{"title":"《聚集的时间:档案与犹太文化的控制》作者:杰森·勒斯蒂格","authors":"Ari Joskowicz","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture by Jason Lustig Ari Joskowicz Jason Lustig. A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 280 pp. The publication of Jason Lustig’s book A Time to Gather makes clear that Jewish studies is finally experiencing its own archival turn. Building on the [End Page 478] momentum generated by other recent works in the field, Lustig’s book marks a new stage in this scholarship, with its sweeping analysis of Jewish efforts to build monumental document collections during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. An intellectual and cultural history of some of the largest Jewish archival repositories in Germany, Israel, and the United States, Lustig’s volume demonstrates how the archives that scholars consult to unearth sources about the ideas and ideologies animating modern Jewish life are themselves an expression of these very same impulses. Lustig’s central contention is that the Jewish archives he studies were engaged in a shared project that also pushed them into competition with one another, as each developed ambitions of total collecting. The first chapter charts the origin story of that modern ambition by covering the establishment of the Gesamtarchiv der deutschen Juden, which the German Federation of Jewish Communities founded in 1903 to bring together the collections of Jewish institutions across the German Empire. Mirroring German nationalist understandings of the unified history of German territory, these collections sought to centralize communal documents produced across the new empire. Focusing on this geographic and territorial ambition, Lustig carefully reconstructs the thinking and ideologies behind the Gesamtarchiv’s and later archives’ efforts to gather in one institution traditional forms of written documentation of Jewish history. These aspirations were front and center in the efforts of the Jewish Historical General Archives in Jerusalem, the subject of the second chapter. Mirroring the larger project of a Zionist ingathering of exiles, the General Archives aimed to reproduce that mission for a wider range of historical records. Archivists and administrators shaped by the German tradition sought to create an even grander version of a total archive that would bring the documentary traces of Jewish life from Jews around the world to Jerusalem. Its later name, the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People, underlines this claim. Founded at the dawn of a new age in archival technology, the Central Archives engaged in a massive project of microfilming whenever physical documents proved difficult to acquire. The American Jewish Archives, the focus of chapter 3, represent a concurrent post-Holocaust effort in the United States. Under the visionary leadership of Jacob Rader Marcus, the archive developed a hemispheric vision of collecting in the Americas. It also emphasized the role that decentralized copying of material would have for the production of historical knowledge. In fact, Marcus frequently claimed that he preferred copies to originals. Such an approach was fundamentally different from the desire of postwar German cities to retain original documents of decimated or extinguished communities, the subject of chapter 4. In this chapter, Lustig traces several contentious debates surrounding these materials, including those triggered by the failed attempts of a select group of non-Jewish and Jewish activists to keep Jewish archives in Worms and Hamburg. Overall, the General Archives in Jerusalem were successful in these conflicts, removing most communal archives to Israel and, later, undermining attempts to build a competing central archive of original or microfilmed copies in Germany. Chapter 5 examines efforts to create digital archives out of dispersed collections that had never been unified in this form physically. Driven by new funding [End Page 479] needs and opportunities, as well as aspirations to yield new technologies for large-scale endeavors of conservation, the foundation of the Center for Jewish History in New York, YIVO’s Vilna collections, and the project to unite fragments of the Cairo Geniza brought together disparate sets of collections under a single virtual roof. This last chapter is a fitting and remarkable conclusion to Lustig’s tightly argued survey of the total collecting efforts of different modern Jewish institutions. It beautifully demonstrates how impulses to combine documents in single repositories create...","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"21 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture by Jason Lustig (review)\",\"authors\":\"Ari Joskowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture by Jason Lustig Ari Joskowicz Jason Lustig. A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 280 pp. The publication of Jason Lustig’s book A Time to Gather makes clear that Jewish studies is finally experiencing its own archival turn. Building on the [End Page 478] momentum generated by other recent works in the field, Lustig’s book marks a new stage in this