PO08

Jill Bennett, Cédric Bélanger, Philippe Chatigny, Luc Beaulieu, Alexandra Rink
{"title":"PO08","authors":"Jill Bennett, Cédric Bélanger, Philippe Chatigny, Luc Beaulieu, Alexandra Rink","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Materials and Methods Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. Results The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% with CVT catheters. Conclusions This retrospective work supports the hypothesis that CVT with post-TAPP imaging can achieve clinically acceptable dosimetry while limiting insertion of extraneous catheters for cervix cases using the IU and Syed Neblett template. Future work will increase the cohort size and further quantify the effect of lowering the number of CVT catheters. Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% with CVT catheters. This retrospective work supports the hypothesis that CVT with post-TAPP imaging can achieve clinically acceptable dosimetry while limiting insertion of extraneous catheters for cervix cases using the IU and Syed Neblett template. Future work will increase the cohort size and further quantify the effect of lowering the number of CVT catheters.","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PO08\",\"authors\":\"Jill Bennett, Cédric Bélanger, Philippe Chatigny, Luc Beaulieu, Alexandra Rink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Materials and Methods Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. Results The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% with CVT catheters. Conclusions This retrospective work supports the hypothesis that CVT with post-TAPP imaging can achieve clinically acceptable dosimetry while limiting insertion of extraneous catheters for cervix cases using the IU and Syed Neblett template. Future work will increase the cohort size and further quantify the effect of lowering the number of CVT catheters. Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% with CVT catheters. This retrospective work supports the hypothesis that CVT with post-TAPP imaging can achieve clinically acceptable dosimetry while limiting insertion of extraneous catheters for cervix cases using the IU and Syed Neblett template. Future work will increase the cohort size and further quantify the effect of lowering the number of CVT catheters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。材料与方法选择2016 - 2020年采用IS BT联合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。CVT布置中的导管数量等于临床植入物中的导管数量,或CVT规划区域(定义为高风险临床靶体积[HR-CTV]减去模板平面上投影的桨)中可用模板位置的数量,以较低者为准。然后由一名专家手动生成CVT和临床导管布置的治疗计划。计划的可接受性通过遵守恩拜拉- ii剂量-体积直方图限制(每组分2 Gy的等有效剂量)来评估。剂量不均匀性测量(%V150HR-CTV和%V200HR-CTV)也被记录。结果CVT优化导管的平均时间为11.49 s。除1例外,所有病例均采用CVT安排,与临床病例相比,CVT组的平均D90HR-CTV、D98HR-CTV和D98IR-CTV均增加,与临床组相比,平均D98GTVres增加2.2 Gy,具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CVT组平均%V150HR-CTV升高2.2% (p < 0.05)。平均未使用导管数由临床方案的4个减少到CVT方案的0个(p < 0.001),导管的接受率由临床方案的50%提高到CVT方案的66.67%。结论本回顾性研究支持以下假设:在使用IU和Syed Neblett模板限制宫颈病例外置导管插入的同时,tapp后成像CVT可以达到临床可接受的剂量测定。未来的工作将增加队列规模,并进一步量化降低CVT导管数量的效果。近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。本研究选取2016 - 2020年使用IS BT结合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。 目的近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。材料与方法选择2016 - 2020年采用IS BT联合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。CVT布置中的导管数量等于临床植入物中的导管数量,或CVT规划区域(定义为高风险临床靶体积[HR-CTV]减去模板平面上投影的桨)中可用模板位置的数量,以较低者为准。然后由一名专家手动生成CVT和临床导管布置的治疗计划。计划的可接受性通过遵守恩拜拉- ii剂量-体积直方图限制(每组分2 Gy的等有效剂量)来评估。剂量不均匀性测量(%V150HR-CTV和%V200HR-CTV)也被记录。结果CVT优化导管的平均时间为11.49 s。除1例外,所有病例均采用CVT安排,与临床病例相比,CVT组的平均D90HR-CTV、D98HR-CTV和D98IR-CTV均增加,与临床组相比,平均D98GTVres增加2.2 Gy,具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CVT组平均%V150HR-CTV升高2.2% (p < 0.05)。平均未使用导管数由临床方案的4个减少到CVT方案的0个(p < 0.001),导管的接受率由临床方案的50%提高到CVT方案的66.67%。结论本回顾性研究支持以下假设:在使用IU和Syed Neblett模板限制宫颈病例外置导管插入的同时,tapp后成像CVT可以达到临床可接受的剂量测定。未来的工作将增加队列规模,并进一步量化降低CVT导管数量的效果。近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。本研究选取2016 - 2020年使用IS BT结合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。 CVT布置中的导管数量等于临床植入物中的导管数量,或CVT规划区域(定义为高风险临床靶体积[HR-CTV]减去模板平面上投影的桨)中可用模板位置的数量,以较低者为准。然后由一名专家手动生成CVT和临床导管布置的治疗计划。计划的可接受性通过遵守恩拜拉- ii剂量-体积直方图限制(每组分2 Gy的等有效剂量)来评估。剂量不均匀性测量(%V150HR-CTV和%V200HR-CTV)也被记录。CVT优化导管的平均时间为11.49 s。除1例外,所有病例均采用CVT安排,与临床病例相比,CVT组的平均D90HR-CTV、D98HR-CTV和D98IR-CTV均增加,与临床组相比,平均D98GTVres增加2.2 Gy,具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CVT组平均%V150HR-CTV升高2.2% (p < 0.05)。平均未使用导管数由临床方案的4个减少到CVT方案的0个(p < 0.001),导管的接受率由临床方案的50%提高到CVT方案的66.67%。这项回顾性研究支持了这样的假设,即在使用IU和Syed Neblett模板的宫颈病例中,CVT与tapp后成像可以达到临床可接受的剂量测定,同时限制了外置导管的插入。未来的工作将增加队列规模,并进一步量化降低CVT导管数量的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PO08
Purpose Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Materials and Methods Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. Results The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% with CVT catheters. Conclusions This retrospective work supports the hypothesis that CVT with post-TAPP imaging can achieve clinically acceptable dosimetry while limiting insertion of extraneous catheters for cervix cases using the IU and Syed Neblett template. Future work will increase the cohort size and further quantify the effect of lowering the number of CVT catheters. Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% with CVT catheters. This retrospective work supports the hypothesis that CVT with post-TAPP imaging can achieve clinically acceptable dosimetry while limiting insertion of extraneous catheters for cervix cases using the IU and Syed Neblett template. Future work will increase the cohort size and further quantify the effect of lowering the number of CVT catheters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信