherjee, Boris Tchounga, Daniel Atwine, Boris Tchakounte Youngui, Bob Ssekyanzi, Richard Okello, Simo Leonie, Jennifer Cohn, Martina Casenghi, Anca Vasiliu, Maryline Bonnet, Peter J Dodd
{"title":"基于社区和设施的儿童结核病预防治疗服务提供模式下的家庭费用:喀麦隆和乌干达的一项调查","authors":"Nyashadzaishe Mafirakureva, Sushant Mukherjee, Boris Tchounga, Daniel Atwine, Boris Tchakounte Youngui, Bob Ssekyanzi, Richard Okello, Simo Leonie, Jennifer Cohn, Martina Casenghi, Anca Vasiliu, Maryline Bonnet, Peter J Dodd","doi":"10.29392/001c.88170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) in child household contacts is recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) but limited data has been reported on the costs experienced by households with children receiving TPT. Methods We evaluated the economic impact on households with children receiving TPT within a service-delivery model cluster-randomised controlled trial in Cameroon and Uganda. The intervention included community health worker-led home-based child-contact screening, TPT initiation and monitoring, and referral of children with presumptive tuberculosis or side effects, and was compared with each country’s facility-based standard of care (control). We used a retrospective cross-sectional survey adapted from the WHO Global task force on tuberculosis patient cost surveys. All costs were collected between February 2021 and March 2021 and are presented in 2021 US$. Results The median household costs estimated using the human capital approach were higher in the control arm ($62.96 [interquartile range, IQR; $19.78-239.74] in Cameroon and $35.95 [IQR; $29.03-91.26] in Uganda) compared to the intervention arm ($2.73 [IQR; $2.73-14.18] in Cameroon and $4.55 [IQR; $3.03-6.06] in Uganda). Using a threshold of 20% of annual household income, 15% (95%CI; 5-31%) of households in Cameroon and 14% (95%CI; 4-26%) in Uganda experienced catastrophic costs in the control compared to 3% (95%CI; 1- 8%) in Cameroon and 3% (95%CI; 1-8%) in Uganda in the intervention. Using the output-based approach to estimate income losses increased costs by 14-32% in the control and 13-19% in the intervention across the two countries. The proportion of participants experiencing any dissaving was higher in the control, 53% (95%CI; 36-71%) in Cameroon and 50% (95%CI; 31-69%) in Uganda, compared to 18% (95%CI; 10-29%) in Cameroon and 17% (95%CI; 8-28%) in Uganda in the intervention. Conclusions Households with child contacts initiated on TPT under a facility-based model incur significant costs. Community-based interventions help to reduce these costs but do not eliminate catastrophic expenditures. Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03832023.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household costs incurred under community- and facility-based service-delivery models of tuberculosis preventive therapy for children: a survey in Cameroon and Uganda\",\"authors\":\"Nyashadzaishe Mafirakureva, Sushant Mukherjee, Boris Tchounga, Daniel Atwine, Boris Tchakounte Youngui, Bob Ssekyanzi, Richard Okello, Simo Leonie, Jennifer Cohn, Martina Casenghi, Anca Vasiliu, Maryline Bonnet, Peter J Dodd\",\"doi\":\"10.29392/001c.88170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) in child household contacts is recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) but limited data has been reported on the costs experienced by households with children receiving TPT. Methods We evaluated the economic impact on households with children receiving TPT within a service-delivery model cluster-randomised controlled trial in Cameroon and Uganda. The intervention included community health worker-led home-based child-contact screening, TPT initiation and monitoring, and referral of children with presumptive tuberculosis or side effects, and was compared with each country’s facility-based standard of care (control). We used a retrospective cross-sectional survey adapted from the WHO Global task force on tuberculosis patient cost surveys. All costs were collected between February 2021 and March 2021 and are presented in 2021 US$. Results The median household costs estimated using the human capital approach were higher in the control arm ($62.96 [interquartile range, IQR; $19.78-239.74] in Cameroon and $35.95 [IQR; $29.03-91.26] in Uganda) compared to the intervention arm ($2.73 [IQR; $2.73-14.18] in Cameroon and $4.55 [IQR; $3.03-6.06] in Uganda). Using a threshold of 20% of annual household income, 15% (95%CI; 