scholarship, with its sweeping analysis of Jewish efforts to build monumental document collections during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. An intellectual and cultural history of some of the largest Jewish archival repositories in Germany, Israel, and the United States, Lustig’s volume demonstrates how the archives that scholars consult to unearth sources about the ideas and ideologies animating modern Jewish life are themselves an expression of these very same impulses. Lustig’s central contention is that the Jewish archives he studies were engaged in a shared project that also pushed them into competition with one another, as each developed ambitions of total collecting. The first chapter charts the origin story of that modern ambition by covering the establishment of the Gesamtarchiv der deutschen Juden, which the German Federation of Jewish Communities founded in 1903 to bring together the collections of Jewish institutions across the German Empire. Mirroring German nationalist understandings of the unified history of German territory, these collections sought to centralize communal documents produced across the new empire. Focusing on this geographic and territorial ambition, Lustig carefully reconstructs the thinking and ideologies behind the Gesamtarchiv’s and later archives’ efforts to gather in one institution traditional forms of written documentation of Jewish history. These aspirations were front and center in the efforts of the Jewish Historical General Archives in Jerusalem, the subject of the second chapter. Mirroring the larger project of a Zionist ingathering of exiles, the General Archives aimed to reproduce that mission for a wider range of historical records. Archivists and administrators shaped by the German tradition sought to create an even grander version of a total archive that would bring the documentary traces of Jewish life from Jews around the world to Jerusalem. Its later name, the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People, underlines this claim. Founded at the dawn of a new age in archival technology, the Central Archives engaged in a massive project of microfilming whenever physical documents proved difficult to acquire. The American Jewish Archives, the focus of chapter 3, represent a concurrent post-Holocaust effort in the United States. Under the visionary leadership of Jacob Rader Marcus, the archive developed a hemispheric vision of collecting in the Americas. It also emphasized the role that decentralized copying of material would have for the production of historical knowledge. In fact, Marcus frequently claimed that he preferred copies to originals. Such an approach was fundamentally different from the desire of postwar German cities to retain original documents of decimated or extinguished communities, the subject of chapter 4. In this chapter, Lustig traces several contentious debates surrounding these materials, including those triggered by the failed attempts of a select group of non-Jewish and Jewish activists to keep Jewish archives in Worms and Hamburg. Overall, the General Archives in Jerusalem were successful in these conflicts, removing most communal archives to Israel and, later, undermining attempts to build a competing central archive of original or microfilmed copies in Germany. Chapter 5 examines efforts to create digital archives out of dispersed collections that had never been unified in this form physically. Driven by new funding [End Page 479] needs and opportunities, as well as aspirations to yield new technologies for large-scale endeavors of conservation, the foundation of the Center for Jewish History in New York, YIVO’s Vilna collections, and the project to unite fragments of the Cairo Geniza brought together disparate sets of collections under a single virtual roof. This last chapter is a fitting and remarkable conclusion to Lustig’s tightly argued survey of the total collecting efforts of different modern Jewish institutions. It beautifully demonstrates how impulses to combine documents in single repositories create...\",\"PeriodicalId\":54106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies\",\"volume\":\"21 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911545\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
书评:《收集的时间:档案与对犹太文化的控制》作者:杰森·勒斯蒂格《聚集的时刻:档案与犹太文化的控制》。纽约:牛津大学出版社,2022。贾森·勒斯蒂格(Jason Lustig)的著作《聚会的时刻》(A Time to Gather)的出版清楚地表明,犹太研究终于经历了自己的档案转折。在该领域其他近期作品所产生的势头的基础上,勒斯蒂格的书标志着这一学术研究进入了一个新阶段,它全面分析了犹太人在20世纪和21世纪建立纪念性文献收藏的努力。在德国、以色列和美国的一些最大的犹太档案库的知识和文化史上,勒斯蒂格的卷展示了学者们如何查阅档案,以发掘有关现代犹太人生活的思想和意识形态的来源,这些档案本身就是这些相同冲动的表达。勒斯蒂格的核心论点是,他所研究的犹太档案都参与了一个共同的项目,也使他们彼此竞争,因为每个人都有全面收集的野心。第一章通过介绍Gesamtarchiv der deutschen Juden的建立,描绘了这一现代野心的起源故事。Gesamtarchiv der deutschen Juden是德国犹太社区联合会(German Federation of Jewish Communities)于1903年成立的,旨在汇集德意志帝国各地犹太机构的藏品。这些收藏反映了德国民族主义者对德国领土统一历史的理解,试图将整个新帝国产生的公共文件集中起来。专注于这种地理和领土野心,Lustig仔细地重建了Gesamtarchiv和后来的档案努力背后的思想和意识形态,这些努力是为了将传统形式的犹太历史书面文件收集在一个机构中。这些愿望是位于耶路撒冷的犹太历史总档案馆(第二章的主题)努力的首要和中心。作为犹太复国主义者聚集流亡者的更大项目的反映,总档案馆旨在为更广泛的历史记录重现这一使命。受德国传统影响的档案保管员和管理人员试图创建一个更宏伟的完整档案,将世界各地犹太人生活的记录痕迹带到耶路撒冷。它后来的名字,犹太民族历史中央档案馆,强调了这一说法。中央档案馆成立于档案技术新时代的黎明,每当实体文件难以获得时,它就会进行大规模的缩微拍摄项目。第三章的重点是美国犹太人档案,它代表了美国大屠杀后的同时努力。在雅各布·雷德·马库斯富有远见的领导下,档案馆发展了美洲半球的收藏愿景。它还强调了材料的分散复制对历史知识生产的作用。事实上,马库斯经常声称他更喜欢复制品而不是原件。这种方法与战后德国城市希望保留被摧毁或灭绝社区的原始文件(第四章的主题)的愿望有着根本的不同。在本章中,勒斯蒂格追溯了围绕这些材料的几次有争议的辩论,包括由一群精选的非犹太人和犹太活动家在沃尔姆斯和汉堡保存犹太档案的失败尝试引发的辩论。总的来说,耶路撒冷的总档案馆在这些冲突中取得了成功,将大多数公共档案转移到以色列,后来又破坏了在德国建立一个与之竞争的原始或缩微拷贝中央档案馆的企图。第5章考察了从从未以这种形式统一过的分散收藏中创建数字档案的努力。在新的资金(End Page 479)需求和机会的推动下,以及为大规模保护工作提供新技术的愿望,纽约犹太历史中心的成立,YIVO的维尔纳收藏品,以及将开罗Geniza的碎片整合在一起的项目将不同的收藏品集合在一个虚拟的屋顶下。这最后一章是勒斯蒂格对不同现代犹太机构的全部收集努力进行的严密论证的调查的一个恰当而显著的结论。它很好地展示了在单个存储库中组合文档的冲动如何创建…
