PO83

Christopher Jason Tien, Emily Draeger, Fada Guan, David J. Carlson, Zhe Jay Chen
{"title":"PO83","authors":"Christopher Jason Tien, Emily Draeger, Fada Guan, David J. Carlson, Zhe Jay Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Materials and Methods Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. Results A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. Conclusions By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able to extract a population-averaged fractional TCP. This framework can be used to test the sensitivity of the TCP model by systematically varying the input model parameters. This methodology is especially promising because it can simultaneously handle many more radiobiological parameters so long as the patient cohort size is increased enough to satisfy statistical requirements. In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able to extract a population-averaged fractional TCP. This framework can be used to test the sensitivity of the TCP model by systematically varying the input model parameters. This methodology is especially promising because it can simultaneously handle many more radiobiological parameters so long as the patient cohort size is increased enough to satisfy statistical requirements.","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PO83\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Jason Tien, Emily Draeger, Fada Guan, David J. Carlson, Zhe Jay Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Materials and Methods Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. Results A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. Conclusions By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able to extract a population-averaged fractional TCP. This framework can be used to test the sensitivity of the TCP model by systematically varying the input model parameters. This methodology is especially promising because it can simultaneously handle many more radiobiological parameters so long as the patient cohort size is increased enough to satisfy statistical requirements. In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able to extract a population-averaged fractional TCP. This framework can be used to test the sensitivity of the TCP model by systematically varying the input model parameters. This methodology is especially promising because it can simultaneously handle many more radiobiological parameters so long as the patient cohort size is increased enough to satisfy statistical requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为了建立一种能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,有必要首先探讨该模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。材料与方法根据Wang等人的前期研究,并经AAPM TG137和TG265认可,随机分配每个虚拟患者的α和α/β值:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在α值从0.7 Gy-1到0.23 Gy-1和α/β值从1.5 Gy- 5.0 Gy-1之间有意改变α或α/β值的情况下,对100万名患者进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性。结果共生成了11条TCP曲线。对于每条曲线,创建100万例患者,并分配α, α/β值。对于使用高斯和对数正态函数的参考队列,TCP90%和TCP50%分别为89.4和68.9 Gy。当α/β=1.5、2.6、3.1、3.6、5 Gy时,TCP90%分别为70.3、84.3、89.4、93.1、101 Gy, TCP50%分别为56.4、65.9、69.6、71.8、77.7 Gy。当α=0.07、0.11、0.15、0.19、0.23 Gy-1时,TCP90%分别为126.1、92.3、74.0、62.3、53.5,TCP50%分别为114.3、89.8、67.4、56.4、48.3 Gy。如图所示,较大的α值或较小的α/β比值使TCP曲线向较低的TCP90%和TCP50%移动。此外,选择以0.15 Gy-1为中心的α值分布,而不是固定的α=0.15 Gy-1,可以使TCP曲线的斜率显著变平,而使用α/β值分布会产生难以区分的TCP曲线。利用大数定律和原始计算能力,我们能够创建多个异构队列,每个队列包含100万虚拟患者,并基于先前发表的可信α和α/β值分布生成真实的TCP曲线,例如AAPM TG137和TG265认可的分布。该虚拟临床试验能够提取出总体平均分数TCP。该框架可以通过系统地改变输入模型参数来测试TCP模型的灵敏度。