{"title":"可持续发展是一个棘手的问题:巴西亚马逊地区的案例","authors":"Marcelo Machado, Aline Rocha, Natalia Tartarotti","doi":"10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global importance of the Amazon rainforest is abundantly evident. It is the world’s largest tropical rainforest, home to incredible biodiversity, and arguably an essential part of the earth’s already fragile climate system. Exploiting the Amazon beyond planetary boundaries, in other words, beyond a threshold the forest cannot regenerate itself from, may have catastrophic, global impacts. Conversely, Brazil is an industrialized yet developing country far from realizing its potential to become an economic superpower. To this day, millions of Brazilians still live below the poverty line. Hence, Brazil cannot afford to ignore the economic potential of the Amazon’s vast resources. The issue becomes how to use those resources effectively and efficiently for economic development. The key is perhaps a sustainable development approach. Considering the diversity of internal (i.e., Brazilian) and external (i.e., foreign) stakeholders, there is no agreement of what sustainable development would mean when it comes to the Brazilian Amazon Region (BAR). The challenge is the fact that environmental and social problems are not just complex problems. According to Brown et al (2010), they are very hard to properly define. Buchanan (1992) concluded these types of problems do not fit within any specific subject matter. In this research, we propose the sustainable development of the BAR as a wicked problem (Rittel and Webber, 1973). The main purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of stakeholders to confirm this hypothesis. This study employs systems thinking, specifically Peter Checkland’s (1989) Soft System Methodology as the conceptual foundation of the analysis of evidence from the field. Preliminary findings are summarized, and conclusions with conceptual and practical considerations are provided. Limitations and opportunities for future studies are also included.
 Keywords: sustainable development, wicked problems, Brazilian Amazon, system thinking, soft system methodology.","PeriodicalId":46519,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sustainable Development","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable Development as a Wicked Problem: The Case of the Brazilian Amazon Region\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Machado, Aline Rocha, Natalia Tartarotti\",\"doi\":\"10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global importance of the Amazon rainforest is abundantly evident. It is the world’s largest tropical rainforest, home to incredible biodiversity, and arguably an essential part of the earth’s already fragile climate system. Exploiting the Amazon beyond planetary boundaries, in other words, beyond a threshold the forest cannot regenerate itself from, may have catastrophic, global impacts. Conversely, Brazil is an industrialized yet developing country far from realizing its potential to become an economic superpower. To this day, millions of Brazilians still live below the poverty line. Hence, Brazil cannot afford to ignore the economic potential of the Amazon’s vast resources. The issue becomes how to use those resources effectively and efficiently for economic development. The key is perhaps a sustainable development approach. Considering the diversity of internal (i.e., Brazilian) and external (i.e., foreign) stakeholders, there is no agreement of what sustainable development would mean when it comes to the Brazilian Amazon Region (BAR). The challenge is the fact that environmental and social problems are not just complex problems. According to Brown et al (2010), they are very hard to properly define. Buchanan (1992) concluded these types of problems do not fit within any specific subject matter. In this research, we propose the sustainable development of the BAR as a wicked problem (Rittel and Webber, 1973). The main purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of stakeholders to confirm this hypothesis. This study employs systems thinking, specifically Peter Checkland’s (1989) Soft System Methodology as the conceptual foundation of the analysis of evidence from the field. Preliminary findings are summarized, and conclusions with conceptual and practical considerations are provided. Limitations and opportunities for future studies are also included.
 Keywords: sustainable development, wicked problems, Brazilian Amazon, system thinking, soft system methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
亚马逊雨林在全球的重要性是显而易见的。它是世界上最大的热带雨林,拥有令人难以置信的生物多样性,可以说是地球已经脆弱的气候系统的重要组成部分。开发亚马逊雨林超过地球边界,换句话说,超过森林无法再生的阈值,可能会产生灾难性的全球影响。相反,巴西是一个工业化的发展中国家,远未实现其成为经济超级大国的潜力。直到今天,仍有数百万巴西人生活在贫困线以下。因此,巴西不能忽视亚马逊地区丰富资源的经济潜力。问题是如何有效和高效地利用这些资源促进经济发展。关键也许是可持续发展的方法。考虑到内部(即巴西)和外部(即外国)利益相关者的多样性,对于巴西亚马逊地区(BAR)的可持续发展意味着什么,人们没有达成一致意见。挑战在于环境和社会问题不仅仅是复杂的问题。根据Brown等人(2010)的说法,它们很难被恰当地定义。布坎南(1992)得出结论,这些类型的问题不适合任何特定的主题。在本研究中,我们提出BAR的可持续发展是一个邪恶的问题(Rittel and Webber, 1973)。本研究的主要目的是对利益相关者进行分析,以证实这一假设。本研究采用系统思维,特别是Peter Checkland(1989)的软系统方法论(Soft System Methodology)作为实地证据分析的概念基础。总结了初步发现,并提出了概念和实际考虑的结论。还包括未来研究的局限性和机会。
关键词:可持续发展,邪恶问题,巴西亚马逊,系统思维,软系统方法论。
Sustainable Development as a Wicked Problem: The Case of the Brazilian Amazon Region
The global importance of the Amazon rainforest is abundantly evident. It is the world’s largest tropical rainforest, home to incredible biodiversity, and arguably an essential part of the earth’s already fragile climate system. Exploiting the Amazon beyond planetary boundaries, in other words, beyond a threshold the forest cannot regenerate itself from, may have catastrophic, global impacts. Conversely, Brazil is an industrialized yet developing country far from realizing its potential to become an economic superpower. To this day, millions of Brazilians still live below the poverty line. Hence, Brazil cannot afford to ignore the economic potential of the Amazon’s vast resources. The issue becomes how to use those resources effectively and efficiently for economic development. The key is perhaps a sustainable development approach. Considering the diversity of internal (i.e., Brazilian) and external (i.e., foreign) stakeholders, there is no agreement of what sustainable development would mean when it comes to the Brazilian Amazon Region (BAR). The challenge is the fact that environmental and social problems are not just complex problems. According to Brown et al (2010), they are very hard to properly define. Buchanan (1992) concluded these types of problems do not fit within any specific subject matter. In this research, we propose the sustainable development of the BAR as a wicked problem (Rittel and Webber, 1973). The main purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of stakeholders to confirm this hypothesis. This study employs systems thinking, specifically Peter Checkland’s (1989) Soft System Methodology as the conceptual foundation of the analysis of evidence from the field. Preliminary findings are summarized, and conclusions with conceptual and practical considerations are provided. Limitations and opportunities for future studies are also included.
Keywords: sustainable development, wicked problems, Brazilian Amazon, system thinking, soft system methodology.