纳入和过度纳入的影响:对治疗问题的解释

IF 1.8 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Social Influence Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1080/15534510.2023.2270199

Megan K. McCarty, Nicole E. Iannone, Janice R. Kelly

{"title":"纳入和过度纳入的影响:对治疗问题的解释","authors":"Megan K. McCarty, Nicole E. Iannone, Janice R. Kelly","doi":"10.1080/15534510.2023.2270199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current work quantitatively explored whether the explanation for overinclusion moderates its effect. In Study 1, female participants were excluded, included, or overincluded in a virtual ball-tossing game and given reason to believe this treatment was due to their gender or not. In Study 2, female participants imagined a scenario in which they were included or overincluded due to their gender or not. The effect of inclusion versus overinclusion on participants’ need satisfaction was significantly moderated by the explanation for this treatment in both studies. This work suggests that including or even overincluding members of traditionally underrepresented groups is not sufficient for members of these communities to have positive group experiences; the explanations they have for their treatment matters.","PeriodicalId":46580,"journal":{"name":"Social Influence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of inclusion and overinclusion: explanations for treatment matter\",\"authors\":\"Megan K. McCarty, Nicole E. Iannone, Janice R. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15534510.2023.2270199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current work quantitatively explored whether the explanation for overinclusion moderates its effect. In Study 1, female participants were excluded, included, or overincluded in a virtual ball-tossing game and given reason to believe this treatment was due to their gender or not. In Study 2, female participants imagined a scenario in which they were included or overincluded due to their gender or not. The effect of inclusion versus overinclusion on participants’ need satisfaction was significantly moderated by the explanation for this treatment in both studies. This work suggests that including or even overincluding members of traditionally underrepresented groups is not sufficient for members of these communities to have positive group experiences; the explanations they have for their treatment matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Influence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Influence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2023.2270199\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Influence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2023.2270199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的工作定量地探讨了过度包容的解释是否会调节其影响。在研究1中，女性参与者被排除、包括或过多地包括在虚拟投球游戏中，并有理由相信这种治疗是由于她们的性别或不是。在研究2中，女性参与者想象一个场景，在这个场景中，由于她们的性别，她们被包括在内或被过度包括在内。纳入与过度纳入对参与者需求满意度的影响在两项研究中都被对这种治疗的解释显著调节。这项工作表明，包括甚至过度包括传统上代表性不足的群体的成员不足以使这些社区的成员拥有积极的群体体验;他们对治疗的解释很重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The effects of inclusion and overinclusion: explanations for treatment matter

The current work quantitatively explored whether the explanation for overinclusion moderates its effect. In Study 1, female participants were excluded, included, or overincluded in a virtual ball-tossing game and given reason to believe this treatment was due to their gender or not. In Study 2, female participants imagined a scenario in which they were included or overincluded due to their gender or not. The effect of inclusion versus overinclusion on participants’ need satisfaction was significantly moderated by the explanation for this treatment in both studies. This work suggests that including or even overincluding members of traditionally underrepresented groups is not sufficient for members of these communities to have positive group experiences; the explanations they have for their treatment matters.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Influence PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Influence is a journal that provides an integrated focus for research into this important, dynamic, and multi-disciplinary field. Topics covered include: conformity, norms, social influence tactics such as norm of reciprocity, authority, scarcity, interpersonal influence, persuasion, power, advertising, mass media effects, political persuasion, propaganda, comparative influence, compliance, minority influence, influence in groups, cultic influence, social movements, social contagions, rumors, resistance to influence, influence across cultures, and the history of influence research.