不同小波变换检测正常和心律失常心电信号的性能比较

Mu'thiana Gusnam, Hendra Kusuma, Tri Arief Sardjono
{"title":"不同小波变换检测正常和心律失常心电信号的性能比较","authors":"Mu'thiana Gusnam, Hendra Kusuma, Tri Arief Sardjono","doi":"10.12962/jaree.v7i1.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac Activity forms a signal of electrical potential waves in the heart that can be recorded using an Electrocardiogram (ECG). The results of the ECG signal can determine the conditions and abnormalities experienced by the heart, such as arrhythmias. Medical personnel diagnoses normal and arrhythmia heart conditions by looking at R peaks and R-R interval features. Normal conditions have regular R peaks and R-R intervals, whereas arrhythmias are irregular. The challenges in diagnosing ECG signals are that sometimes the signal has some noises that need reducing noise (denoising) are not required in the signal so it can be easier to detect abnormalities. This paper is a brief study of the comparison of the best performance in detecting ECG signals using various wavelet transforms and optimal threshold values based on empirical methods to obtain R peaks and R-R interval features. Wavelet transform describes the signals that can compress the ECG signal and reduce noise without losing important clinical information that can be achieved by medical personnel. The wavelet transform is suitable for approaching data with a discontinuity signal, so the frequency component will increase if noise or anomalies occur in the ECG signal. The various wavelet transforms used Daubechies (db4), Symlets (sym4), Coiflets (coif4), and Biorthogonal (bior3.7) with four types of Detail and Approximate levels; they are Level 1, 2, 3, and 4. The comparison result for the best performance of the various wavelet transforms is using Daubechies wavelet, and biorthogonal wavelet with an accuracy percentage of 100% at level 2 for diagnosing arrhythmia and 93.1% at level 1 for normal diagnosis from 31 data for arrhythmia and 18 for Normal sourced of the MIT-BIH Database. Hence, the total accuracy results obtained from all the data tested is 96.55%.","PeriodicalId":32708,"journal":{"name":"JAREE Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Performance of Various Wavelet Transformation for the Detection of Normal and Arrhythmia ECG Signal\",\"authors\":\"Mu'thiana Gusnam, Hendra Kusuma, Tri Arief Sardjono\",\"doi\":\"10.12962/jaree.v7i1.343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiac Activity forms a signal of electrical potential waves in the heart that can be recorded using an Electrocardiogram (ECG). The results of the ECG signal can determine the conditions and abnormalities experienced by the heart, such as arrhythmias. Medical personnel diagnoses normal and arrhythmia heart conditions by looking at R peaks and R-R interval features. Normal conditions have regular R peaks and R-R intervals, whereas arrhythmias are irregular. The challenges in diagnosing ECG signals are that sometimes the signal has some noises that need reducing noise (denoising) are not required in the signal so it can be easier to detect abnormalities. This paper is a brief study of the comparison of the best performance in detecting ECG signals using various wavelet transforms and optimal threshold values based on empirical methods to obtain R peaks and R-R interval features. Wavelet transform describes the signals that can compress the ECG signal and reduce noise without losing important clinical information that can be achieved by medical personnel. The wavelet transform is suitable for approaching data with a discontinuity signal, so the frequency component will increase if noise or anomalies occur in the ECG signal. The various wavelet transforms used Daubechies (db4), Symlets (sym4), Coiflets (coif4), and Biorthogonal (bior3.7) with four types of Detail and Approximate levels; they are Level 1, 2, 3, and 4. The comparison result for the best performance of the various wavelet transforms is using Daubechies wavelet, and biorthogonal wavelet with an accuracy percentage of 100% at level 2 for diagnosing arrhythmia and 93.1% at level 1 for normal diagnosis from 31 data for arrhythmia and 18 for Normal sourced of the MIT-BIH Database. Hence, the total accuracy results obtained from all the data tested is 96.55%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAREE Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAREE Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12962/jaree.v7i1.343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAREE Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12962/jaree.v7i1.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏活动在心脏中形成一种可以用心电图(ECG)记录的电位波信号。心电图信号的结果可以确定心脏所经历的状况和异常,如心律失常。医务人员通过观察R峰和R-R间隔特征来诊断正常和心律失常的心脏状况。正常情况下有规则的R峰和R-R间隔,而心律失常是不规则的。心电信号诊断的挑战在于,有时信号中含有一些不需要去噪的噪声,因此更容易发现异常。本文简要研究了各种小波变换在心电信号检测中的最佳性能,以及基于经验方法的最优阈值,以获得R峰和R-R区间特征。小波变换所描述的信号既能压缩心电信号,又能在不丢失重要临床信息的前提下降低噪声,从而达到医务人员的目的。小波变换适合于处理具有不连续信号的数据,因此当心电信号中出现噪声或异常时,其频率分量会增大。各种小波变换使用四种类型的细节和近似水平的Daubechies (db4), Symlets (sym4), Coiflets (coif4)和Biorthogonal (bior3.7);分别是1级、2级、3级和4级。各种小波变换的最佳性能比较结果是使用Daubechies小波和双正交小波,在诊断心律失常的2级准确率为100%,正常诊断的1级准确率为93.1%,来自MIT-BIH数据库的31个心律失常数据和18个正常数据。因此,从所有测试数据中获得的总准确率为96.55%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Performance of Various Wavelet Transformation for the Detection of Normal and Arrhythmia ECG Signal
Cardiac Activity forms a signal of electrical potential waves in the heart that can be recorded using an Electrocardiogram (ECG). The results of the ECG signal can determine the conditions and abnormalities experienced by the heart, such as arrhythmias. Medical personnel diagnoses normal and arrhythmia heart conditions by looking at R peaks and R-R interval features. Normal conditions have regular R peaks and R-R intervals, whereas arrhythmias are irregular. The challenges in diagnosing ECG signals are that sometimes the signal has some noises that need reducing noise (denoising) are not required in the signal so it can be easier to detect abnormalities. This paper is a brief study of the comparison of the best performance in detecting ECG signals using various wavelet transforms and optimal threshold values based on empirical methods to obtain R peaks and R-R interval features. Wavelet transform describes the signals that can compress the ECG signal and reduce noise without losing important clinical information that can be achieved by medical personnel. The wavelet transform is suitable for approaching data with a discontinuity signal, so the frequency component will increase if noise or anomalies occur in the ECG signal. The various wavelet transforms used Daubechies (db4), Symlets (sym4), Coiflets (coif4), and Biorthogonal (bior3.7) with four types of Detail and Approximate levels; they are Level 1, 2, 3, and 4. The comparison result for the best performance of the various wavelet transforms is using Daubechies wavelet, and biorthogonal wavelet with an accuracy percentage of 100% at level 2 for diagnosing arrhythmia and 93.1% at level 1 for normal diagnosis from 31 data for arrhythmia and 18 for Normal sourced of the MIT-BIH Database. Hence, the total accuracy results obtained from all the data tested is 96.55%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信