A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture by Jason Lustig (review)
Reviewed by: A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture by Jason Lustig Ari Joskowicz Jason Lustig. A Time to Gather: Archives and the Control of Jewish Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 280 pp. The publication of Jason Lustig’s book A Time to Gather makes clear that Jewish studies is finally experiencing its own archival turn. Building on the [End Page 478] momentum generated by other recent works in the field, Lustig’s book marks a new stage in this scholarship, with its sweeping analysis of Jewish efforts to build monumental document collections during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. An intellectual and cultural history of some of the largest Jewish archival repositories in Germany, Israel, and the United States, Lustig’s volume demonstrates how the archives that scholars consult to unearth sources about the ideas and ideologies animating modern Jewish life are themselves an expression of these very same impulses. Lustig’s central contention is that the Jewish archives he studies were engaged in a shared project that also pushed them into competition with one another, as each developed ambitions of total collecting. The first chapter charts the origin story of that modern ambition by covering the establishment of the Gesamtarchiv der deutschen Juden, which the German Federation of Jewish Communities founded in 1903 to bring together the collections of Jewish institutions across the German Empire. Mirroring German nationalist understandings of the unified history of German territory, these collections sought to centralize communal documents produced across the new empire. Focusing on this geographic and territorial ambition, Lustig carefully reconstructs the thinking and ideologies behind the Gesamtarchiv’s and later archives’ efforts to gather in one institution traditional forms of written documentation of Jewish history. These aspirations were front and center in the efforts of the Jewish Historical General Archives in Jerusalem, the subject of the second chapter. Mirroring the larger project of a Zionist ingathering of exiles, the General Archives aimed to reproduce that mission for a wider range of historical records. Archivists and administrators shaped by the German tradition sought to create an even grander version of a total archive that would bring the documentary traces of Jewish life from Jews around the world to Jerusalem. Its later name, the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People, underlines this claim. Founded at the dawn of a new age in archival technology, the Central Archives engaged in a massive project of microfilming whenever physical documents proved difficult to acquire. The American Jewish Archives, the focus of chapter 3, represent a concurrent post-Holocaust effort in the United States. Under the visionary leadership of Jacob Rader Marcus, the archive developed a hemispheric vision of collecting in the Americas. It also emphasized the role that decentralized copying of material would have for the production of historical knowledge. In fact, Marcus frequently claimed that he preferred copies to originals. Such an approach was fundamentally different from the desire of postwar German cities to retain original documents of decimated or extinguished communities, the subject of chapter 4. In this chapter, Lustig traces several contentious debates surrounding these materials, including those triggered by the failed attempts of a select group of non-Jewish and Jewish activists to keep Jewish archives in Worms and Hamburg. Overall, the General Archives in Jerusalem were successful in these conflicts, removing most communal archives to Israel and, later, undermining attempts to build a competing central archive of original or microfilmed copies in Germany. Chapter 5 examines efforts to create digital archives out of dispersed collections that had never been unified in this form physically. Driven by new funding [End Page 479] needs and opportunities, as well as aspirations to yield new technologies for large-scale endeavors of conservation, the foundation of the Center for Jewish History in New York, YIVO’s Vilna collections, and the project to unite fragments of the Cairo Geniza brought together disparate sets of collections under a single virtual roof. This last chapter is a fitting and remarkable conclusion to Lustig’s tightly argued survey of the total collecting efforts of different modern Jewish institutions. It beautifully demonstrates how impulses to combine documents in single repositories create...