预测甲状腺异常特殊疾病症状的确定性因子值及其置信水平:一个回归模型分析

Rosyid Ridlo Al-Hakim, Yanuar Zulardiansyah Arief, Agung Pangestu, Hexa Apriliana Hidayah, Aditia Putra Hamid, Aviasenna Andriand, Nur Fauzi Soelaiman, Machnun Arif, Mahmmoud Hussein Abdel Alrahman
{"title":"预测甲状腺异常特殊疾病症状的确定性因子值及其置信水平:一个回归模型分析","authors":"Rosyid Ridlo Al-Hakim, Yanuar Zulardiansyah Arief, Agung Pangestu, Hexa Apriliana Hidayah, Aditia Putra Hamid, Aviasenna Andriand, Nur Fauzi Soelaiman, Machnun Arif, Mahmmoud Hussein Abdel Alrahman","doi":"10.32520/stmsi.v12i2.2542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional expert system (TES) in the medical field commonly uses a certainty factor (CF) rule-based algorithm that can be calculated several symptoms to determine the inference solutions. The main issue for this TES included a prediction for some particular disease likelihood in the cases of new patients. CF is calculated based on symptoms related to clinical signs in patients’ diagnoses. For some reason, this TES probably won’t predict uncertain things, such as particular disease likelihood of some diseases. So, supervised learning, such as linear regression, can solve this problem. We tried to analyse the existing TES for thyroid disorders due to modelling the regression equation to predict the thyroid abnormality particular disease likelihood, based on the symptoms’ CF value and its confidence level. We used multiple linear regression (MLR) and multiple polynomial regression (MPR) to analyse the best regression model to solve the problem. The results show that the MPR model indicates the best regression model for predicting particular disease likelihood of thyroid abnormality, supported by R-squared 94.7%, R-squared adjusted 94.4%, F-value 265.925, and p-value < 0.05, which are higher than MLR model. Our study proposed a foundation for expert system development by focusing more on machine learning expert system (MLES) analysis approaches than TES.","PeriodicalId":32357,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sistem Informasi","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predict the thyroid abnormality particular disease likelihood of the symptoms’ certainty factor value and its confidence level: A regression model analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rosyid Ridlo Al-Hakim, Yanuar Zulardiansyah Arief, Agung Pangestu, Hexa Apriliana Hidayah, Aditia Putra Hamid, Aviasenna Andriand, Nur Fauzi Soelaiman, Machnun Arif, Mahmmoud Hussein Abdel Alrahman\",\"doi\":\"10.32520/stmsi.v12i2.2542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional expert system (TES) in the medical field commonly uses a certainty factor (CF) rule-based algorithm that can be calculated several symptoms to determine the inference solutions. The main issue for this TES included a prediction for some particular disease likelihood in the cases of new patients. CF is calculated based on symptoms related to clinical signs in patients’ diagnoses. For some reason, this TES probably won’t predict uncertain things, such as particular disease likelihood of some diseases. So, supervised learning, such as linear regression, can solve this problem. We tried to analyse the existing TES for thyroid disorders due to modelling the regression equation to predict the thyroid abnormality particular disease likelihood, based on the symptoms’ CF value and its confidence level. We used multiple linear regression (MLR) and multiple polynomial regression (MPR) to analyse the best regression model to solve the problem. The results show that the MPR model indicates the best regression model for predicting particular disease likelihood of thyroid abnormality, supported by R-squared 94.7%, R-squared adjusted 94.4%, F-value 265.925, and p-value < 0.05, which are higher than MLR model. Our study proposed a foundation for expert system development by focusing more on machine learning expert system (MLES) analysis approaches than TES.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sistem Informasi\",\"volume\":\"294 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sistem Informasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v12i2.2542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sistem Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v12i2.2542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学领域传统的专家系统(TES)通常使用基于确定性因子(CF)规则的算法,该算法可以计算几种症状来确定推理解。该TES的主要问题包括对新患者病例中某些特定疾病可能性的预测。CF是根据患者诊断中与临床体征相关的症状来计算的。由于某些原因,这种TES可能无法预测不确定的事情,例如某些疾病的特定疾病可能性。因此,监督学习,比如线性回归,可以解决这个问题。我们试图对现有的甲状腺疾病TES进行分析,因为我们建立了回归方程,根据症状的CF值及其置信水平来预测甲状腺异常特定疾病的可能性。我们使用多元线性回归(MLR)和多元多项式回归(MPR)来分析解决问题的最佳回归模型。结果表明,MPR模型是预测甲状腺异常特定疾病可能性的最佳回归模型,r平方支持度为94.7%,r平方调整后支持度为94.4%,f值为265.925,p值为<0.05,高于MLR模型。我们的研究通过更多地关注机器学习专家系统(MLES)分析方法而不是TES,为专家系统的开发奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predict the thyroid abnormality particular disease likelihood of the symptoms’ certainty factor value and its confidence level: A regression model analysis
The traditional expert system (TES) in the medical field commonly uses a certainty factor (CF) rule-based algorithm that can be calculated several symptoms to determine the inference solutions. The main issue for this TES included a prediction for some particular disease likelihood in the cases of new patients. CF is calculated based on symptoms related to clinical signs in patients’ diagnoses. For some reason, this TES probably won’t predict uncertain things, such as particular disease likelihood of some diseases. So, supervised learning, such as linear regression, can solve this problem. We tried to analyse the existing TES for thyroid disorders due to modelling the regression equation to predict the thyroid abnormality particular disease likelihood, based on the symptoms’ CF value and its confidence level. We used multiple linear regression (MLR) and multiple polynomial regression (MPR) to analyse the best regression model to solve the problem. The results show that the MPR model indicates the best regression model for predicting particular disease likelihood of thyroid abnormality, supported by R-squared 94.7%, R-squared adjusted 94.4%, F-value 265.925, and p-value < 0.05, which are higher than MLR model. Our study proposed a foundation for expert system development by focusing more on machine learning expert system (MLES) analysis approaches than TES.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信