这种方法特别有前途,因为只要患者队列的规模增加到足以满足统计要求,它就可以同时处理更多的放射生物学参数。为了建立能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,首先需要探索模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。每个虚拟患者随机分配α和α/β值,其随机分布基于Wang等人的前期研究,并得到AAPM TG137和TG265的认可:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在100万名患者中进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性,并在α值从0.7到0之间有意改变α或α/β值。 目的为了建立一种能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,有必要首先探讨该模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。材料与方法根据Wang等人的前期研究,并经AAPM TG137和TG265认可,随机分配每个虚拟患者的α和α/β值:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在α值从0.7 Gy-1到0.23 Gy-1和α/β值从1.5 Gy- 5.0 Gy-1之间有意改变α或α/β值的情况下,对100万名患者进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性。结果共生成了11条TCP曲线。对于每条曲线,创建100万例患者,并分配α, α/β值。对于使用高斯和对数正态函数的参考队列,TCP90%和TCP50%分别为89.4和68.9 Gy。当α/β=1.5、2.6、3.1、3.6、5 Gy时,TCP90%分别为70.3、84.3、89.4、93.1、101 Gy, TCP50%分别为56.4、65.9、69.6、71.8、77.7 Gy。当α=0.07、0.11、0.15、0.19、0.23 Gy-1时,TCP90%分别为126.1、92.3、74.0、62.3、53.5,TCP50%分别为114.3、89.8、67.4、56.4、48.3 Gy。如图所示,较大的α值或较小的α/β比值使TCP曲线向较低的TCP90%和TCP50%移动。此外,选择以0.15 Gy-1为中心的α值分布,而不是固定的α=0.15 Gy-1,可以使TCP曲线的斜率显著变平,而使用α/β值分布会产生难以区分的TCP曲线。利用大数定律和原始计算能力,我们能够创建多个异构队列,每个队列包含100万虚拟患者,并基于先前发表的可信α和α/β值分布生成真实的TCP曲线,例如AAPM TG137和TG265认可的分布。该虚拟临床试验能够提取出总体平均分数TCP。该框架可以通过系统地改变输入模型参数来测试TCP模型的灵敏度。这种方法特别有前途,因为只要患者队列的规模增加到足以满足统计要求,它就可以同时处理更多的放射生物学参数。为了建立能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,首先需要探索模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。每个虚拟患者随机分配α和α/β值,其随机分布基于Wang等人的前期研究,并得到AAPM TG137和TG265的认可:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在100万名患者中进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性,并在α值从0.7到0之间有意改变α或α/β值。 23 Gy-1和α/β值为1.5 ~ 5.0 Gy。生成一系列11条TCP曲线。对于每条曲线,创建100万例患者,并分配α, α/β值。对于使用高斯和对数正态函数的参考队列,TCP90%和TCP50%分别为89.4和68.9 Gy。当α/β=1.5、2.6、3.1、3.6、5 Gy时,TCP90%分别为70.3、84.3、89.4、93.1、101 Gy, TCP50%分别为56.4、65.9、69.6、71.8、77.7 Gy。当α=0.07、0.11、0.15、0.19、0.23 Gy-1时,TCP90%分别为126.1、92.3、74.0、62.3、53.5,TCP50%分别为114.3、89.8、67.4、56.4、48.3 Gy。如图所示,较大的α值或较小的α/β比值使TCP曲线向较低的TCP90%和TCP50%移动。此外,选择以0.15 Gy-1为中心的α值分布,而不是固定的α=0.15 Gy-1,可以使TCP曲线的斜率显著变平,而使用α/β值分布会产生难以区分的TCP曲线。通过利用大数定律和原始计算能力,我们能够创建多个异构队列,每个队列包含100万虚拟患者,并基于先前发表的可信α和α/β值分布生成真实的TCP曲线,例如AAPM TG137和TG265认可的分布。该虚拟临床试验能够提取出总体平均分数TCP。该框架可以通过系统地改变输入模型参数来测试TCP模型的灵敏度。这种方法特别有前途,因为只要患者队列的规模增加到足以满足统计要求,它就可以同时处理更多的放射生物学参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PO83
Purpose In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Materials and Methods Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. Results A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. Conclusions By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able to extract a population-averaged fractional TCP. This framework can be used to test the sensitivity of the TCP model by systematically varying the input model parameters. This methodology is especially promising because it can simultaneously handle many more radiobiological parameters so long as the patient cohort size is increased enough to satisfy statistical requirements. In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able to extract a population-averaged fractional TCP. This framework can be used to test the sensitivity of the TCP model by systematically varying the input model parameters. This methodology is especially promising because it can simultaneously handle many more radiobiological parameters so long as the patient cohort size is increased enough to satisfy statistical requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信