《萧伯纳与现代爱尔兰的形成》,奥黛丽·麦克纳马拉、纳尔逊·奥齐莱·里切尔主编(书评)

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"《萧伯纳与现代爱尔兰的形成》,奥黛丽·麦克纳马拉、纳尔逊·奥齐莱·里切尔主编(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland ed. by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel Susan Harris (bio) Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland, edited by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel; pp. xxvi + 274. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, $119.99, $89.00 ebook. One of the consequences of what Declan Kiberd has famously called the worlding of Irish Studies has been a shift in the field's conception of who the major Irish modernists are. Widening the scope from nationalism to internationalism has created more room in the Irish canon for modern writers whose relationship to the Irish revival and/or Irish nationalism was antagonistic, tangential, or ambivalent. Figures like Oscar Wilde and Samuel Beckett—Irish-born, Irish-educated writers whose careers unfolded outside of Ireland and whose work does not overtly engage Ireland—have moved in from the margins. Somewhat belatedly, George Bernard Shaw is making that journey. In the twenty-first century, Shaw's work is getting renewed critical attention. The past decade has produced new single-author studies like Matthew Yde's Bernard Shaw and Totalitarianism: Longing for Utopia (2013) and Steven Watt's Bernard Shaw's Fiction, Material Psychology, and Affect: Shaw, Freud, Simmel (2018). Shaw has also figured in a number of new investigations of the origins of modern drama in English, including David Kornhaber's The Birth of Theater from the Spirit of Philosophy: Nietzsche and the Modern Drama (2016), Patrick Bixby's Nietzsche and Irish Modernism (2022), and my own Irish Drama and the Other Revolutions: Playwrights, Sexual Politics and the International Left, 1892–1964 (2017). With Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland, Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel seek to establish Shaw as a major Irish modernist. Lamenting that Shaw \"remained outside the realms of Irish studies until … 2010\" (2), McNamara and Ritschel have assembled a group of essays that seek to \"demonstrat[e] how influential a figure he was in the ongoing debate and movement toward Irish independence\" and [End Page 342] \"highligh[t] the international vision Shaw had for a modernizing Ireland\" (5). The collection appears to have been inspired by the International Shaw Society's 2012 meeting in Dublin and includes the address given at that conference by Irish President Michael D. Higgins. The collection is part of Palgrave's series \"Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries,\" which was launched in 2016 with David Clare's Bernard Shaw's Irish Outlook, and which now boasts over twenty titles. Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland is shaped by a tension between two different impulses legible in its introduction. Connecting Shaw to the Irish revival, on the one hand, is for some of these authors part of a larger attempt to reconceive that revival as international and cosmopolitan rather than nationalist and insular. On the other hand, there also seems to be a concern to insert Shaw into a conception of Irish modernism which is more strictly defined by Irish nationalism and its preoccupations. Collectively, these chapters expand our understanding of Shaw's biographical, historical, and political context in welcome and generative ways. Several chapters zoom in on an important and under-discussed period of Abbey Theater history: the years between the beginning of the Irish revolutionary period (the great Dublin Lockout of 1913) and the emergence of Lennox Robinson as the next long-term Abbey director in the early 1920s. It was during this decade of turbulence—when directors cycled through the Abbey almost on a yearly basis, often departing under a cloud—that Shaw's plays finally took over the Dublin stage, as they had long