Muhammad Javed, Tehreem Zahid, Nasr-us-Salam Ghulam Akbar, Palwasha Alavi, Ammar Khalid Choudry, Maliha Aziz
{"title":"COVID-19患者心肌损伤的危险因素和模式:一项单中心队列研究","authors":"Muhammad Javed, Tehreem Zahid, Nasr-us-Salam Ghulam Akbar, Palwasha Alavi, Ammar Khalid Choudry, Maliha Aziz","doi":"10.33590/emjcardiol/10300480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The primary objective was to compare the risk factors and trends of patients with COVID-19 with and without biochemical evidence of myocardial injury. Secondary objectives were the duration of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit, mode of resuscitation, and use of supplemental O2. Design, and place and duration of study: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Shifa International Hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan. The study was conducted from May 2021–May 2022. Methodology: 113 patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and troponin-I investigation were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: with and without myocardial injury on admission. Demographics, symptoms, diagnostics, vitals, comorbidities, and outcomes were noted. The χ2 exact test for categorical variables and independent t-test for continuous variables were used. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics®, version 26.0 (IBM®, Armonk, New York, USA), with 0.05 as a level of significance. Results: Out of 113 patients, 47 patients (42%) had no myocardial injury on admission. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Patients with myocardial injury were older, male, and unvaccinated against COVID-19 (p<0.01). No vital signs or presenting symptoms were statistically significant for myocardial injury. A comorbidity of hypertension on admission was suggestive of myocardial damage. Patients with myocardial injury had a higher risk of requiring resuscitation by cardiopulmonary resuscitation or pharmacologic means. Conclusion: Patients with myocardial injury did not have any impact on the composite of secondary outcomes, such as the duration of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit, and use of supplemental O2.","PeriodicalId":90162,"journal":{"name":"European medical Journal. Urology","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors and Patterns of Myocardial Injury in Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Centre Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Javed, Tehreem Zahid, Nasr-us-Salam Ghulam Akbar, Palwasha Alavi, Ammar Khalid Choudry, Maliha Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.33590/emjcardiol/10300480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The primary objective was to compare the risk factors and trends of patients with COVID-19 with and without biochemical evidence of myocardial injury. Secondary objectives were the duration of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit, mode of resuscitation, and use of supplemental O2. Design, and place and duration of study: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Shifa International Hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan. The study was conducted from May 2021–May 2022. Methodology: 113 patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and troponin-I investigation were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: with and without myocardial injury on admission. Demographics, symptoms, diagnostics, vitals, comorbidities, and outcomes were noted. The χ2 exact test for categorical variables and independent t-test for continuous variables were used. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics®, version 26.0 (IBM®, Armonk, New York, USA), with 0.05 as a level of significance. Results: Out of 113 patients, 47 patients (42%) had no myocardial injury on admission. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Patients with myocardial injury were older, male, and unvaccinated against COVID-19 (p<0.01). No vital signs or presenting symptoms were statistically significant for myocardial injury. A comorbidity of hypertension on admission was suggestive of myocardial damage. Patients with myocardial injury had a higher risk of requiring resuscitation by cardiopulmonary resuscitation or pharmacologic means. Conclusion: Patients with myocardial injury did not have any impact on the composite of secondary outcomes, such as the duration of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit, and use of supplemental O2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European medical Journal. Urology\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European medical Journal. Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjcardiol/10300480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European medical Journal. Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjcardiol/10300480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较有无心肌损伤生化证据的COVID-19患者的危险因素及趋势。次要目标是住院时间、入住重症监护病房、复苏模式和补充氧气的使用。设计、地点和研究时间:这项回顾性队列研究在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡的Shifa国际医院进行。该研究于2021年5月至2022年5月进行。方法:纳入113例确诊为COVID-19并进行肌钙蛋白-1检测的住院患者。患者入院时分为心肌损伤组和无心肌损伤组。记录了人口统计学、症状、诊断、生命体征、合并症和结果。分类变量采用χ2精确检验,连续变量采用独立t检验。所有统计分析均使用SPSS Statistics®,version 26.0 (IBM®,Armonk, New York, USA)进行,显著性水平为0.05。结果:113例患者入院时无心肌损伤47例(42%)。患者平均年龄63岁。心肌损伤患者年龄较大,男性,未接种COVID-19疫苗(p<0.01)。心肌损伤无生命体征或表现症状,差异有统计学意义。入院时高血压的合并症提示心肌损害。心肌损伤患者需要心肺复苏或药物手段复苏的风险较高。结论:心肌损伤患者对住院时间、入住重症监护病房和补充氧气使用等次要综合结局没有任何影响。
Risk Factors and Patterns of Myocardial Injury in Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Centre Cohort Study
Objective: The primary objective was to compare the risk factors and trends of patients with COVID-19 with and without biochemical evidence of myocardial injury. Secondary objectives were the duration of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit, mode of resuscitation, and use of supplemental O2. Design, and place and duration of study: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Shifa International Hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan. The study was conducted from May 2021–May 2022. Methodology: 113 patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and troponin-I investigation were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: with and without myocardial injury on admission. Demographics, symptoms, diagnostics, vitals, comorbidities, and outcomes were noted. The χ2 exact test for categorical variables and independent t-test for continuous variables were used. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics®, version 26.0 (IBM®, Armonk, New York, USA), with 0.05 as a level of significance. Results: Out of 113 patients, 47 patients (42%) had no myocardial injury on admission. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Patients with myocardial injury were older, male, and unvaccinated against COVID-19 (p<0.01). No vital signs or presenting symptoms were statistically significant for myocardial injury. A comorbidity of hypertension on admission was suggestive of myocardial damage. Patients with myocardial injury had a higher risk of requiring resuscitation by cardiopulmonary resuscitation or pharmacologic means. Conclusion: Patients with myocardial injury did not have any impact on the composite of secondary outcomes, such as the duration of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit, and use of supplemental O2.