5-31%) of households in Cameroon and 14% (95%CI; 4-26%) in Uganda experienced catastrophic costs in the control compared to 3% (95%CI; 1- 8%) in Cameroon and 3% (95%CI; 1-8%) in Uganda in the intervention. Using the output-based approach to estimate income losses increased costs by 14-32% in the control and 13-19% in the intervention across the two countries. The proportion of participants experiencing any dissaving was higher in the control, 53% (95%CI; 36-71%) in Cameroon and 50% (95%CI; 31-69%) in Uganda, compared to 18% (95%CI; 10-29%) in Cameroon and 17% (95%CI; 8-28%) in Uganda in the intervention. Conclusions Households with child contacts initiated on TPT under a facility-based model incur significant costs. Community-based interventions help to reduce these costs but do not eliminate catastrophic expenditures. Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03832023.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global health reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global health reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.88170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.88170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议对儿童家庭接触者进行结核病预防治疗,但关于有儿童接受结核病预防治疗的家庭所经历的费用的数据报告有限。我们在喀麦隆和乌干达进行了一项服务提供模式集群随机对照试验,评估了对有儿童接受TPT的家庭的经济影响。干预措施包括社区卫生工作者主导的以家庭为基础的儿童接触者筛查,TPT的启动和监测,以及疑似结核病或副作用儿童的转诊,并与每个国家以设施为基础的护理标准(对照)进行比较。我们采用了一项来自世卫组织结核病患者成本调查全球工作组的回顾性横断面调查。所有费用在2021年2月至2021年3月期间收取,并以2021年美元表示。结果使用人力资本法估算的家庭成本中位数在对照组较高,为62.96美元[四分位数范围,IQR;喀麦隆为19.78-239.74美元,35.95美元[IQR;$29.03-91.26]在乌干达)与干预组相比($2.73 [IQR;喀麦隆为2.73-14.18美元,4.55美元[IQR;$3.03-6.06](乌干达)。使用家庭年收入20%的阈值,15%(95%置信区间;5-31%), 14%(95%置信区间;在乌干达,4-26%的人在控制中遭受了灾难性的损失,而这一比例为3%(95%可信区间;1- 8%)和3%(95%置信区间;1-8%)。使用基于产出的方法来估计两国的收入损失,对照组和干预组的成本分别增加了14-32%和13-19%。经历过任何不储蓄的参与者比例在对照组中更高,53% (95%CI;36% -71%), 50%(95%置信区间;31-69%),而18%(95%置信区间;10-29%), 17%(95%置信区间;8-28%)。结论:在以设施为基础的模式下,与儿童接触的家庭产生了巨大的成本。以社区为基础的干预措施有助于减少这些费用,但不能消除灾难性支出。注册https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03832023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household costs incurred under community- and facility-based service-delivery models of tuberculosis preventive therapy for children: a survey in Cameroon and Uganda
Background Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) in child household contacts is recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) but limited data has been reported on the costs experienced by households with children receiving TPT. Methods We evaluated the economic impact on households with children receiving TPT within a service-delivery model cluster-randomised controlled trial in Cameroon and Uganda. The intervention included community health worker-led home-based child-contact screening, TPT initiation and monitoring, and referral of children with presumptive tuberculosis or side effects, and was compared with each country’s facility-based standard of care (control). We used a retrospective cross-sectional survey adapted from the WHO Global task force on tuberculosis patient cost surveys. All costs were collected between February 2021 and March 2021 and are presented in 2021 US$. Results The median household costs estimated using the human capital approach were higher in the control arm ($62.96 [interquartile range, IQR; $19.78-239.74] in Cameroon and $35.95 [IQR; $29.03-91.26] in Uganda) compared to the intervention arm ($2.73 [IQR; $2.73-14.18] in Cameroon and $4.55 [IQR; $3.03-6.06] in Uganda). Using a threshold of 20% of annual household income, 15% (95%CI; 5-31%) of households in Cameroon and 14% (95%CI; 4-26%) in Uganda experienced catastrophic costs in the control compared to 3% (95%CI; 1- 8%) in Cameroon and 3% (95%CI; 1-8%) in Uganda in the intervention. Using the output-based approach to estimate income losses increased costs by 14-32% in the control and 13-19% in the intervention across the two countries. The proportion of participants experiencing any dissaving was higher in the control, 53% (95%CI; 36-71%) in Cameroon and 50% (95%CI; 31-69%) in Uganda, compared to 18% (95%CI; 10-29%) in Cameroon and 17% (95%CI; 8-28%) in Uganda in the intervention. Conclusions Households with child contacts initiated on TPT under a facility-based model incur significant costs. Community-based interventions help to reduce these costs but do not eliminate catastrophic expenditures. Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03832023.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信