dominated serious drama in London. Anthony Roche's investigation of this period makes a persuasive case for considering Joseph Augustus Keough's 1916–17 Shavian season at the Abbey an important catalyst for the development of Irish modernism. This period of Abbey history also includes the saga of Shaw's little-known play O'Flaherty, V.C. (1915). Having been asked in 1915 by the Under-Secretary of Ireland to write a play to help recruit Irish soldiers for the British army, Shaw produced a one-act jeremiad against romantic...","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland ed. by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/vic.2023.a911128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland ed. by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel Susan Harris (bio) Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland, edited by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel; pp. xxvi + 274. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, $119.99, $89.00 ebook. One of the consequences of what Declan Kiberd has famously called the worlding of Irish Studies has been a shift in the field's conception of who the major Irish modernists are. Widening the scope from nationalism to internationalism has created more room in the Irish canon for modern writers whose relationship to the Irish revival and/or Irish nationalism was antagonistic, tangential, or ambivalent. Figures like Oscar Wilde and Samuel Beckett—Irish-born, Irish-educated writers whose careers unfolded outside of Ireland and whose work does not overtly engage Ireland—have moved in from the margins. Somewhat belatedly, George Bernard Shaw is making that journey. In the twenty-first century, Shaw's work is getting renewed critical attention. The past decade has produced new single-author studies like Matthew Yde's Bernard Shaw and Totalitarianism: Longing for Utopia (2013) and Steven Watt's Bernard Shaw's Fiction, Material Psychology, and Affect: Shaw, Freud, Simmel (2018). Shaw has also figured in a number of new investigations of the origins of modern drama in English, including David Kornhaber's The Birth of Theater from the Spirit of Philosophy: Nietzsche and the Modern Drama (2016), Patrick Bixby's Nietzsche and Irish Modernism (2022), and my own Irish Drama and the Other Revolutions: Playwrights, Sexual Politics and the International Left, 1892–1964 (2017). With Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland, Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel seek to establish Shaw as a major Irish modernist. Lamenting that Shaw \\\"remained outside the realms of Irish studies until … 2010\\\" (2), McNamara and Ritschel have assembled a group of essays that seek to \\\"demonstrat[e] how influential a figure he was in the ongoing debate and movement toward Irish independence\\\" and [End Page 342] \\\"highligh[t] the international vision Shaw had for a modernizing Ireland\\\" (5). The collection appears to have been inspired by the International Shaw Society's 2012 meeting in Dublin and includes the address given at that conference by Irish President Michael D. Higgins. The collection is part of Palgrave's series \\\"Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries,\\\" which was launched in 2016 with David Clare's Bernard Shaw's Irish Outlook, and which now boasts over twenty titles. Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland is shaped by a tension between two different impulses legible in its introduction. Connecting Shaw to the Irish revival, on the one hand, is for some of these authors part of a larger attempt to reconceive that revival as international and cosmopolitan rather than nationalist and insular. On the other hand, there also seems to be a concern to insert Shaw into a conception of Irish modernism which is more strictly defined by Irish nationalism and its preoccupations. Collectively, these chapters expand our understanding of Shaw's biographical, historical, and