离线强化学习中自然随机策略的有效评价

IF 2.4 2区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Biometrika Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1093/biomet/asad059
Nathan Kallus, Masatoshi Uehara
{"title":"离线强化学习中自然随机策略的有效评价","authors":"Nathan Kallus, Masatoshi Uehara","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asad059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the efficient off-policy evaluation of natural stochastic policies, which are defined in terms of deviations from the behavior policy. This is a departure from the literature on off-policy evaluation where most work consider the evaluation of explicitly specified policies. Crucially, offline reinforcement learning with natural stochastic policies can help alleviate issues of weak overlap, lead to policies that build upon current practice, and improve policies' implementability in practice. Compared with the classic case of a pre-specified evaluation policy, when evaluating natural stochastic policies, the efficiency bound, which measures the best-achievable estimation error, is inflated since the evaluation policy itself is unknown. In this paper, we derive the efficiency bounds of two major types of natural stochastic policies: tilting policies and modified treatment policies. We then propose efficient nonparametric estimators that attain the efficiency bounds under very lax conditions. These also enjoy a (partial) double robustness property.","PeriodicalId":9001,"journal":{"name":"Biometrika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient Evaluation of Natural Stochastic Policies in Offline Reinforcement Learning\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Kallus, Masatoshi Uehara\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomet/asad059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the efficient off-policy evaluation of natural stochastic policies, which are defined in terms of deviations from the behavior policy. This is a departure from the literature on off-policy evaluation where most work consider the evaluation of explicitly specified policies. Crucially, offline reinforcement learning with natural stochastic policies can help alleviate issues of weak overlap, lead to policies that build upon current practice, and improve policies' implementability in practice. Compared with the classic case of a pre-specified evaluation policy, when evaluating natural stochastic policies, the efficiency bound, which measures the best-achievable estimation error, is inflated since the evaluation policy itself is unknown. In this paper, we derive the efficiency bounds of two major types of natural stochastic policies: tilting policies and modified treatment policies. We then propose efficient nonparametric estimators that attain the efficiency bounds under very lax conditions. These also enjoy a (partial) double robustness property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asad059\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asad059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们研究了自然随机策略的有效离政策评估,自然随机策略是根据偏离行为策略来定义的。这与非政策评估的文献不同,在非政策评估中,大多数工作都考虑对明确规定的政策进行评估。至关重要的是,使用自然随机策略的离线强化学习可以帮助缓解弱重叠问题,产生基于当前实践的策略,并提高策略在实践中的可实施性。与经典的预先设定评估策略相比,在评估自然随机策略时,由于评估策略本身是未知的,衡量最佳可实现估计误差的效率界被夸大了。本文导出了两大类自然随机策略的效率界:倾斜策略和修正处理策略。然后我们提出有效的非参数估计,在非常宽松的条件下达到效率界。它们还具有(部分)双重鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient Evaluation of Natural Stochastic Policies in Offline Reinforcement Learning
We study the efficient off-policy evaluation of natural stochastic policies, which are defined in terms of deviations from the behavior policy. This is a departure from the literature on off-policy evaluation where most work consider the evaluation of explicitly specified policies. Crucially, offline reinforcement learning with natural stochastic policies can help alleviate issues of weak overlap, lead to policies that build upon current practice, and improve policies' implementability in practice. Compared with the classic case of a pre-specified evaluation policy, when evaluating natural stochastic policies, the efficiency bound, which measures the best-achievable estimation error, is inflated since the evaluation policy itself is unknown. In this paper, we derive the efficiency bounds of two major types of natural stochastic policies: tilting policies and modified treatment policies. We then propose efficient nonparametric estimators that attain the efficiency bounds under very lax conditions. These also enjoy a (partial) double robustness property.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrika
Biometrika 生物-生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrika is primarily a journal of statistics in which emphasis is placed on papers containing original theoretical contributions of direct or potential value in applications. From time to time, papers in bordering fields are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信