{"title":"美学与艺术心理学的个人视角:生态学上有效的、跨学科的、多样化的方法论","authors":"Eva Specker","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"272 10‐34","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies\",\"authors\":\"Eva Specker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creativity Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"272 10‐34\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creativity Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies
In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.
期刊介绍:
Creativity Research Journal publishes high-quality, scholarly research capturing the full range of approaches to the study of creativity--behavioral, clinical, cognitive, crosscultural, developmental, educational, genetic, organizational, psychoanalytic, psychometrics, and social. Interdisciplinary research is also published, as is research within specific domains (e.g., art, science) and research on critical issues (e.g., aesthetics, genius, imagery, imagination, incubation, insight, intuition, metaphor, play, problem finding and solving). Integrative literature reviews and theoretical pieces that appreciate empirical work are extremely welcome, but purely speculative articles are not published. Readers are encouraged to send commentaries, comments, and evaluative book reviews.