political context in welcome and generative ways. Several chapters zoom in on an important and under-discussed period of Abbey Theater history: the years between the beginning of the Irish revolutionary period (the great Dublin Lockout of 1913) and the emergence of Lennox Robinson as the next long-term Abbey director in the early 1920s. It was during this decade of turbulence—when directors cycled through the Abbey almost on a yearly basis, often departing under a cloud—that Shaw's plays finally took over the Dublin stage, as they had long dominated serious drama in London. Anthony Roche's investigation of this period makes a persuasive case for considering Joseph Augustus Keough's 1916–17 Shavian season at the Abbey an important catalyst for the development of Irish modernism. This period of Abbey history also includes the saga of Shaw's little-known play O'Flaherty, V.C. (1915). Having been asked in 1915 by the Under-Secretary of Ireland to write a play to help recruit Irish soldiers for the British army, Shaw produced a one-act jeremiad against romantic...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书评:《萧伯纳与现代爱尔兰的形成》,奥黛丽·麦克纳马拉和纳尔逊·奥凯拉莱·里切尔主编;第二十六页+ 274页。Cham,瑞士:Palgrave Macmillan出版社,2020,119.99美元,电子书89.00美元。德克兰·基伯德(Declan Kiberd)著名的“爱尔兰研究的世界”的一个后果是,学界对谁是主要爱尔兰现代主义者的概念发生了转变。将范围从民族主义扩大到国际主义,为那些与爱尔兰复兴和/或爱尔兰民族主义的关系是敌对的、疏远的或矛盾的现代作家在爱尔兰经典中创造了更多的空间。奥斯卡·王尔德(Oscar Wilde)和塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel beckett)等在爱尔兰出生、接受爱尔兰教育的作家,他们的职业生涯在爱尔兰之外展开,他们的作品也没有明显地涉及爱尔兰。乔治•伯纳德•肖(George Bernard Shaw)正在踏上这一征程,虽然有些姗姗来迟。在21世纪,萧伯纳的作品重新受到评论界的关注。过去十年出现了新的单作者研究,如马修·伊德的《萧伯纳与极权主义:对乌托邦的渴望》(2013年)和史蒂文·瓦特的《萧伯纳的小说、物质心理学和情感:萧伯纳、弗洛伊德、齐美尔》(2018年)。萧伯纳还参与了一些关于英语现代戏剧起源的新研究,包括大卫·科恩哈伯的《从哲学精神看戏剧的诞生:尼采与现代戏剧》(2016),帕特里克·比克斯比的《尼采与爱尔兰现代主义》(2022),以及我自己的《爱尔兰戏剧与其他革命:剧作家、性政治和国际左派,1892-1964》(2017)。在《萧伯纳与现代爱尔兰的形成》一书中,奥黛丽·麦克纳马拉和纳尔逊·里切尔试图将萧伯纳确立为一位重要的爱尔兰现代主义者。哀叹萧伯纳“直到……2010年才进入爱尔兰研究的领域”,麦克纳马拉和里切尔汇集了一组文章,试图“证明他在正在进行的辩论和爱尔兰独立运动中是一个多么有影响力的人物”,并“突出了肖伯纳对现代化爱尔兰的国际视野”(5)。这本文集的灵感似乎来自2012年在都柏林举行的国际肖伯纳协会会议,其中包括爱尔兰总统迈克尔·d·希金斯在那次会议上的讲话。这本书是帕尔格雷夫“萧伯纳及其同时代人”系列的一部分,该系列于2016年与大卫·克莱尔的《萧伯纳的爱尔兰展望》一起推出,目前已有20多本。《萧伯纳与现代爱尔兰的形成》是由两种不同冲动之间的紧张关系塑造的,在前言中可以清晰地看到。将萧伯纳与爱尔兰复兴联系起来,一方面,对其中一些作者来说,是一种更大的尝试的一部分,他们试图将爱尔兰复兴重新定义为国际和世界主义,而不是民族主义和狭隘主义。另一方面,似乎也有人想把肖插入爱尔兰现代主义的概念中,这个概念更严格地由爱尔兰民族主义及其关注的问题所定义。总的来说,这些章节以欢迎和富有创造性的方式扩展了我们对萧伯纳传记、历史和政治背景的理解。书中有几章聚焦于阿比剧院历史上一个重要但未被充分讨论的时期:从爱尔兰革命时期开始(1913年都柏林大罢工)到20世纪20年代初伦诺克斯·罗宾逊成为下一任长期阿比剧院导演之间的几年。正是在这动荡的十年里——导演们几乎每年都要在修道院轮流演出,常常在阴云笼罩下离开——萧伯纳的戏剧终于登上了都柏林的舞台,就像它们长期主宰伦敦的严肃戏剧一样。安东尼·罗奇(Anthony Roche)对这一时期的调查,令人信服地证明了约瑟夫·奥古斯都·基奥(Joseph Augustus Keough) 1916-17年在修道院的萧伯纳时期,是爱尔兰现代主义发展的重要催化剂。这一时期的修道院历史还包括萧伯纳鲜为人知的戏剧《奥弗莱厄蒂,V.C.》(1915)的传奇故事。1915年,爱尔兰副部长要求萧伯纳写一部戏剧,帮助英国军队招募爱尔兰士兵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland ed. by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel (review)
Reviewed by: Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland ed. by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel Susan Harris (bio) Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland, edited by Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel; pp. xxvi + 274. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, $119.99, $89.00 ebook. One of the consequences of what Declan Kiberd has famously called the worlding of Irish Studies has been a shift in the field's conception of who the major Irish modernists are. Widening the scope from nationalism to internationalism has created more room in the Irish canon for modern writers whose relationship to the Irish revival and/or Irish nationalism was antagonistic, tangential, or ambivalent. Figures like Oscar Wilde and Samuel Beckett—Irish-born, Irish-educated writers whose careers unfolded outside of Ireland and whose work does not overtly engage Ireland—have moved in from the margins. Somewhat belatedly, George Bernard Shaw is making that journey. In the twenty-first century, Shaw's work is getting renewed critical attention. The past decade has produced new single-author studies