{"title":"臭氧(o3)和真空紫外(VUV)去除微囊藻毒素:氯离子的影响","authors":"Fatima AlAfifi, Saad Jasim, Madjid Mohseni","doi":"10.1080/01919512.2023.2264339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRemoval of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) by ozone (O3), vacuum-UV (VUV), and their combination was investigated in the presence of chloride as one of the main solutes present in water. In general, the combined VUV/O3 process provided the greatest MC-LR removal, with the presence of chloride enhancing the removal efficacy. Formation of chlorine radical species was the primary reason for the observed improvement. The order of MC-LR removal by different processes using UV fluence of around 300 mJ cm−2, ozone dose of 0.1 mg L−1, and chloride concentration of 120 mg L−1 was as follows: VUV/O3/Chloride > VUV/O3 > VUV/Chloride > VUV > O3. Comparing MC-LR removal by O3, VUV and VUV/O3 in synthetic lab samples, spiked with Suwannee River NOM and natural water samples of the same organic concentration, showed the significance of background organics in scavenging ozone in the process. For a given ozone dosage, MC-LR removal by O3 or VUV/O3 in natural water was lower than that in the synthetic water samples. The standalone VUV was not affected and the MC-LR removals were identical in both synthetic and natural waters.KEYWORDS: Advanced oxidationchloride enhancementmicrocystin-LR degradationOzoneSuwannee River NOMvacuum ultraviolet AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) while the experiments were conducted in the laboratories of the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. Many thanks to Mr. Kevin Brown from Metro Vancouver for providing water samples from Capilano Watershed.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund.","PeriodicalId":19580,"journal":{"name":"Ozone: Science & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microcystin-LR Removal by Ozone (O <sub>3</sub> ) and Vacuum-UV (VUV): The Effect of Chloride Ions\",\"authors\":\"Fatima AlAfifi, Saad Jasim, Madjid Mohseni\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01919512.2023.2264339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTRemoval of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) by ozone (O3), vacuum-UV (VUV), and their combination was investigated in the presence of chloride as one of the main solutes present in water. In general, the combined VUV/O3 process provided the greatest MC-LR removal, with the presence of chloride enhancing the removal efficacy. Formation of chlorine radical species was the primary reason for the observed improvement. The order of MC-LR removal by different processes using UV fluence of around 300 mJ cm−2, ozone dose of 0.1 mg L−1, and chloride concentration of 120 mg L−1 was as follows: VUV/O3/Chloride > VUV/O3 > VUV/Chloride > VUV > O3. Comparing MC-LR removal by O3, VUV and VUV/O3 in synthetic lab samples, spiked with Suwannee River NOM and natural water samples of the same organic concentration, showed the significance of background organics in scavenging ozone in the process. For a given ozone dosage, MC-LR removal by O3 or VUV/O3 in natural water was lower than that in the synthetic water samples. The standalone VUV was not affected and the MC-LR removals were identical in both synthetic and natural waters.KEYWORDS: Advanced oxidationchloride enhancementmicrocystin-LR degradationOzoneSuwannee River NOMvacuum ultraviolet AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) while the experiments were conducted in the laboratories of the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. Many thanks to Mr. Kevin Brown from Metro Vancouver for providing water samples from Capilano Watershed.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ozone: Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ozone: Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2023.2264339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ozone: Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2023.2264339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microcystin-LR Removal by Ozone (O 3 ) and Vacuum-UV (VUV): The Effect of Chloride Ions
ABSTRACTRemoval of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) by ozone (O3), vacuum-UV (VUV), and their combination was investigated in the presence of chloride as one of the main solutes present in water. In general, the combined VUV/O3 process provided the greatest MC-LR removal, with the presence of chloride enhancing the removal efficacy. Formation of chlorine radical species was the primary reason for the observed improvement. The order of MC-LR removal by different processes using UV fluence of around 300 mJ cm−2, ozone dose of 0.1 mg L−1, and chloride concentration of 120 mg L−1 was as follows: VUV/O3/Chloride > VUV/O3 > VUV/Chloride > VUV > O3. Comparing MC-LR removal by O3, VUV and VUV/O3 in synthetic lab samples, spiked with Suwannee River NOM and natural water samples of the same organic concentration, showed the significance of background organics in scavenging ozone in the process. For a given ozone dosage, MC-LR removal by O3 or VUV/O3 in natural water was lower than that in the synthetic water samples. The standalone VUV was not affected and the MC-LR removals were identical in both synthetic and natural waters.KEYWORDS: Advanced oxidationchloride enhancementmicrocystin-LR degradationOzoneSuwannee River NOMvacuum ultraviolet AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) while the experiments were conducted in the laboratories of the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. Many thanks to Mr. Kevin Brown from Metro Vancouver for providing water samples from Capilano Watershed.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Qatar National Research Fund.
期刊介绍:
The only journal in the world that focuses on the technologies of ozone and related oxidation technologies, Ozone: Science and Engineering brings you quality original research, review papers, research notes, and case histories in each issue. Get the most up-to date results of basic, applied, and engineered research including:
-Ozone generation and contacting-
Treatment of drinking water-
Analysis of ozone in gases and liquids-
Treatment of wastewater and hazardous waste-
Advanced oxidation processes-
Treatment of emerging contaminants-
Agri-Food applications-
Process control of ozone systems-
New applications for ozone (e.g. laundry applications, semiconductor applications)-
Chemical synthesis.
All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.