like Matthew Yde's Bernard Shaw and Totalitarianism: Longing for Utopia (2013) and Steven Watt's Bernard Shaw's Fiction, Material Psychology, and Affect: Shaw, Freud, Simmel (2018). Shaw has also figured in a number of new investigations of the origins of modern drama in English, including David Kornhaber's The Birth of Theater from the Spirit of Philosophy: Nietzsche and the Modern Drama (2016), Patrick Bixby's Nietzsche and Irish Modernism (2022), and my own Irish Drama and the Other Revolutions: Playwrights, Sexual Politics and the International Left, 1892–1964 (2017). With Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland, Audrey McNamara and Nelson O'Ceallaigh Ritschel seek to establish Shaw as a major Irish modernist. Lamenting that Shaw "remained outside the realms of Irish studies until … 2010" (2), McNamara and Ritschel have assembled a group of essays that seek to "demonstrat[e] how influential a figure he was in the ongoing debate and movement toward Irish independence" and [End Page 342] "highligh[t] the international vision Shaw had for a modernizing Ireland" (5). The collection appears to have been inspired by the International Shaw Society's 2012 meeting in Dublin and includes the address given at that conference by Irish President Michael D. Higgins. The collection is part of Palgrave's series "Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries," which was launched in 2016 with David Clare's Bernard Shaw's Irish Outlook, and which now boasts over twenty titles. Bernard Shaw and the Making of Modern Ireland is shaped by a tension between two different impulses legible in its introduction. Connecting Shaw to the Irish revival, on the one hand, is for some of these authors part of a larger attempt to reconceive that revival as international and cosmopolitan rather than nationalist and insular. On the other hand, there also seems to be a concern to insert Shaw into a conception of Irish modernism which is more strictly defined by Irish nationalism and its preoccupations. Collectively, these chapters expand our understanding of Shaw's biographical, historical, and political context in welcome and generative ways. Several chapters zoom in on an important and under-discussed period of Abbey Theater history: the years between the beginning of the Irish revolutionary period (the great Dublin Lockout of 1913) and the emergence of Lennox Robinson as the next long-term Abbey director in the early 1920s. It was during this decade of turbulence—when directors cycled through the Abbey almost on a yearly basis, often departing under a cloud—that Shaw's plays finally took over the Dublin stage, as they had long dominated serious drama in London. Anthony Roche's investigation of this period makes a persuasive case for considering Joseph Augustus Keough's 1916–17 Shavian season at the Abbey an important catalyst for the development of Irish modernism. This period of Abbey history also includes the saga of Shaw's little-known play O'Flaherty, V.C. (1915). Having been asked in 1915 by the Under-Secretary of Ireland to write a play to help recruit Irish soldiers for the British army, Shaw produced a one-act jeremiad against romantic...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VICTORIAN STUDIES
VICTORIAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For more than 50 years, Victorian Studies has been devoted to the study of British culture of the Victorian age. It regularly includes interdisciplinary articles on comparative literature, social and political history, and the histories of education, philosophy, fine arts, economics, law and science, as well as review essays, and an extensive book review section. An annual cumulative and fully searchable bibliography of noteworthy publications that have a bearing on the Victorian period is available electronically and is included in the cost of a subscription. Victorian Studies Online Bibliography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信